ANGELFIRE1 10 #1 Posted November 6, 2017 Here is a good one, surprised no one has commented on it already. Around £10million of the Queen's private money has been invested in overseas accounts in the Cayman Islands and Bermuda Seems like our super rich monarch is a little naughty, or maybe not. Her "advisers" have come to the fore, stating her maj has nothing to do with these kinds of "investments" they are handled by a third party, apparently. Must be nice to be able to allow someone access to your brass and make "investments" you know nothing about costing £10 million. Still her personal wealth is only around £450 millions, god knows how she manages with such a pitiful amount. Increased revenues from the Crown Estate, which owns properties and land across Britain, will see Her Majesty’s sovereign grant rise by eight per cent from £76million in 2017-18 to £82.2million the year after. Meanwhile the surfs have to use food banks to survive. It does make you think, don't you think. Angel1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
geared 303 #2 Posted November 6, 2017 Must be nice to be able to allow someone access to your brass and make "investments" you know nothing about costing £10 million. Thats very common really. Even Joe Bloggs can have a small investment fund managed by a broker, they won't know what is being done with the money they'll just get a yearly statement showing how it's performing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jeffrey Shaw 90 #3 Posted November 6, 2017 Here is a good one, surprised no one has commented on it already. Around £10million of the Queen's private money has been invested in overseas accounts in the Cayman Islands and Bermuda Seems like our super rich monarch is a little naughty, or maybe not. Her "advisers" have come to the fore, stating her maj has nothing to do with these kinds of "investments" they are handled by a third party, apparently. Must be nice to be able to allow someone access to your brass and make "investments" you know nothing about costing £10 million. Still her personal wealth is only around £450 millions, god knows how she manages with such a pitiful amount. Increased revenues from the Crown Estate, which owns properties and land across Britain, will see Her Majesty’s sovereign grant rise by eight per cent from £76million in 2017-18 to £82.2million the year after. All wrong, of course. HM The Queen has no 'private money' of the kind that you naiively describe. She is the Tenant for Life of the Duchy of Lancaster. Trusts are held by trustees, not beneficiaries (whose entitlement is limited to income during lifetime only). It's the trustees who have management powers. To understand better how trusts are constituted, start with https://www.gov.uk/trusts-taxes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
sgtkate 10 #4 Posted November 6, 2017 Thats very common really. Even Joe Bloggs can have a small investment fund managed by a broker, they won't know what is being done with the money they'll just get a yearly statement showing how it's performing. Yep absolutely. If you buy into a unit trust or a fund then you don't define or often even know where your money is invested. Some do have options to control industries or countries if you have ethics you want maintained but in general the managers just put it wherever they think they will get the best returns. Very unlikely the Queen would have had any direct knowledge of where that money was invested, but it does indeed ask questions around how impossible it seems to be to stop these schemes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest makapaka #5 Posted November 6, 2017 All wrong, of course. HM The Queen has no 'private money' of the kind that you naiively describe. She is the Tenant for Life of the Duchy of Lancaster. Trusts are held by trustees, not beneficiaries (whose entitlement is limited to income during lifetime only). It's the trustees who have management powers. To understand better how trusts are constituted, start with https://www.gov.uk/trusts-taxes I think the wider point that she lives a life of absolute luxury with possessions on her dining table worth enough to rehouse a homeless person is where the OP is coming from. Not the intricacies off trustee tax law. Unless your suggesting that the Queen is short of cash somehow? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
El Cid 214 #6 Posted November 6, 2017 Seems like our super rich monarch is a little naughty, or maybe not. The Queen cannot avoid paying tax, as she has no legal duty top pay tax, so how has she been 'naughty'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mossdog 10 #7 Posted November 6, 2017 The Queen is only one of millions who live a luxury lifestyle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Waldo 96 #8 Posted November 6, 2017 How did the so-called 'royalty' come by their wealth, power and influence, in the first place? Did they just find it under a rock? Won the pools? Or was it more violence, murdering and thievery through the ages? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Penistone999 10 #9 Posted November 6, 2017 No one named in there papers have done anything wrong, broken no laws , done nothing illegal. Why should anyone pay more tax than they have to ? Tax avoidance is perfectly legal . I dont blame any of them for using legal loopholes to avoid tax Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hobinfoot 25 #10 Posted November 6, 2017 I think most people if they were fortunate to have this sort of wealth would try and reduce their tax bill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ANGELFIRE1 10 #11 Posted November 6, 2017 All wrong, of course. HM The Queen has no 'private money' of the kind that you naiively describe. She is the Tenant for Life of the Duchy of Lancaster. Trusts are held by trustees, not beneficiaries (whose entitlement is limited to income during lifetime only). It's the trustees who have management powers. To understand better how trusts are constituted, start with https://www.gov.uk/trusts-taxes Here you are, unless this is lies, cannot see FORBES lying, can you. Queen Elizabeth II’s net worth. The Queen’s personal fortune remains unknown, but in 2016 Forbes estimated that her private wealth came to £415million ($530million). This estimate includes her private real estate portfolio including Sandringham House, Balmoral Castle, real estate in London and agricultural land across the country. Angel1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ECCOnoob 1,020 #12 Posted November 6, 2017 (edited) Here is a good one, surprised no one has commented on it already. Around £10million of the Queen's private money has been invested in overseas accounts in the Cayman Islands and Bermuda Seems like our super rich monarch is a little naughty, or maybe not. Her "advisers" have come to the fore, stating her maj has nothing to do with these kinds of "investments" they are handled by a third party, apparently. Must be nice to be able to allow someone access to your brass and make "investments" you know nothing about costing £10 million. Still her personal wealth is only around £450 millions, god knows how she manages with such a pitiful amount. Increased revenues from the Crown Estate, which owns properties and land across Britain, will see Her Majesty’s sovereign grant rise by eight per cent from £76million in 2017-18 to £82.2million the year after. Meanwhile the surfs have to use food banks to survive. It does make you think, don't you think. Angel1. Trouble for what exactly? Nothing illegal last time I checked. In fact, I bet if any of us could be bothered to take the time to check each and every single investment, batched fund or stock we have in our own pensions, we would find links to such schemes and companies. All blown out of proportion with these so called "investigative journalists" giving each other glad hands over disclosure of information which is quite frankly nobody's business. Notwithstanding that Lizzie's apportionment in such LEGAL schemes is minimal anyway, certain newspapers have even gone so far as to "shame" her for investing in perfectly accepted and operating british companies such as Bright House , just because SOME people have questioned their corporate morals. God sake. Talk about overreaction. Its about time they stop chasing the easy headlines and expose the REAL corruption and illegal activity in the world. Edited November 6, 2017 by ECCOnoob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...