Anna B Â Â 1,409 #1 Posted August 26, 2017 (edited) Leading QC, Michael Mansfield, has called for a fresh investigation into the death of Princess Diana. He insists her death in a car crash 20 years ago was 'no accident.' Â Highly respected, Mr Mansfield, represented Mohammed Al Fayed at the original inquest, which was not a trial, and had to abide by certain inquest rules which prevented full disclosures. Â He was particularly critical of the police's failure to fully investigate the letter which Diana gave to her lawyers predicting her death in a car crash. He airs his suspicions on a programme on TLC tonight. Â Having read the entire verbatim transcripts of the inquest at the time (which was 10 years after her death for some reason,) I was struck by the difference in what was actually said, and the way it was spun in the mainstream media to mean something entirely different. It was that that made me suspicious in the first place. I think there are still questions to be answered. Edited August 26, 2017 by Anna B Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad   3,963 #2 Posted August 26, 2017 Michael Mansfield , lawyer to the rich and famous calls for fresh investigation . Wonder if he can see the ££££ signs ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
andyofborg   11 #3 Posted August 26, 2017 i think we really should let her rest in peace Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #4 Posted August 26, 2017 i think we really should let her rest in peace  What an absurd thing to say; she's utterly unaware of any of it. She's dead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
JNewton69   10 #5 Posted August 26, 2017 (edited) Michael Mansfield , lawyer to the rich and famous calls for fresh investigation . Wonder if he can see the ££££ signs ?  Didn't he stick up for the Guilford four and the Birmingham six? He also defended the Orgreave miners, Mansfield isn't a lackey for the rich and famous. Edited August 26, 2017 by JNewton69 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hauxwell   243 #6 Posted August 26, 2017 Let her rest in peace. The only people I believe who are responsible for her death were the ones who chased the car that night. The same people I suspect who were taking photos of her when she was dying in the back of the car. It's going to be one of those stories in years to come were some will say she was murdered and others, like me believe, it was a tragic accident. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest makapaka   #7 Posted August 26, 2017 Leading QC, Michael Mansfield, has called for a fresh investigation into the death of Princess Diana. He insists her death in a car crash 20 years ago was 'no accident.' Highly respected, Mr Mansfield, represented Mohammed Al Fayed at the original inquest, which was not a trial, and had to abide by certain inquest rules which prevented full disclosures.  He was particularly critical of the police's failure to fully investigate the letter which Diana gave to her lawyers predicting her death in a car crash. He airs his suspicions on a programme on TLC tonight.  Having read the entire verbatim transcripts of the inquest at the time (which was 10 years after her death for some reason,) I was struck by the difference in what was actually said, and the way it was spun in the mainstream media to mean something entirely different. It was that that made me suspicious in the first place. I think there are still questions to be answered.  There aren't - she just died in a car crash.  The media did a sterling job in convincing the country we'd lost a saint when in prior years she wasn't particularly popular - they got to sell papers etc on the back of it and in the mail and express (predominantly) they still do.  They continue to stir it now but it should just be left alone as above posts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad   3,963 #8 Posted August 26, 2017 Didn't he stick up for the Guilford four and the Birmingham six? He also defended the Orgreave miners, Mansfield isn't a lackey for the rich and famous.  All for free? hes only interested in high profile cases Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
JNewton69   10 #9 Posted August 26, 2017 All for free? hes only interested in high profile cases  So he's not interested in defending the rich and famous then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad   3,963 #10 Posted August 26, 2017 So he's not interested in defending the rich and famous then?  ???the rich and famous are high profile Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
JNewton69   10 #11 Posted August 26, 2017 ???the rich and famous are high profile  Birmingham six and the Guilford four? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad   3,963 #12 Posted August 26, 2017 Birmingham six and the Guilford four?  rich ,high profile . famous ,high profile . Birmingham 6 , high profile . Guilford 4 , high profile. Orgreave miners , high profile . Joe Bloggs , no chance . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...