phil752 Â Â 10 #1 Posted October 10, 2018 Should people be named, with out being charged for any offense, trial by mob media. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ProperBrew   10 #2 Posted October 10, 2018 No.  /thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ANGELFIRE1 Â Â 10 #3 Posted October 10, 2018 No. Â Angel1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
petemcewan   27 #4 Posted October 10, 2018 No they should not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat   10 #5 Posted October 10, 2018 Yes.  Sounds like a great idea! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
woodview   10 #6 Posted October 10, 2018 No. Definitely not. The lurid allegations are explained in detail, then when it turns out to be BS, it's rembered and the persons life is a living hell throughout and afterwards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #7 Posted October 10, 2018 No. Angel1.  Really? You seem to be trying a police officer for not assisting someone being stabbed.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
K1Machine   10 #8 Posted October 10, 2018 Should people be named, with out being charged for any offense, trial by mob media.  If the accusation is made by a female then trial by media is fine in my book. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
RootsBooster   24 #9 Posted October 10, 2018 Should people be named, with out being charged for any offense, trial by mob media. I don't think it's as straight forward as some people might think.  If there was a man or woman in Sheffield suspected of a very serious crime, sexual assault of a child for example, that person could potentially be a major danger to your children, with them at serious risk without you knowing. On the other hand if they are innocent the stigma of the accusation and the ignorant perceptions of the general public could ruin their lives anyway.  The more serious the crime, the more at risk people would be if the suspect is secretly guilty, while at the same time they are more likely to have their lives ruined if they are innocent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Padders   2,833 #10 Posted October 10, 2018 Cliff Richard springs to mind here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
woodview   10 #11 Posted October 10, 2018 I don't think it's as straight forward as some people might think. If there was a man or woman in Sheffield suspected of a very serious crime, sexual assault of a child for example, that person could potentially be a major danger to your children, with them at serious risk without you knowing. On the other hand if they are innocent the stigma of the accusation and the ignorant perceptions of the general public could ruin their lives anyway.  The more serious the crime, the more at risk people would be if the suspect is secretly guilty, while at the same time they are more likely to have their lives ruined if they are innocent. It might be approprate naming them if they were on the run and at large in the community. But it more frequently happens when allegations appear, not when they are actually being hunted by police. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
truman   10 #12 Posted October 10, 2018 If the accusation is made by a female then trial by media is fine in my book.  Why?................ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
