SiSiSi   10 #1 Posted September 30, 2015 Russia now bombing Syria, along with USA, UK, Jordan and just about every other country with an Air Force! How come they still appear to be winning? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Timeh   10 #2 Posted September 30, 2015 I was telling people months ago this would happen. Months ago! Its been on the cards since America put their puppet into the Ukraine to take Russia's eye off Syria. Weve got some bad times on the horizon. This isnt going to stay in Syria for long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Harleyman   12 #3 Posted October 1, 2015 According to CNN this morning the Russians are carrying out air strikes against Syrian rebels and NOT ISIS. Putin tells US air force to stay out of Syria. Pentagon quote "taken aback" by Russian actions. Interesting times ahead !  I think NORAD will be able to take out Russian missiles before they reach Alaska but Putin might just be able to hit major western European cities before Moscow is burned to rubble.  Doctor Strangelove good to see you back Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Gamston   10 #4 Posted October 1, 2015 Channels of communication are to be established . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Vague_Boy   10 #5 Posted October 1, 2015 I think NORAD will be able to take out Russian missiles before they reach Alaska but Putin might just be able to hit major western European cities before Moscow is burned to rubble.  I should point out that Russia has 24 operational nuclear submarines [LINK]. Some of these will be on station off the US coast (in international waters). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
DnAuK Â Â 10 #6 Posted October 1, 2015 And here we have Mr Corbyn claiming he wouldn't use nuclear weapons under any circumstances (thereby rendering them useless as a deterrent). The way this is going, he may never get chance to... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Anna B Â Â 1,414 #7 Posted October 1, 2015 This needs very careful independent monitoring. I believe we are not getting honest information on what's really happening, and haven't been for a while. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
slordy71 Â Â 10 #8 Posted October 1, 2015 This needs very careful independent monitoring. I believe we are not getting honest information on what's really happening, and haven't been for a while. Â i think we need to keep our nose out of Russia s business and let him get on with it! at last something is being done, the rebels and IS need to be stopped, then we might be able to get the situation stabilised. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
whiteowl   54 #9 Posted October 1, 2015 i think we need to keep our nose out of Russia s business and let him get on with it! at last something is being done, the rebels and IS need to be stopped, then we might be able to get the situation stabilised.  Are you aware that the West (including the UK) support the rebels in their attempts to overthrow the Assad regime ? And that if Russia start hitting the US backed and armed rebel groups, the US might not take too kindly to that I don't think anyone has any objection to Russia hitting ISIS but it appears they are not doing that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Timeh   10 #10 Posted October 1, 2015 This needs very careful independent monitoring. I believe we are not getting honest information on what's really happening, and haven't been for a while.  Some of us have but then that depends on where you look for the news. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
slordy71 Â Â 10 #11 Posted October 1, 2015 Are you aware that the West (including the UK) support the rebels in their attempts to overthrow the Assad regime ? And that if Russia start hitting the US backed and armed rebel groups, the US might not take too kindly to that I don't think anyone has any objection to Russia hitting ISIS but it appears they are not doing that. Â yes i am aware but as the Assad gov is a legitimate gov at the moment we should support that instead of sitting by on the sidelines and chucking a few munitions at rebels, the US wont do anything and Putin knows it. why should Putin be selective?? both sides are attacking his Ally? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
drummonds   10 #12 Posted October 1, 2015 And here we have Mr Corbyn claiming he wouldn't use nuclear weapons under any circumstances (thereby rendering them useless as a deterrent). The way this is going, he may never get chance to...  he also opposes nato membership. nato is pretty handy at times as an aggressor knows that it has rather more to deal with than just one adversary. but then corbyn wants to flush that down the bog as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...