Jump to content

Russia now bombing Syria

Recommended Posts

Russia now bombing Syria, along with USA, UK, Jordan and just about every other country with an Air Force!

How come they still appear to be winning?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was telling people months ago this would happen. Months ago! Its been on the cards since America put their puppet into the Ukraine to take Russia's eye off Syria.

Weve got some bad times on the horizon. This isnt going to stay in Syria for long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to CNN this morning the Russians are carrying out air strikes against Syrian rebels and NOT ISIS. Putin tells US air force to stay out of Syria. Pentagon quote "taken aback" by Russian actions. Interesting times ahead !

 

I think NORAD will be able to take out Russian missiles before they reach Alaska but Putin might just be able to hit major western European cities before Moscow is burned to rubble.

 

Doctor Strangelove good to see you back :hihi:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Channels of communication are to be established .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think NORAD will be able to take out Russian missiles before they reach Alaska but Putin might just be able to hit major western European cities before Moscow is burned to rubble.

 

I should point out that Russia has 24 operational nuclear submarines [LINK]. Some of these will be on station off the US coast (in international waters).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here we have Mr Corbyn claiming he wouldn't use nuclear weapons under any circumstances (thereby rendering them useless as a deterrent). The way this is going, he may never get chance to...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This needs very careful independent monitoring. I believe we are not getting honest information on what's really happening, and haven't been for a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This needs very careful independent monitoring. I believe we are not getting honest information on what's really happening, and haven't been for a while.

 

i think we need to keep our nose out of Russia s business and let him get on with it! at last something is being done, the rebels and IS need to be stopped, then we might be able to get the situation stabilised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i think we need to keep our nose out of Russia s business and let him get on with it! at last something is being done, the rebels and IS need to be stopped, then we might be able to get the situation stabilised.

 

Are you aware that the West (including the UK) support the rebels in their attempts to overthrow the Assad regime ?

And that if Russia start hitting the US backed and armed rebel groups, the US might not take too kindly to that :(

I don't think anyone has any objection to Russia hitting ISIS but it appears they are not doing that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This needs very careful independent monitoring. I believe we are not getting honest information on what's really happening, and haven't been for a while.

 

Some of us have but then that depends on where you look for the news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you aware that the West (including the UK) support the rebels in their attempts to overthrow the Assad regime ?

And that if Russia start hitting the US backed and armed rebel groups, the US might not take too kindly to that :(

I don't think anyone has any objection to Russia hitting ISIS but it appears they are not doing that.

 

yes i am aware but as the Assad gov is a legitimate gov at the moment we should support that instead of sitting by on the sidelines and chucking a few munitions at rebels, the US wont do anything and Putin knows it.

why should Putin be selective?? both sides are attacking his Ally?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And here we have Mr Corbyn claiming he wouldn't use nuclear weapons under any circumstances (thereby rendering them useless as a deterrent). The way this is going, he may never get chance to...

 

he also opposes nato membership. nato is pretty handy at times as an aggressor knows that it has rather more to deal with than just one adversary. but then corbyn wants to flush that down the bog as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.