Obelix   11 #121 Posted May 28, 2013 Which part of what Suffragette said are you claiming says women shouldn't be allowed to appear on page 3? I can't see her say that anywhere.  Banning it generally tends to stop them appearing on it I find.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Happ Hazzard   10 #122 Posted May 28, 2013 Why don't the feminists boycott the stores that sell lads mags? If there are enough people that agree with them, the stores will be forced to change their policies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #123 Posted May 28, 2013 Banning it generally tends to stop them appearing on it I find....  Suffragette hasn't said she wants to ban anything. You're just inventing stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Hots on   10 #124 Posted May 28, 2013 (edited) I don't think that having female photographers makes any difference tbh.  I think it does; it scotches the myth propagated by ultra feminists that the glamour industry is all about seedy men cajoling women to take off their clothes for the camera practically against their will. Edited May 28, 2013 by Hots on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #125 Posted May 28, 2013 Suffragette hasn't said she wants to ban anything. You're just inventing stuff.  *sigh*  Post #50  I personally don't support banning them. I do support the ban of page 3 though, if men and women want to look at naked breasts, there are plenty of magazines and online sites available for them to do do. It's outdated, sexist and inappropriate and should be consigned to history. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #126 Posted May 28, 2013 *sigh* Post #50  Fair do's, must have missed that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Hots on   10 #127 Posted May 28, 2013 I personally don't support banning them. I do support the ban of page 3 though, if men and women want to look at naked breasts, there are plenty of magazines and online sites available for them to do do. It's outdated, sexist and inappropriate and should be consigned to history.  Says who?....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #128 Posted May 28, 2013 I think it does; it scotches the myth propagated by ultra feminists that the glamour industry is all about seedy men cajoling women to take off their clothes for camera practically against their will.  I think you're out of date by a long way regarding current feminist thinking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #129 Posted May 28, 2013 Fair do's, must have missed that.  No worries. I was beginning to think I'd mucked up at first as I went past it twice without seeing it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Happ Hazzard   10 #130 Posted May 28, 2013 People who want to ban things generally aren't very "liberal". What has happened to the left in this country? When did they become the prudish, control freaks? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Chris_Sleeps   10 #131 Posted May 28, 2013 Says who?....... Me, for one. Page 3 is pointless. It's ugly. It's at the shallowest end of porn and serves no purpose in a newspaper.  However, I wouldn't ban it. I just hope that one day it'll be left behind as fashion moves on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Hots on   10 #132 Posted May 28, 2013 People who want to ban things generally aren't very "liberal". What has happened to the left in this country? When did they become the prudish, control freaks?  The left have always been control freaks but being prudish is relatively new; I think its because they're now in cahoots with radical Islam. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...