Hugh Hefner passes away

And his 31 year old wife (60 years younger than him) is getting 'nowt' in inheritance.

Why would she? He treated women like objects.

Why would she? He treated women like objects.

What do you mean with t h the above quote?

What do you mean with t h the above quote?

Exactly what I said.

Exactly what I said.

What objects?

Why would she? He treated women like objects.

Sorry Halibut, but at a guess those women chose to be treat like that if that is the case, your hyper feminist portrayal doesn't wash, fortune and fame is enough for a lot of people and he gave quite a few of them both it seems.

Loathsome individual who built an empire exploiting women.

Donated fortunes to charity for conservation and animal rights.

Also a big advocator for legalising same sex marriage.

Did you know that?

I didn't know him, have never read playboy, probably the same for you. I don't know if he was loathsome or not.

I suppose you couldn't wait for the Hugh Hefner thread to start could you? Straight in with the old virtue signalling.

Face facts .. he was not much more than an upmarket pimp...

Why would she? He treated women like objects.

Lol, he wasn't a white slave trader, he didn't go out there fishing for them, they went flocking to him, with stars and $ signs in their eyes. Stop chaining yourself to railings already. Women have more bloody rights than men these days. Your work is done.

Lol, he wasn't a white slave trader, he didn't go out there fishing for them, they went flocking to him, with stars and $ signs in their eyes. Stop chaining yourself to railings already. Women have more bloody rights than men these days. Your work is done.

Absolute nonsense.

---------- Post added 29-09-2017 at 15:58 ----------

Donated fortunes to charity for conservation and animal rights.

 

Also a big advocator for legalising same sex marriage.

 

Did you know that?

 

Yes I did, but it doesn't negate the fact that he built an empire on objectifying and selling women - you might think that's admiral; I think it's morally repugnant.

He had a good innings considering his lifestyle

I think he had good reason to keep going.

---------- Post added 29-09-2017 at 16:05 ----------

Loathsome individual who built an empire exploiting women.

Don't you mean they exploited him for money.

Absolute nonsense.

 

---------- Post added 29-09-2017 at 15:58 ----------

 

 

Yes I did, but it doesn't negate the fact that he built an empire on objectifying and selling women - you might think that's admiral; I think it's morally repugnant.

I don’t think that would be admirable if he’s objectified women - no. Why would I?

i also read about the esteemed writers that used to write in playboy, not that i ever read any i was too busy looking at the pictures...errrrrrm i mean

I know. Used to checks dads out when I were a nipper. Thought females had staples in a certain part of their anatomy, until I saw one for real.