nutty34

I have infinity 1 with the HH6, never have to re-start and speed is constant. I upgraded to the HH6 as I was having issues with my old HH4. A bit annoyed that I had to pay £50 for the new hub but it has made a whole world of difference.

Interesting to note that people actually believe that Richard Branson has anything to do with Virgin media at all. To clarity NTL/TELEWEST pay Virgin to use the Virgin name.

Where is the pond in Ecclesfield please ?

Never let the cold stop me. I often question my sanity following a really cold day on the bank:loopy:

Roundwood in Rotherham. Stuffed with big carp, has pegs close to the road and night fishing can be booked via 6am tackle shop. Good venue but the road down to the pond is a little bumpy Clearwater lake at Ranskil is also worth a look.

Fair enough. I knew one of the sites in that area flooded a few years ago

Is this not the place that flooded really badly not so long ago ?

I have moved from DR to BT, in a nutshell BT will tell you they can not use the existing line as it is connected to BT. They will then offer to install a new line at a cost of £125. Stand your ground and tell them you would like Infinty (2) but are not prepared to pay. I did this, they said they would install the line free but continued to use my DR line when they arrived which just disconnected my DR service. It means having a new telephone number but hey ho ! I have to say my Infinity 2 connection is far superior than my DR connection ever was.

You will be able to watch the sub free HD channels but if you want to record you have to pay Sky for the privilidge

Mole smokes finish them off big style, but are they not a protected species ?

No I mean argue.

I have to agree, there are several members who have contributed to this thread that would argue with anyone who does not share their opinion.

Totally agree, every person has the right to decide if they wish to be photographed or not

Fact - From personal experience this is in no way nonsensical. I am really, really surprised how dismissive of every day dangers to our youngsters, some members on here are.

@boyfriday :hihi: Answered on several occasions further back in the thread.

They do yes !

I see where you are coming from but a photograph in town is just that, the point I was trying to make much earlier was that a swimming lesson would be same place, same time each week for the child with the protection order to be if seen by child's family. It is highly unlikely that the same child would be say in the same park/town at the same time each week

Head and brick wall come to mind. Thanks for the lively debate all. Good night

And others aught to realise what sort of society we live in today

In fairness Jane I see what you are saying ..... But .... You can not ban people from a public place unless you know they are a wrong-un, you can however minimise any risk by banning certain things being used in a place such as a swimming baths.

I think we are in a minority here

I fully agree, I have no issue what so ever of any parent taking pictures of their own children. All I am suggesting is a real life reason based on personal experience as to why there are issues with photographing children other than your own.

I have to agree with some of what you have posted you clearly have seen zero evidence. Just because you organise CRB checking and safeguarding training it does not classify you as an expert in this field, where I work for instance our HR manager arranges the things you do but she has little or no experience in cases such as I offered earlier. All I am asking is to consider that things like this actually do go on, more local than you would care to believe and more often too. Some of the things some of these kids go through would make your skin crawl. As someone who is involved first hand I am offering a differing opinion. If I have offended anyone then apologies it was not intended but when you are closely involved it becomes something you are more aware of than most.

To be fair parental permission does actually mean something. None of the kids in this photo will be in protective local authority care which is the scenario I offered earlier to support why said swimming pool bans cameras. Again I really have no issue with anyone using a camera, all I was suggesting was one mitigating reason as to why cameras were banned. ---------- Post added 20-07-2013 at 23:36 ---------- If what you say is true then I am really surprised that you make fun of these situations. You would have thought that you would have seen enough real life evidence to prevent you making a joke of what can be a really harrowing time for a child. Again my experience is first hand, not rabid media propaganda as you suggest. Maybe you are in the wrong job ?

I am pretty sure this will have been done with full parental permission.