Sausage Dog

You used to cringe, but now you don't.

You're very funny! Have you thought about trying the Comedy Club?

No doubt you'd be complaining if your neighbour built something without planning permission?

He's probably a creationist who thinks it has only been there for 6,500 years anyway, and that god made it for us to do with as we want. ---------- Post added 19-10-2013 at 20:08 ---------- There's every chance one of those stones of the Pyramids could fall off and kill someone - better knock them down. As for Stonehenge, have you seen how precarious that looks?

So one very rich athlete and her trainer have access to world class facilities. Just a thought.

5000 signatures needed. If 5000 people regularly used it, may be it wouldn't be closing. Just a thought.

This is just the people sleeping on the street. I've no idea what the real figures are, but as the following website says http://www.crisis.org.uk/pages/homeless-def-numbers.html However, the problem of homelessness is much bigger than that of rough sleeping. As the previous Government stated: "the vast majority of homeless people are actually families or single people who are not literally sleeping on the streets but living with relatives and friends or in temporary accommodation"

It's all getting a bit like asking "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin". Key thing is whether it's far right or far left, they both have intolerance of others, and a certain belief in their own narrow view. Both types are best avoided in my view.

You mean like Hitler left Jews to their own devices?

Seems to me that the far right and the far left have a lot in common in terms of their general intolerance and the total belief in the own views (you might call it blind faith). It's the same with the likes of the EDL and Islamic fundamentalists - they have so much in common, if only they could see it. As the saying goes, if you far enough in one direction, you'll meet yourself coming back

Few points on this. On the face of it, it seems like a good idea, getting good food into the mouths of kids (if you give parents the cash in the form of benefits, you've no idea what they will spend it on). There's some practical questions though: Is the £600 million just for the food? What about the capital costs that schools will have - kitchen facilities that might not be big enough? What about the cost of employing extra 'dinner ladies'? Is this covered? Will dinner halls be able to cope with giving all kids the meals? If not, will there be capital costs to extend/modify dinner halls? I'm not even going to mention the various dietary requirements that kids have these days (oh, I have). How are these going to be catered for? Has this been thought out, or was it just a conference policy announcement to grab some good headlines for Clegg?

RMBC seems to be in meltdown at the moment. One their top Directors is currently (neutrally) suspended over alegations about his behaviour, and this can't be too much of a career boost for the Director of Childrens Services. On top of the MP resignation, should make for an interesting by election.

Not many people know anything about the PCC elections, I don't know anything about you. Doesn't equal secrative.

About sums it up for me.

Question to you TV, what type of person has the time or inclination to watch Jeremy Kyle?