Jump to content

Rudders

Banned
  • Content Count

    238
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Neutral

About Rudders

  • Rank
    Registered User
  1. Pity, as it would stop endless immigration into our City as the Labourites wouldn't have a say anymore as they sold Sheffield out on the basis that it was cash for immigrants.
  2. Your party in power (Nu-Labour) are responsible for the mess we find ourselves in right now. Do you agree or disagree?
  3. Can all of you choose not to vote BNP and tow the Conservative party line? We can't retract what is here or has been acted upon in the name of the Nu-Labour government, they have been utter fools in their time and their policies are becoming ever more apparent to this day. I am not saying that the Conservative party have all the answers but they have the will to stem the tide of immigration as they don't need immigrant votes and they are best placed to get us out of a depression as history has proven in the past. Socialism costs more than we can afford, even in the boom years, proven by Nu-Labour. We are in a bad state now, so any vote for the Lib-Dems or any other far out there party is a lost vote. We need to concentrate on what is good for us all right now and its not Nu-Labour.
  4. Some automatics don't have catalytic converter exhausts but whatever they have to do with with bump starting an engine with an automatic gearbox is beyond me? You simply can't do it.
  5. I talked to a friend of mine today involved with IT and all its gadgets and I put it to him that if I want to view the BBC from abroad on my computer then why can't I be issued with a PIN number that I can do so? He said in all honesty that as an IT consultant that I could give that PIN number out to anyone as far as the BBC could be concerned. Hence my assertion that the BBC will plan a new offensive on taking money from broadband users who will have no say whatsover in paying a licensed users fee for watching the BBC even if they never watch TV on a computer and he agree's that we are seeing the stepping stone to this. The licensing agency responsible for gathering the money will have their job made much more easy, the internet is now becoming a new stealth tax that we are going to have to become aware of in many guises. Frightening.
  6. I don’t think they did. You say you organised a protest, yes you did, around the BNP conducting a meeting at a pub that was being refurbished but obviously no-one bothered to remember that so they had to change venue but your group still turned up and all the evidence for doing that when there was no need to points to the fact that you wanted to intimidate the pub licencee into never allowing them a stage to talk again... is this what you mean by you supporting freedom of speech? Are you denying that the UAF film the BNP? You need to show me where I said that wildcat, I think your version makes no sense either. You are not whiter than white and a bit of honesty goes a long way. Squirming makes you look snake like.
  7. Maybe I should have said a bit suspect about you wildcat but you knew what I meant anyway. You still didn’t take on board the point that the UAF were not all blameless here and I haven’t taken either side hook line and sinker and with your constant squirming and avoiding the issue painting yourself whiter than white, I am less inclined to take your word the more I read of you. I will be very careful with my grammar in future as you seem to use any mistake to your advantage not to give a straight answer. I think I have it now though in your non-answer. Yes I have wildcat, through some of your financial backers and supporters, so when are you going to eject the SWP/MCB/Respect alliance who back this fascist and racist terrorist group (Hamas) from your organisation as they stand against everything you fight for? Or is the money too important? Why as usual? I back any government that denounces and breaks ties from a group sworn to kill another nation full stop, no ifs or buts. Just like you are sworn to wipe out fascism, oops! Sorry, I forgot, you are funded by fascist supporters. Lol, why are you defending a fascist and racist terrorist organisation? http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article721211.ece I can find numerous links and the last conflict only proves you wrong even more. Are my questions too difficult for you? Well, do you remember saying that the BNP attacked all those innocent pensioners, women and children? (as if the press wouldn’t have had a field day with that?) well, here is an innocent defenceless woman being attacked by PSC/SWP supporters for decrying the war in Israel/Gaza... see why you are so unbelievable in what you accuse the BNP of , yet you dismiss your own anti-fascist wrong doings so easily out of hand. Your peaceful group attacked an innocent woman. Did she not support Hamas? I don’t think she did, hence the reaction? I know, the west have declared them terrorists and for good reason and the Arab world haven’t. No surprises then They provide figures on how childbirth in this Country has rissen by 77% over the last 10yrs from Mothers not even born here and its not as if they keep in those figures which Mothers then go on to take their children back to their original Country, that would be impossible to do. You cannot deny that women are having babies here at our expense and then moving on. Not all immigrants contribute to the economy. A house of Lords report earlier last year (I think) stated that immigration has brought no overall gain to the economy, in fact it has added to the strain on public services and housing. You question me on my presence on this thread? Here’s a clue... “public forum.” I’m well aware of your presence here, you said as much as in to fight fascism on forums except you don’t like to be on the other end of a question. Why should I defend the extreme left when I have a dislike for extremism? You try to deny the BNP the freedom of speech, how do you square that one? Peaceful protest is another matter. Leave the hammers at home. There is a time to protest, why can’t you do it like everyone else at a designated place and time in a City centre or something instead of following a legal party around and intimidating them when they are going about their lawful business? You don’t seek to deny them their legal rights or freedom of speech? Please! It doesn’t matter who the organisation is if they are supporting terror, you should not be accepting money from them as you are just so damn hypocrital for doing so and it makes you look fools for money. You are dealing with a fascist organisation... how mad is that? But you have fascist supporting organisations in your ranks and you take money from them?
  8. It could well be that the BBC might charge the current licence fee of ÂŁ139.50 for people watching TV on the net. They seem to have a lot of difficulty in collecting this outdated tax from everyone. Something similar happened in Denmark some time back where their equivalent of our BBC put a catch up service on the net followed by live streaming as here and then lobbied the government to charge all broadband users the fee on top of their subscription. What an underhand way to be guaranteed your fee for all the repeats they regurgitate and the money they pay the likes of Jonathan Ross? The majority of homes are on broadband today and you can't deny being there or having a computer even if you never use it to watch TV. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1166161/License-fee-police-target-watching-TV-Net.html Who thinks we should drop the licence fee and let the Beeb advertise like the other channels? If I'm abroad, I can't access catch up on the Beeb anyway as it will only allow a UK IP address access even though I have a licence.
  9. It seems odd that a meeting was arranged in a place undergoing refurbishment in the first place don’t you think? They seem to feel that the owner of the venue was threatened with his alcohol licence if he let it go ahead. I think the question that should be asked is what were your group doing there when you planned your demonstration around their meeting and venue when you were well aware that it had been cancelled. Why did you bother turning up at all? You say it shows considerable restraint them not punching a BNP cameraman filming them but I know your organisation do exactly the same to them and as you keep harping back to the youtube link that Streamline put on, by your own admission they were just some distressed looking middle aged women. I think they had a little more firepower from the press reports.
  10. I never said I did entirely but then again its not so clear cut and you cannot tell me that the UAF are completely innocent in all this. Surely the press would be sticking up for you and would print the facts as you see them on your UAF site but they don’t. In fact no-where else does. Can you see why I am a bit suspect? I think you just choose to ignore the links I gave you, the facts won’t go away you know. The MCB give you money and it’s up to the government if they see them as a destabilising and terrorist threat, not me. They are not a resistance organisation, they have stated that their aim is to kill all Jews and annihilate the state of Israel. How can Israel seek peace with them? That is blatant fascism and racism. Something you are supposed to be against. I don’t, I seek answers from you. Can’t you see what is going on? I’ll tell you so what... a peaceful protester was attacked by a supposed anti-fascist rally by PSC/SWP members for decrying not only Hamas but the IDF as well, it shows tempers flared that day by pro-Palestinian supporters and in one instant the pro-Palestinian rally lost its cause and its meaning because it couldn’t help but become violent towards an innocent woman. I think that’s despicable and it says everything about what PSC/SWP stand for and all these close links that feed the UAF who take their money puts them in bed with these people. You didn’t mind saying how bad the BNP were for taking money out of Libya earlier on and I see no difference here. It is not my designation of Hamas being a terrorist organisation, that honour was granted them by the international community. A link for a link then wildcat: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1572145/One-in-five-babies-born-to-foreign-mother-in-UK.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7215624.stm You skirt the issues on the UAF/SWP links with Hamas. Of course you can go anywhere in the world for medical surgery and you will pay for it, we have a free NHS here so maybe that is why we make a good destination to head for. What exactly is your purpose on the thread here? I think I ask you some awkward questions that you don’t like to answer. I am here because like you, I can be. Is there any reason I shouldn’t be? My view is that people have the right to vote for who they wish and legal political parties have the right to meet without facing intimidation no matter how distasteful I find them. I also think that organisations like yours would be far more effective if they cut ties with certain organisations that I have mentioned, I also think the UAF gives the BNP a higher profile and more coverage as a result of your activities. You are their biggest advertisement.
  11. Which you know was cancelled, which is why you said "meant to be a BNP meeting," Why do you think they bothered turning up? Do you think it could have been to send out a clear message to the owner of the venue that this is what he could expect if he ever allowed them a stage again in the future? Bully tactics? Surely its not like the UAF to act in such a way?
  12. I'm sick and tired of getting sexually suggestive PM's, so much so that I don't even bother replying anymore so if you're thinking it, don't send it, you will be wasting your time. Yeah right!
  13. He would ban all extremist organisations... assuming he existed.
  14. You gave me a biased link, equivalent to the BNP homepage that states quite the opposite and you also include bloggers (booted out members of the BNP with an axe to grind) as your sources of truth. Will you accept the BNP version of events on their website? I doubt you will. What I asked you for was independent proof of events as your UAF site describes and you can't come up with any. You can be "affiliated", associated, or be a member of any organisation and not deal financially with them, yet UAF are actively funded by the organisations I have mentioned and they all have clear links to Hamas. Why do you do business with them and accept money if you know this... its a bit like the BNP taking money from Gaddafi is it not? I don't get ideas and we have been here before, If PSC are so impartial and anti-racist then why did the SWP join forces with them and attack an anti-war demonstrator in Sheffield? Its no use saying they shouldn't have, I already knew that. The groups I have cited are clearly not opposed to terrorism in case you can't read the links. The government have even broken relations with the Muslim Council of Britain over their support for Hamas, George Galloway was banned from Canada for funding Hamas and the SWP have made it plain who they support on the streets of Sheffield. Yes it would be absurd to say it never happens and there is no other reason than to single out India and Pakistan as they seem to be the largest in numbers followed by eastern Europe. Its not dubious by any means, only in your mind as you would like to paint me as having an agenda. You constantly skirt the issues that make you feel uncomfortable and are very selective in your answers... tell me that these organisations have no links whatsoever to Hamas with a bit of proof for a change.
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.