Stan Tamudo

I don't think Sheffield is ready for my voice but thanks for the offer.

We're well used to it by now Smithy.

Isnt it down to the poor to help themselves ? Why should the successful have to subsidize the poor. ?

That's what you did isn't it Desmundo? I remember when you were on the dole, doing a bit of fiddle on the side. Now you're a successful entrepreneur with a portfolio of student lets. I bet you love listening to that Tony Bennett song whilst puffing on a knocked off fag and supping some bootleg booze.

I would go by what your daughter thinks, you are less well off than some but better off than 90% of the worlds population, 6,500,070,214: people are earning less than you and I haven't included the £5,000ish that you likley receive in tax credits or the HB that you are very likley to receive.

Are we back Smithy?

http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?p=10683403&highlight=likley#post10683403

http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?p=9707127&highlight=likley#post9707127

http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?p=9559633&highlight=likley#post9559633

I had a walk around Damflask today and the water level is low. The Pike anglers seem to like it, quite a few of them fishing today.

Turns out that we weren't "all in to together", after all.....

Fancy the Tories helping the rich by hitting the poor. I'm shocked!

Sarcasm as usual Stan...

You know me love!

So your opinion counts for what?

 

How do most people on here consider you, LOL

He's well respected is H.

That's what the "good will" element of accounting is all about!

 

Even you stated earlier it was partly due to high labour costs!

 

---------- Post added 15-11-2014 at 21:12 ----------

 

 

You drunk and not adding anything except foul language to the discussion again?

How dare you, you Neoliberal scoundrel!

So you have no answers to your unreason rant! Again!

You've got the hump again haven't you?

What's going on here tonight?

A good article that I thought i'd share

 

---------- Post added 15-11-2014 at 20:05 ----------

 

Here's the main points:

 

 

 

So basically more unions tends to lead to less jobs and businesses... The logic makes well reasoned sense![/QUOTE]

 

It makes no sense whatsoever, anybody who's worked and lived through the last thirty years knows you're talking bull****!

Guess which Sheffield Forumer is which?

http://i1.wp.com/leftycartoons.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2014/03/unionize-top-ten-color.jpg?resize=675%2C655

My mate Desmundo is on the bottom, second from the right.

You wouldn't believe me if I told you the truth will set you free!

 

In the few weeks i've been on here i've been labeled a fascist, a racist, an idiot, friendless, lifeless, jobless, druggie, smackrat, homophobic, a Christian, inept, unable to write coherent sentences and many more, so, now being labeled a female law student comes as a nice surprise.

 

I'm glad you see me as virtuous and fair, thankyou!

The Tamudo charm works its magic.

I take it you agree with the logic!

 

 

Even Liberalism doesn't agree with being unfair to the rich simply for being rich! In essence it makes doing well a crime!

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism#Liberal_economic_theory

My heart bleeds. How's the Law degree going girl?

You have illustrated a good point here!

 

If we had hiked up business tax, then these fleeing businesses would have been fleeing from here! But now we get 45% of something and not 50% of nothing, we get the associated jobs too!

The silver tongued defender of the rich and privileged rides again. Are you a law student by any chance?

How much should you be paid for making sandwiches?

I should imagine it depends on what type of sandwich is being made.

Just look at the state of the unemployed in this country though. Most are dossiers apart from those unable to work due to ill health. Companies like foreign workers because they work hard, don't complain and get on with what they're paid to do. Most unemployed young British people have lousy attitude towards work and that's the problem.

........Oh dear!

Evans should have been sacked immediately after his conviction. I can't for the life of me understand why a stand at the oldest major football ground in the world was named after someone who has nothing to do with the game?

I can see what you did there

Did I forget to use a full stop?

Indeed, but if you earn below a certain figure (north of circa £25K) then you are a net drain on the economy, and yes the middle classes, the working poor and the rich are all having to pay for the excesses of the Labour years in office. We are all in this together. We are all having to pay for the mistakes and profligacy of Brown, Darling and Blair.

That's New Labour for you Ron. Margaret Thatcher's greatest legacy.

you lefties never answer the question

What's the question Ron?

LOL. Minister of Welfare please. It's got my name on it.

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2014 at 22:41 ----------

 

 

This? ........

What do you want me to say Ron?

Without wading through the whole thread...why was housing bequeathed to "social housing" sold off to a multinational hedge fund?

Opportunity Knocks for these entrepreneurs.

Appearances can be deceptive

I've got you weighed up Ron and you're ok. We'll find a good use for you after the Revolution.