Delayed

Thanks for that reminder of what I posted. Nope, id have been laughing at the absurdity. Which is why I'm laughing at my post. It's called satire

True but you and I both know someone would try to make that connection

All those immigrants on small boats having babies free on the NHS so they can then get council housing quicker... : 😂

No let's not confuse immigration limits with Asylum limits. You asked if there should be limits to small boat arrivals who claim asylum and I said no because you can't and no other countries do. We can limit the number of visas we issue for certain categories.

Read the thread. I'm not playing 20 questions with you.

I know. Amazing how people don't understand the asylum system

There's no limit in any country for anyone seeking asylum No Everyone that is genuinely seeking asylum then yes. You're asking the same questions over and over and not understanding

It's not closing a loophole though is it?. The Rwanda Scheme does not prevent people arriving by boat and claiming asylum.

How are you not getting this? My position is and always has been no one knows so you can't assume they are all disingenuous You're assuming the reasons for claiming asylum are war related which Ive told you numerous times

No because it's nothing of the sort. Claiming asylum isn't a loophole. If it's such a loophole why is no government doing anything to close it?

No it's not ignored No that's not true The asylum claim over rides the illegal entry which is why no one is sent to prison over it.

And the law

But people who make the Channel crossing are protected by international law if they claim asylum once they arrive. No crime committed

My post

As explained so many times none of those are crimes..

Read the entire thread instead of trying to be clever and quoting out of context.

Clothing, footwear, hairstyle, ears, eyes

All probably dobe during lockdown. I bet you do none of those things now because it's no longer an issue (like it ever was) Nothing because our freedoms aren't being taken away. There are no mandates. You're protesting against nothing. You just don't like people wearing masks still and you can't accept it. I seriously hope you do confront someone and it turns out to be the wrong person and you get told to mind your own sodding business. The irony of you protesting against a government supposedly telling you what to do and yet you want to do the same to the general public. Sod off

Because you don't mention anything in regards to action. You just cry about what people do and hypotheticals about what should be done.

Too bad. You have no right to dictate what others do and if you do happen to confront anyone about it, I hope you get told to foxtrot oscar. Though I think you are just all bluster on this forum.

Yeah well clearly you don't have much faith in saying 'No' as you're predicting it'll happen again. And of course saying 'No' the first time went so well 😀

Exactly....HAVE....... Mandates are Not in pubs or on buses NOW. Clearly the pub you were in with this person didn't have a mandate otherwise you'd be going somewhere else. If people still want to wear masks then they will and you'll just have to accept it.

It's all down to the development of vaccines but if you want to believe the government caved into protests then go ahead..

That's my point Sherlock. There's no such mandate so it's entirely a person's decision to wear a mask as no one is being forced. He can get on a bus as normal with or without one.

What difference does it make to you? I was on a bus with an old man wearing a mask. We kept ourselves to ourselves and thought nothing more of it. Let people live their own lives