Delayed

Yes you've got it wrong. I've always said that I agree with the reasons why the school has a ban in place. So nowhere am I restricting you or telling you what you can and can't do.

Yes they do. It's just that the media only report on the worst case scenarios to drum up hate.

Feel free to share with the group where I am telling people what to do and how to live their lives? We do live in a free country. It's why we have many people making the journey here. Don't like it? Go emigrate to North Korea or the Middle East. Then see how much freedom you get.

It's never been about that. He just doesn't like being told no

Speak for yourself. I’ve followed the rules, had my vaccines and paid no price and enjoying life as Covid is no longer an issue.

The home office do have chartered flights but they are very expensive and don't always guarantee full planes because of timings, last minute legal challenges, injunctions, doo gooders, lefty lawyers etc. So sometimes where only individuals are concerned then routine flights are used. At the end of the day it's all down to costs

She and every other passenger that stood up should be made aware of his crimes and pay for the costs of the aborted flight with a travel ban.

Perhaps I'm being flippant. I know it's not a prison in the exact sense but when it's deliberately intended to be a persons only source of shelter then psychologically it's a prison.

That doesn't specify new builds though. That's just a call to existing landlords

They can but it's basically an open prison

Doesn't appear to be lies but after the first few seconds the video is about the Home Office NOT housing migrants in new builds as they've not gone ahead with it. So it's not happening as I've said

Where's that cone from? Small boat arrivals are being housed in council housing,. hotels or a floating prison. The government can't house them in private build new housing.

Cut migration or make sure immigrants are earning enough to afford private housing. It doesn't mean we should stop migration altogether

I think that article is misleading. The government know they cannot deport a Brit Cit. That article says that the person is born in the UK and applied for a British passport. Being born in the UK does not automatically mean you are British. And if he's applied for a passport and not got one yet then he is eligible to be deported.

I'm not blindly agreeing with you so yeah....you will be assuming that I'm trolling.

I'm not answering 'What if' loaded questions. You don't like arguing so don't try and create an argument

I've already said.... The staff/owners and if she became that disruptive then the police.

7minutes ago, Al Bundy said: I do believe they are arguing for arguments sake.

Nothing funny about it. The woman's behaviour is deplorable and should be setting a better example. I just don't agree with it being the partners responsibility

Apologies that must be why you're got so many people agreeing with you on this thread No because they would be doing their job. But of course the woman can request female officers as you well know. Nice try

Then if the behaviour is disruptive enough the police need to get involved or the owners ban her from the takeaway. Which was already suggested

You're missing the point... You're upset that this man didn't control his woman (in your words) Which gives the reader the impression that you believe women need to be controlled by men.

"Control Your Woman?" "He should have controlled his woman." Yeah good job 👏

Not at all. But rather than suggesting this particular Man should CONTROL this particular woman as though he owns her IS sexist. My take on it would be that it's her responsibility to changer her behaviour

And before Daddy asks me where he has said that.... "He should have controlled his woman"