Delayed

Point proven. My child had to be educated from home. My mother in law was in a care home As was others in the UK and other countries So it's no more about excess deaths or lost generations but the inconvenience experienced by you. Which is evident from your other threads.

It's dressed up as concern for those poor children that had to be educated from home or the families that couldn't be with grandparents. In reality it's all about point scoring, finger pointing and being able to say 'look told you so'

Laughing stock? seems like all you are doing is crying about it

See what I mean about "moving on"?

No she acknowledged the point I was making and could've reworded her post differently like an adult. This is called an adult discussion

Good. I'm glad that you understand labelling and stereotyping is wrong hence why I ran to "mummy"

That's not what I'm getting at.

But Anna was saying that any Tory posters on here are devious. Completely inappropriate

Please don’t tar posters with an imaginary brush just because you don’t like this current government

A one sided post if ever I read one. Just to remind everyone that it is our resident Dr. Topps and Chekhov that seem incapable of moving on, needing to post links to stories that think prove their point and repeat posting of graphs and charts. If people really did wish to move on, this thread would’ve died at least a year ago.

In other words it's only you that keeps arguing

No, no one's going to continue arguing about it because it's already happened. You on the other hand

People are getting on with it bar a small minority that can't get over recent history

Doesn't matter. Thems the rules..... next?

I'm not a lefti

Again, why would his daughter lie? If it was a random person making that statement I'd be inclined to agree but his daughter would be a trustworthy source. I think you want it to be vaccine related

Life isn't fair, get used to it..

It wasn't to dismiss an Instagram rumour. It was in response to one of Jamies co workers that claim a blood clot was formed as a result of the vaccine he received for work. This co worker went public with the claim. So Jamie's daughter chose Instagram to respond, probably because she has a lot of followers. So, who's more likely to know? Random co worker or daughter? And who's more likely to lie or not know the truth?

What difference does it make if it's on Instagram? Does the basketball video make his daughter a liar?

Why do you think his daughter would make it all up? And what bits am I dismissing? You've said there isn't any info on either side, so what am I dismissing exactly? And aren't you doing exactly the same by dismissing the daughters statement?

https://youtu.be/rpkN0wiMK2Q

How about Fox's daughter also debunking the claims? https://www.indy100.com/celebrities/jamie-foxx-anti-vax-conspiracy

But when our BlackRock fearing posters on here make the first post linking Jamie Fox's issues to the vaccine, provide zero evidence of to back up their claims, then my link from his rep calling it out is far more than anything provided to the contrary. There is no detail either way. Doesn't mean I have to read baseless claims without disputing them.

No

Usually that the simplest answer is the truth and that it's all quiet because it's a private and sensitive matter.