liberty boy

just to get off the subject slightly, Stephen Fry is alright and he was non judgemental when talking about aids but I just feel as regards to the man in general he slightly gives the impression that he talks down slightly to the viewer. there's something a liitle bit irritating about his manner, i find personally

Are you saying then that if he was just a run of the mill BNP member-a member of britain's fourth most popular political party -without the stormfront inferences, you would have accepted his right to employment and left him unmolested? The usual excuse used by the left is that BNP supporters should be denied access to politically sensitive posts, where they might use their political opinion to gain sensitive imformation and to the detriment of society. To that end how precisely could a shop security guard propagate his politics? He's there simply to ward of shoplifters isn't he? Are you pretending he would have been more liberal on shoplifters if they were white?

Actually yes i agree with mods on this one. Previous forums like the Oxford forum became swamped in BNP threads. To the point that they practically killed the forum. To that end it does neither the party nor the casual forum member any good to get this stupid hyjacking of every thread. Whilst i understand the frustration as a BNP member that we're denied access to the media etc and the internet is our only recourse I do think genuine BNP supporters should behave more responsibly. To that end even though i'm a BNP supporter I'm also interested in non BNP related issues on this forum like the plight of Rare and raceys etc which should set me apart from the trolls and mishief makers from far and wide that just want to flood the forum with stupid cut and pastes from the BNP website.

We've just been talking in the pub about Stephen fry's programme about Aids. Apparently for anyone that didn't see it, it highlighted the case of a bouncer in Doncaster who has recently died of aids after infecting fifty women. The point is watch yourselves, now is not a good time to have an unprotected one night stand in Doncaster.

Well if you check out the thread on indymedia meet roy james you'll see the extent they were prepared to go to, ringing up the shop and all sorts Those who say the BNP are thugs need to check out antifa, they are a group expressly committed to violent suppression of the BNP. Their campaign of ouvert violence works in hand with less explicitly violent groups like Stop the BNP who at the moment are encouraging similar tactics as those used on the shop in the Moor against a hotel in Blackpool to intimidate the owners out of allowing a BNP conference on their premises. Even the suppliers are being initmidated. Great to live in a democracy isn't it? This is a violation of the basic human right in a democracy of freedom of association and freedom of political assembly and wouldn't be permitted in any other civilised country. Stop the BNP is organised by Searchlight who have charity status and significant Government and trade union support. In what other democracy does an organisation committed to harrassing, intimidating, and disrupting the political opponents of the government enjoy charity status?

I could try yes. But I'm not going to make contact with the local party as any sort of activist now i'm here In sheffield. I'm happy just to be a sort of passive member. As to the real nature of the BNP you'rd have to decide over it for yourself. I can only say really what makes me subscribe to them. I think race relations is a difficult area where people get extremely heated on all sides mainly because no one one feels they can say what they really want to say. And those that do say certain things can be pounced on with anger and venom. Still we can but do our best. As confucious said "honest man not worry if shadow appear crooked".

yes i'm sorry if it's been already discussed in here. The BNP mega thread just disappeared overnight, probably largely because it was just going round in circles. But at the time I just assumed the moderators were no longer allowing BNP supporters on the forum. And as i wasn't in sheffield anyway i stopped coming on.

yes sorry. I mean the BNP megathread should be reinstated i guess. I'm just pointing out that it ceased to be of interest because all it was discussing was whether Roj james was or wasn't a certain poster on stormfront. I'm just saying he's now not a BNP member as far as i know so maybe we can move on. Because in honesty I couldn't contribute to that discussion one way or the other.

The info on Roy by the way I gained from the private BNP members forum so i hope he doesn't mind me somewhat breaching confidentiality. The last he said on there was that he was pretty fed up with things.

As someone who was on this forum about two or three years ago arguing the BNP line, I would have to say in response to people who assumed we were thrown off, there was no particular reason why I stopped posting personally except that the one officially sanctioned BNP thread seemed to have been pulled. Moreover all the discussion seemed to centre on Roy james the then local BNP organiser - whom i don't know much about personally and whether or not he'rd been a regular member on an explicitly racist website. Having moved to Sheffield i've had to re-register simply because i forgot my original moniker and password from back then. Roy meanwhile i think for people's information has left the party. I understand he got a job in the Moor as a retail security guard whilst he was the sheffield BNP organiser and leftwing opponents to his political views hounded the shop until they got him sacked. I do think he apllied to the BNP legal department for help over this matter but became disillusioned with what he felt (for whatever reason they might have had) was a lack of support from them.