Supertramp

I think prison is what you are trying to describe.

Maybe they want a new vote.

They don't have experience and are likely to make an informed choice but I doubt they'd be any worse than a regular voter. Most people vote for the same party every time, lots vote on a single issue and you have people who are too influenced by so called 'news' papers and internet memes.

Not that I see anyway. What I see mainly is people changing lanes without looking, people sitting in the middle lane, tailgating (below the speed limit and above), people who speed up when you go to overtake and just generally can't stick to a constant speed. I also see the odd speeding car that is driving way too fast for the conditions but that's a lot rarer than the other idiocy I see.

If the speed differential is 20 miles per hour, it's going to be a lot more than a minute quicker isn't it unless you're making a very short journey. Instead of changing the speed limits or handing out fines, why don't we teach people how to drive properly. I see so much bad driving these days and I'm pretty sure it wasn't like this even like 8-10 years ago.

Nope! Don't want to be groped by old biddies.

Still the same in my family. But politicians were definitely less caring, let's try taking a quick look through history and see what our politicians got up to and what problems they caused throughout the world, never mind just here.

Politicians were more caring in the old days! You can't make this stuff up.

Probably people with Hotmail addresses have been found more likely to make a claim. That's how insurance quotes work (along with plucking figures out of the air)

Are you saying the Kurds went A whey?

Racism is not a problem, it's just lefties complaining. Those darkies should be happy we let them out of their chains. Now look at them getting all uppity trying to marry our royals. Or something along those lines. I think I've given up with internet people, how come we don't meet so many nobs in real life?

Is it a carpet

You do know that the government is not their only customer right?

Awesome, 20000 jobs about to get lost. Yay!

I think the reason for exposing it is pretty obvious. It's to show people Trump is an idiot.

Read all of Wikipedia? At least post a link.

I don't think that counts as a private meeting just because no press are present. That's like me at work in a meeting saying why have we got people coming from ****holes and taking our jobs.

Not sure this supports your argument.

There's no lily livered grass and this is not a privately expressed opinion, it was expressed to a room of cross party politicians.

I agree, the minor injuries unit should move to Northern General too. Then the triage nurse tells you which of the 3 you need. Or even the receptionist.

I don't think you know what ethnicity means.

Must be. Simple back of the fag packet calculations will tell you you can only have 3 butchers in 43sq miles else one is definitely a money laundering. However, butchers are not foreign so it's fine. And don't get me started on all the shops in meadowhall, I mean it's obvious that many shops altogether selling similar stuff cannot all be making money. God damn drug cartels, coming here, laundering money through Pizza Hut.

This is my point too. It's not the same job really, it's the same job title but that's a different thing surely. Do pizza hut pay a male in the UK the same as a female in Bangladesh? I doubt it. And in Pizza hut the job would be exactly the same. Chinese editor and US editor could be wildly different for all we know. US editor could have twice as many staff under him or half the number of staff.

Firstly, are they even the same jobs? She is international editor for one country? Jeremy Bowen covers several. Secondly Jeremy Bowen is in a war zone for half his life. And finally I think the rise would have out her equal to Jeremy Bowen? Also forgot to say, BBC only publish salaries of those earning over £150k so I would guess that the other international editors are below this threshold.

I don't know about that. But I wish people would stop making politics about one line catchphrases. Obviously some PR person has told them this is what eggs them votes but if Corbyn says for the many, not the few once more, I will go berserk.