tomarse

Hi boing, the prospects are really good apparently, many places on line support this and I know of a lot of people who have stated that they found work quite easily! I'm doing a 120 hour course myself with a guaranteed work placement at the end of it (it requires a degree though) to a number of selected countries from Spain, Ecuador, Japan and China etc.

Will you please substantiate these rather grand claims.

I addressed it many posts before the one you half quoted. Infact I'm pretty sure you half quoted the post I addressed it in and still haven't managed to address what I said. So I've had no need to address your posts sinse, my previous posts already do.

You're at it again! Don't worry, you're always going slow for me. Well, those people who 'claim to be religious' which I mentioned, they probably believe in a diety... see where I'm going? Ok, now for you to claim that someone is religious when they do not believe it themselves, a counter argument would be - 'I believe most people who believe themselves to be religious, aren't', which is what I said. I'm not going to elaborate further, that can be your homework set by another teacher, me.

I don't know why I'm still replying to him, he tells people what they believe then denies it, half quotes me in every single post he makes, argues with the Oxford dictionary, denies his own implications and then completely misinterprets the English language (either that or stops reading sentences half way through while pretending he's read the whole thing) Even my caps enhanced laughter didn't get the point across!

I've already refuted it and you ignored half of what I said so you could argue with the other half. You insulted me first btw with your 'I bet you do, got nothing eh?' statement to another half quote of mine so don't even consider getting high and mighty over it

MATE. YOU TOLD HIM HE WAS RELIGIOUS WHEN HE SAID HE WASN'T. And of course it's ****ing relevant, it's called a COUNTER ARGUMENT, you can't just say things aren't relevant because they don't agree with you! If you're tempted to become a lawyer or something, don't, you won't make any money.

HAHAHAHA No comment! Obviously the sentence I said stopped at the word 'need' and nothing else was said! Your understanding of the English language astounds me! EVEN BETTER THAN OXFORD!

Just stop trying dude, he wont listen, he can't even realise his own implications.

Are you really going to argue with the Oxford dictionary?

I said in my first reply to you, "I think about 80% of people who claim to be religious, aren't". But you said it wasn't relevant Urm, about you being open minded, well you brought it up, not me? Why complain to yourself? I guess it follows the same as you telling people what their beliefs are. Lol.

Nope. 'that was happening' as I'm talking about a past continuous event that STOPPED after the introduction of religion, a fact that happened in reality. I did not imply anything beyond that fact. Otherwise I would have said: "if it wasn't for religion, we'd still have slaves today!" You see?

Jimmy, I don't often say this to people, but, get out of the cave, please, for your own good! You claimed to be an open minded person but over the last 10 pages I haven't seen any evidence of this, only the contrary.

reason • noun 1 a cause, explanation, or justification I GIVE UP.

Yes I did, because believe it or not, we DID, _at the time_. You then took this out of context and started whining about slavery never ending without religion which I then replied to. The word 'Did' is used in the past tense in my statement.