D G - DON

No i just object to a childs dignity not being respected. I am as NORMAL as you and the next guy and quite frankly i feel it unnecessary for you to give me such a hard time, I am asking for support. that’s all.. if you don’t wanna give it forget it thats fine. i guess i made a rod for my own back by heading to a forum but then we all learn from our mistakes. One thing is for sure you aint a friendly bunch of peeps. But i guess your bullying tactics are what make you so strong.

again ?? all other statements are factuall this i was unsure of and cant confirm as i am not that clued up on laws and have the net as a guideline but for peace and respect i have removed it. but no that wouldnt be good enough for you

Whilst it is safe to assume that those looking at the highest level of abusive images pose a serious risk, it is never safe to assume that someone who has mainly images in the lower levels is of little risk to children. Pictures of children may be used by abusers as the basis of sexual fantasies. Without thorough and effective assessment this cannot be gauged. The issue concerning why someone would have a large collection of images of children who are not family members, or even known to the collector, must be addressed. THATS A QUOTE

Level 1 Name Description of Picture Qualities 1 Indicative Non-erotic and non-sexualised pictures showing children in their underwear, swimming costumes, etc from either commercial sources or family albums; pictures of children playing in normal settings, in which the context or organisation of pictures by the collector indicates inappropriateness 2 Nudist Pictures of semi-naked children in appropriate nudist settings and from legitimate sources. 3 Erotica Surreptitiously taken photographs of children in play areas or other safe environments showing either underwear or varying degrees of nakedness 4 Posing Deliberately posed pictures of children fully, partially clothed or naked (where the amount, context and organisation suggests sexual interest). 5 Erotic Posing Deliberately posed pictures of fully, partially clothed or naked children in sexualised or provocative poses 6 Explicit Erotic Posing Emphasising genital areas where the child is either naked, partially or fully clothed. 7 Explicit Sexual Activity Involves touching, mutual and self-masturbation, oral sex and intercourse by child, not involving an adult. 8 Assault Picture of children being subject to a sexual assault, involving digital touching, involving an adult 9 Gross Assault Grossly obscene pictures of sexual assault, involving penetrative sex, masturbation or oral sex involving an adult 10 Sadistic/Bestiality Picture showing a child being tied, bound, beaten, whipped or otherwise subject to something that implies pain. Pictures where an animal is involved in some form of sexual behaviour with a child. There the facts of the law i didnt make them,, nor do i agree you cant take pics in a pool. What i will say to you tho. is you as i have a right to our opinion that right DOESNT stretch as far as allowing you to through nasty personal remarks i have no issues with my sex and sexuality i am a happy married man with 2 children i will stand by my campaign as i know its wrong to disregard a childs dignity. So there 5 ,7 , 9 and ??? they have the same rights as us and that is a FACT..

You are not allowed to take pictures at public swimming baths call your local tommorow and you will see 4 urself.

That is a legal statement .. I beleive it to be correct as you are not allowed to take pictures of children in swimming baths etc.. but i have removed it as i agree it gave the wrong impresssion of my intentions thats already a law i am not getting involved in

That is a fact, and a different debate completly. I have different views on this. My concern is a child being asked to take part in P.E in their underwear . How is that so hard to understand?

Am i right in seeing that someone is standing up and talking my language. Do you know just today alone i have spoken with 10 people unknown to me and all say they are aware of it but have let it carry on ... why ??? a child has the right to their dignity as does a 90 yr old woman. Thanks Yorkie !

Up and down the country ..

Appearances are deceptive as I have been a Sheffield forum member for many years as DG.DON I have actually provided JOBS for some members. I don’t feel the need to debate this issue as I know my intentions are good and i also know that many others feel the same and when I have filtered the users that will moan for the sake of moaning i am sure i will come across people that have a comprehension of what it means to protect out Childs dignity. I don’t give a damn weather its legal or not all i can say is its not Moral. Please do share the holes as not everyone is perfect I am sure there are some but there are serious concerns there that need to be addressed.

Yes there are a number of schools within the south yorkshire area operating like this it may be the school it may be the teachers preference all i am wanting is this to be highlighted as i have heard many moan yet very few stand up and do whats right. I have raised concerns but until the governement steps in there is little i can do but get support.

And each and everyone should be tackled head on but can only be done with support of others. This issue may be considered minor by some but all minors make up a major ..

Give me an example please... something that will help these children? and thanks

Please read the site - Dignity is the key issue that is being abused.

Thankfully yours do but there are many that expect that dont , please support the cause and help us make every school opperate like your sons.