downtroad

If the bible has no reference to something, is it ok for me to do it?

It was oral sex so it was perfectly legal.

I once had oral sex with an eel.

That depends which branch of Christianity you are talking about. 10 Commandments are old testament.

Once every 6 years i have my back waxed.

They told me they were here for the mushrooms. Nice bunch really. Very plesent. They even gave me a lift home, the next thing i know i am tucked up in bed with a nice cup of cocoa and the bike was in the shed. Should i be worried about the USA being after me?

After a particularly nice day at Snake Pass Inn, I was riding home on me bike and just after I went through Ashopton I saw a strange light, it was glowing green. I though it was a rave or something so I went to investigate. As I got closer I could see an egg shaped object, thicker at one end. It was undulating green light. There were no windows. I really cannot go any further with the story as I am sure I will be ridiculed. Suffice to say I am a believer I have seen them with my own eyes.

Ahh so once again it's the sane people who do not stand up against the BNP that are to blame? For not posting more? But you said in a post on the first page people are being pushed towards the BNP by posting PC brigade stuff? You personally have banned (and removed posts) people reminding users what Roys lady said on this forum. She said it here Joe, and if she didn't mean it why say it in the public domain? I am not talking about censorship joe, in a way i am (see last paragraph) i am talking about realizing you (SF) are a tool and keeping the playing field level. Some people against racism have felt they have been pushed away by SF, is that fair and balanced? WHen the BNP members clearly do not feel like they should leave? I would like to remind you, that you are but one mod and you do not speak for all.

Also people threatening me with legal action should just do it. I have been threatened by people in the BNP and outside, with all sorts of things, but non have gone through with it. Bullies are like that. I have given SF the right (and continue to) to give out my details to the lawyers of people making these threats and that offer still stands to anybody feeling i have misrepresented them. It always comes from people wanting to silence debate and they are always empty threats.

But we are being told this issue does not exist, it must me in our minds? I agree do not ban people reminding others of post in threads made by members, when its valid to the debate. I do not beleive its inherant to SF, as you said SF is being used as a tool of extreamists.

You are getting many things right Joe, please do not see this as a blanket critisism. It's not. You have a hard job and get many things right even in my mind. I just do not think these threads are representative of Sheffield or England. Polling for the BNP shows that in my mind, if we had an updated figure more correct than the 2%. It's not about what i feel is disagreeable. It's about being representative and fair. SF is private so it has no reason to be fair, but i would expect it would like to be representaive. You must know you have a much more vocal BNP segment than is usuall for a forum like this?

Not just new ones either, old ones, many wo are not here anymore due to a percieved (on their part) bias towards BNP rhetoric. If you look at some of the big BNP threads you will see people taking part that are no longer around, some because they got banned so many times, some because they felt it not worth while. I think that when you have a persistant BNP presence and people leaving the anti-BNP debate left right and center maybe this should be looked at by the forum owner in a objective and transparent way.

I am glad you say its offensive to be accused of being a BNP supporter. And i wasn't really saying that, i was just saying that usually you support the BNP line of racial/immigration or blood in the streets questioning. As to if you are a supporter, i would not know. I only see what you write on this forum. Once again to prove defamation you would have to show i actually did your good name harm. So please drop the legal terms.

WOW you read a whole lot in to very little. I just said i would expect you to be outraged, why is that defaming? (another legal term.. how many mre threats will i get in this thread?) You generally are supportive of the threads i am talking about.

Once again i didn't say you were a member supporter etc, i said you were more friendly than other mods. If i had accused you of more than that i would appologies, i did not, so i will not. And the only reason i question is because i see a whole lot of threads on a daily basis for the BNP and many active BNP members here and being told its only 2% of threads.. in all forums including forums the BNP could not post in. Why do you think they are here? Can you show me another forum where ther are spending so much time? I have looked and cannot seem to find one. I really am not attacking you personally, i think mods should be from across the spectrum. And do not beleive you are an apologist. But i do think that when many people have rasied issues, it would be just the smartest thing to do, to let somebody compile that stats that is more detached from these debates. No more, no less. But your reaction?