Jump to content

Caswall

Members
  • Content Count

    146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7 Neutral

About Caswall

  • Rank
    Registered User

Personal Information

  • Location
    A Sheffield post code.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Not to target the driver of a car recognised in that way would be more ludicrous. We have about 40 million cars in the UK, with 7 million or so used cars sold annually - about 18% of all cars change hands annually. So daily, about 0.06 percent. Which means there's a 99.94% chance that that car hasn't changed hands since the day before. Imagine the briefing "Ok lads, we've found the car that was involved in yesterday's shooting, there's a 99.94% chance the same low-end violent scumbag is driving it, but when you stop it make sure you assume the driver is totally safe and unarmed". That would be asinine.
  2. Who has suggested that anybody be allowed to act 'above the law'? The law tells us that we should comply with Police, and the law tells us that a Police officer - or member of the public - has the right to self-defence or the defence of others. I think we can safely infer that shooting a scrote who is not complying to Police instructions, and who the Police at the time reasonably believe poses a serious threat to them or those around them, is very much complying with the law, not being above it.
  3. In fairness, she can sometimes reveal a sinister edge. I dare not refuse one of her lemon cakes - the consequences may be dire.
  4. So if stolen, he was indeed a scrote himself, and if loaned to him by a 'friend', clearly he has friends in very low places. Can you envisage yourself behind the wheel of a car recently used in a shooting incident? I'm sure if I borrowed Aunt Mabel's car tomorrow there would be little such risk.
  5. In today's political arena, Labour seems more to protect the non-working man. The tax payers among us are much better served by a Conservative government.
  6. Indeed - a nauseating movement at the time. I don't personally know any people who are anti-Police, or Police-haters, but I cannot conceive of any reason that a decent law-abiding member of society would heva eeny feelings other than respect or admratio for those who protect us.ie, or Polcie haters,
  7. Indeed - a nauseating movement at the time. I don't personally know any people who are anti-Police, or Police-haters, but I cannot conceive of any reason that a decent law-abiding member of society would have any feelings other than respect or admratio for those who protect us.
  8. I'm sure we'll see and hear all the sob-stories from his family and friends about 'what a lovely boy he was', but if Mr Kaba had been compliant with Police at the time, no doubt he would be alive today. Let us also not forget he was behind the wheel of a car associated with a recent shooting incident. So, while we do not know (at the moment) whether or not he was an utter scrote himself, we can have little doubt that he was an associate of such people. Our thoughts should be with the Police officer who is now being subjected to an ordeal for doing his job.
  9. Most of the country is looking forward to a thoroughly enjoyable weekend of national pride, reflection, and a little good old-fashioned jingoism. Of course, the lefty anti-royals won’t like that, but we should hardly blame a national institution like the monarchy for the bad life decisions others make which leave them needing food banks. (On that point, isn’t it funny that most of the ‘poor’ who attend food banks seem to be covered in a resplendent - and doubtless costly - range of tattoos and seem all to have the obligatory fag-in-gob (the cost of which a decent human being would instead have spent on food)).
  10. It's good to introduce kids to weapons in a controlled, formal environment so they can become safety-aware. Safe sporting use of firearms should not be confused/associated with wastrels of the criminal underclass killing each other over drugs.
  11. Exactly. Naive well-meaning aid organisations and charities do everything they can to 'save the poor starving folk', not realising that they are starving because they have out-bred the resources available in their environment. Nature has to redress he balance - which means bringing back the population to a level sustainable (within the meagre offerings available in the Horn of Africa. The same misguided 'do-gooders' who want to save every 'poor starving baby' in the third world are usually the ones beating a different drum about conserving the environment and protecting the world against CO2 emissions - such profound hypocrisy when the only real way to protect the future of the world is to prevent population expansion - which means letting nature do its right and required job in Africa.
  12. Dear Lord how can even these deluded, cerebrally-limited folk actually believe in such conspiracy nonsense?
  13. I rather liked the one that involved Chalkey being towed on his bicycle behind an E-Type.
  14. Perhaps because they have the benefit of life experience and recognise the silliness of this nauseating current fad for political correctness.
  15. Which candidates have cited that as a reason for withdrawing? If employers are paying as much as, or more than, the minimum wage set by a democratically elected government (and which has increased more than 50% in the last 10 years), how are they doing anything wrong?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.