Jump to content

onewheeldave

Members
  • Content Count

    5,918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by onewheeldave

  1. Presumably you mean 'Why would they want to do that?'
  2. Because parents who wish to immunise their children against measles, but don't want them having the triple vaccine jab, could go ahead and get them the measles jab.
  3. I expect that vaccine uptake would be higher if the single measles jab were available on the NHS.
  4. Do you have access to the actual official reasoning behind this company policy? If so, what is it?
  5. Yes- because you've just posted this on a public forum
  6. Though at many times of the day your chances of getting a taxi to turn up is far from adequate.
  7. None of the drugs obtainable legally in the UK are suitable for reliable euthanasia- in overdose they tend to leave you alive while destroying liver or kidney function. Barbiturates are viable, but, made illegal, in large part because so many people used them successfully for suicide.
  8. Here's a list with around 25 foodbanks for Sheffield- http://www.sheffieldfoodbank.org.uk/food-bank-list/
  9. TBH I'm more bothered by the smell of those who reek of chemicals and perfume.
  10. Would be interesting to compare the profit made from vaccines to that made from ivermectin. The companies mentioned will certainly have done so and that information would be key in any decisions they make.
  11. They look very respectable https://www.azonetwork.com/
  12. Prior to covid I would also have thought that right/left wing shouldn't have made much difference when it came to a pandemic and the associated compliance decisions. It perplexed me greatly why, whenever I found a source of info that seemed sane to me, that it was inevitably a source that was either right wing, or labelled as such. I honestly can't think of a single left wing source that challenged the measures, objected to the lockdowns- in fact the majority of left wing sources only called out for yet more measures, more restrictions, more censorship, etc. In hindsight, I can now see why the left are like that- watching the increasing woke hysteria with all the attendant demands for restrictions, and, especially censorship, also makes things a bit clearer. It was about compliance, and, any caring, was for a select group of the population, and damn the rest to hell. That is not 'caring'. Children died of cancer unable to see their parents. Buisnesses and lives ruined. As predicted by some, the NHS now further crippled by the fall out of the lockdowns in terms of horrific waiting lists..... and plenty more which I'll not mention as I don't want to take this thread off topic.
  13. and ......'the methodological quality of Cochrane reviews is good compared to the non-Cochrane reviews ' i.e. they're better than the rest.
  14. Most do though. So they conclude that Cochrane reviews are better than non-Cochrane reviews, but they're not 'gold standard'?
  15. I used to be quite averse to right wingers. But watching GB news during the insanity of the global covid over reaction did wonders for my mental health- was very good to be aware that there were people out there who could see that what the authorities were doing was not right. Disturbingly, all the left wingers seemed to offer was total compliance. Personally I don't much care about left wing vs right wing- there are clearly highly intelligent and moral people on both sides [and vice versa]. Prior to covid I never would have supported a Tory govt, but, I sure am glad left wingers weren't in charge during covid.
  16. Remember, I posted that extract in response to another poster claiming that Cochrane, the gold standard for scientific evidence appraisal, are saying that there is no quality evidence that masks reduce infection. This is important because the authorities pushed masks [and punished those who didn't comply] supposedly because there was evidence of efficacy: there was not [quality] evidence. They pushed other things [and punished non compliers] without quality evidence. They will not doubt do the same in future epidemics and emergencies. It is important that more of the public are aware of this.
  17. to anyone who says anything like the above, the Cochrane study disagrees- "The pooled results of RCTs did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks." https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full
  18. Cochrane, having reviewed the relevant high quality studies, disagrees- https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full
  19. link to the actual study- https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses'
  20. Here's a link to a letter sent to the FDA by Joseph A. Ladapo who is Surgeon General of Florida, concerning the high rates of adverse events following administration of Covid mrna vaccines compared to those following administration of traditional [non mrna] vaccines- https://www.floridahealth.gov/_documents/newsroom/press-releases/2023/02/20230215-updated-health-alert-letter.pdf?utm_source=floridahealth.gov&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=newsroom&utm_content=article&url_trace_7f2r5y6=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.floridahealth.gov%2Fnewsroom%2F2023%2F02%2F20230215-updated-health-alert.pr.html 'In addition to Florida's analysis of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, academic researchers throughout our country and around the globe have seen troubling safety signals of adverse events surrounding this vaccine. Their concerns are corroborated by the substantial increase in VAERS reports from Florida, including life-threatening conditions. We have never seen this type of response following previous mass vaccination efforts pushed by the federal government. Even the HI NI vaccine did not trigger this sort of response. In Florida alone, we saw a 1,700% increase in reports after the release of the COVID-I9 vaccine, compared to an increase of 400% in vaccine administration for the same period. The reporting of lifethreatening conditions increased 4,400%. This increase in adverse events, compared to the percent increase in vaccine use, further explains the significant uptick we are seeing in VAERS reports. These findings are unlikely to be related to changes in reporting given their magnitude, and more likely reflect a pattern of increased risk from mRNA COVlD-19 vaccines. We need unbiased research, as many in the Florida Department of Health Office of the State Surgeon General Accredited Health Department 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A-00 Tallahassee, FL 323991701 : Public Health Accreditation Board PHONE: 850/245-4210 ¯ FAX: 850/922-9453 FlorldaHealth.gov academic community have performed, to better understand these vaccines' short- and longterm effects. According to a recent study, mRNA COVID-1 9 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events, including coagulation disorders, acute cardiac injuries, Bell's palsy, and encephalitis, to name a few. This risk was I in 550, much higher than other vaccines. To claim these vaccines are "safe and effective" while minimizing and disregarding the adverse events is unconscionable.'
  21. Just to be clear- I wasn't advising to switch to Uber- City has issues.... Uber has different issues. I like to support City because if they go under, Uber has the monopoly and their prices will rise accordingly. What I was suggesting was to have both apps, so if a City driver doesn't pick up your job you can book an Uber i.e. it's a back up.
  22. I do- the solution is for these companies to stop making people jump through pointless hoops and provide a print option
  23. Doesn't seem 'fair' to me to make a person spend a significant part of their day traveling into town, messing around with parking/public transport, queueing etc, when the provision of a print option would enable them to have the printout in a matter of seconds.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.