Magilla

Your version of insults is when someone just highlighted your opinions fall to pieces under the most basic scrutiny or any notion of fact.... and your 3 page, completely irrelevant waffle, trying to cover that up... hasn't worked. "You got it wrong" and "you have no idea what you're talking about"... aren't insults... just statements of fact. 🙄 A succinct and accurate appraisal. Loves dishing it out, can't take it.

In translation: The public voted for someone else to do the Bush Tucker Trial... so it's not going to be all about Nigel 🙄

Immigration was also was lower than now. It's almost like you forgot those rights and privileges apply to you too. 🙄 Absolutely, the associated rights and privileges that bestows, before you even get to the economic advantages... ...who, in their right mind, wouldn't?

Bad news from UK SME's... Brexit and Businesses: In their own words: https://assets.nationbuilder.com/euromove/pages/14236/attachments/original/1700125178/Brexit_Business_Impact_Report.pdf A striking 93.6% of respondents said that Brexit had affected them negatively, and only 3.2% felt positive about our break with the EU. Over half of respondents (53.8%) told us that the volume and complexity of documentation now needed to trade with clients and suppliers in Europe made running their business harder. 95.5% of respondents told us they would benefit from regaining our former access to the EU Single Market and 92% said the same for the Customs Union. More than 70% of respondents said that Brexit had affected their business very negatively, and more than 20% had been somewhat negatively affected. Only 3.4% have felt any benefit from Brexit.

When Brexit is stripped out from the impact of other shocks, primarily those of Covid and the war in Ukraine: https://www.niesr.ac.uk/publications/revisiting-effect-brexit?type=global-economic-outlook-topical-feature "Our estimates indicate that the negative impact of Brexit gradually escalates, reaching some 5-6 per cent of GDP or about £2,300 per capita by 2035. The reduction in real incomes resulting from the fall in the UK terms of trade associated with changes in trading relations with the European Union and the fall in productivity are the largest contributors to the estimated reduction in real GDP, with each accounting for over 2.5 percentage points."

Aye, a lose/lose one... Brexit in a nutshell.

Brexit brings with it a new kind of uncertainty https://www.ft.com/content/f097516f-3fab-40be-a883-4654332e2e59 Brexit is unusual in that it generated persistent uncertainty. We do know from a large body of analytical evidence that a key driver of business investment decisions is certainty . . . you want certainty around where fiscal policy is going, and certainty about what kind of relationships your economy is going to have. Even if the UK gets a stable government (one that doesn’t flip-flop on net zero or repeatedly threaten to legislate in defiance of its international treaty obligations) Brexit creates a permanent state of low-grade uncertainty. This is because every time its largest trade partner advances new rules and regulations, the UK (and its investors who have links with integrated supply chains and data sharing) are going to have to ask themselves how the UK will, or won’t, respond to those rules. Commit to alignment of EU rules that we have no say in... or continue haemorrhaging trade and investment... a difficult choice 🙄

That's what you call someone who believes something despite reality being the polar opposite of their claims... it suits you to a tee. That you lack the self awareness to have noticed... again, priceless. 🤣

Given the woefully uninformed, fact free crap you post, what else would you call it? 🙄 Just another way for you to scurry off with your tail between your legs though, I supposed 🤣

That's you Al, a fully indoctrinated BS'r As before, even the human excrement that is Andrew Tate says you're talking out of your a-hole in this thread! Now that is hillarious 🤣

And right on cue, it begins! 🤣 The desperation is palpable! 🤣 Ho humm, lets talk about anything but the people I spend all my life making excuses for... check! The connection with Wilders, of course... who has lots of form for inspiring this sort of stuff... completely beyond you, obvs. Just the usual pathetic whataboutery. Imagine my complete surprise! I look forward to the pic of some chippy owner who happens to have a "Free Palestine" poster in the window, as the true cause of the incident.... if last time was anything to go by! 🤣

Splitting sides from laughing can indeed be painful! 🤣 You've got to laugh... there's some irony in seeing the radicalised wanna-be's having their right wing poster boy highlight just why they're talking out of their arses in this thread!

In this case, the marginalisation/complete abandonment of Palestine that is enshrined in the Abraham Accords. Turns out, pretending they don't exist and deserve no consideration... is not a viable way forward for a peace process.

Given he spent the entire week denying the "Suella's Army" incident happened at all (even after she was explicitly sacked because of it), with a load of desperate whataboutery and false equivalence in excuse... was interested to see how ludicrous the levels of desperation really can get... ...and, obviously, looking forward to similar pics of a couple of random people with questionable banners hanging around, as proof of equivalence with the over 100 arrests for violent attacks on the police.

Does it have to be? "Suella's Army" refers to those that turned up and caused the vast majority of violence on Armistice Day, as a result of her mischaracterisation of those that were organising protest, and total misinformation about the protest itself. i.e The people who ultimately caused the vast majority of violence on the day. The similarities between her misplaced rhetoric and what happened then, and the similar "speculation" and what happened here... are somewhat obvious. 🙄

As someone who spends his entire life scouring the Guardian in a rage, imagine my complete surprise that he completely missed this front page article today: Irish police chief warns of further disruption by far right after Dublin riot: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/24/dublin-rioters-could-face-jail-helen-mcentee-justice-minister-says speculation about the suspect’s nationality spread online, anti-immigrant activists flocked to the city centre Given the staunch defence and of Suella's Army on Armistice Day, am looking forward to the ludicrous whataboutery and false equivalence that surely must be coming 🤣

Well it's nice to see you construct a response that so resolutely debunks Tate's, or my, claims. 🙄 🤣

Just accept the result for what it really is, not what you mistakenly think it is. Let's see if Labour "win", with a 25% vote share first eh! 🤣 How to not make a complete tit of yourself, by repeatedly highlighting you're clueless? 🤣

Yes, you've got nowt... who knew! 🤣

Even the human excrement that is Andrew Tate, knows you and Jack are full of it. 🤣

The result does not mean Wilders will automatically gain power as his vote share is way too small. Given your critique of the Guardian article, clearly, it's you who is really failing accept the result. 🙄 Your cries of "democracy" in relation... only highlight you really have no idea what democracy is, or how it works. Priceless! 🤣

The only person stamping their feet here, was you! Like a typical far righty... throwing the toys out of the pram because they have no idea of reality, or how anything actually works. 🤣 Whining about "democracy", over a 25% vote share... you couldn't make it up! How daft do you have to be!

Well nothing says that like a right wing trope! You literally became the thing you're moaning about... in the next sentence! 🤣

When 75% of people voted for the "other guy", and taking your comments into account... ...it's clear, it's not just the far right who are a threat to democracy.... there's the mentally challenged too! 🤣

His party won the largest share, 25%... it is not enough to form a government.