Broakham

Regulations around the use of drones are the responsibility of the government, not the installation and deployment of security measures at a commercial establishment.

Check if your phone has NFC switched on. If so, switch if off.

It's quite possible Gaz. Most of Revills rounds were on the Brushes estate so I also did The Oval, Horninglow, Stubbin etc. The Page Hall round, (Firth Park Rd, Firth Park Ave, Hinde House Lane, Wensley estate and then down to Page Hall terraces) was a bit of an oddity, but was probably because Revills lived down there. It was a long drag but we got 2d to catch the bus back. I can't actually remember crossing paths with any other paperboys, but I used to bump into a papergirl whose round came down Windmill and onto Hinde House. We used to pop into the allotments to errrr... get to know each other.

Maypole at Firth Park also.

I used to deliver papers in the early/mid 60s for Revills at Firth Park. The Wensley Estate was on one of their rounds.

Randstad ?

Castle Market was built by the Socialist Republic of South Yorkshire not by Thatcher.

If you were really concerned about Sheffields heritage you would be complaining that the markets were moved from their traditional area of Market Place, where they had been for circa 700 years, and moved into a concrete monstrosity built on top of true heritage. I suspect that your idea of heritage has the same span as your lifetime.

If you had true Jedi mind powers you would be able to wear your Jedi robe and make people think you were wearing conventional clothes.

I would have Carlos back, with strict conditions :- 1. Someone hammers home to him the importance of fitness and conditioning. 2. The fitness/medical team have the final say on when an injured player is fit to return. 3. He has more confidence in his academy players instead of wasting money panic buying 3rd rate players.

We've had a recent thread on the merits of David Hockney paintings, so in the interest of balance, here is some proper art. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-46447199

According to the BBC local news website there must have been 3 crashes. One on Staniforth Rd, one on Stainforth Rd and one on Satinforth Rd.

Why don't you volunteer as a Special Constable, then you might realise that you are posting vacuous drivel.

According to The Star, season ticket holders are counted whether they are there or not.

The problem might well be the so-called "expert' help he is already getting. So called advisors who are only interested in making money for themselves.

Don't let the 'S' postcode lead you astray. I would think that most Sheffielders would consider Creswell to be more 'aligned' to Chesterfield or Worksop. You may get more responses and information from forums dedicated to those two towns. I can't find a general forum for Worksop, but you could try:- http://www.chesterfieldonline.org/

Check out MagPi magazine;- https://www.raspberrypi.org/magpi/issues/ All their publications are available as free PDF downloads.

There are thousands of experts here:- https://www.rootschat.com/ It is a very helpful and friendly forum (no bickering as on here). There are experts on all family history matters.

You are still implying that I must have an ulterior motive for not posting a comment about Operation Stovewood. You clearly have something on your mind so why don't you give up on the innuendo and tell us what it is?

I am well aware of Operation Stovewood. However, I fail to see why you think I should give an opinion of it before I am allowed to post about another conviction where I was curious about the apparent lenience of the sentence. Are you trying to suggest that there is a hidden agenda to my post? If so, just get on with it and ask me.

Of course I'm not suggesting that Hockney is a fraud, I'm sure he paints what he does because he enjoys it. It is the hype from others that draws in those with more money than common sense. Here is a fine example of gushing drivel for you:- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-46215476

I'm still unclear about what your problem is. Can you clarify? ---------- Post added 16-11-2018 at 22:55 ---------- If you read my post properly you will see that the current high profile case was referenced in a quote. To mention that one without mentioning others is pure deflection of the issue.

The thread is about child abuse convictions, why would it not be relevant?

And here's another one with a much more lenient sentence. I wonder why. https://www.southyorks.police.uk/find-out/news/2018/november-2018/man-sentenced-for-child-sexual-offences/

Some pearls are real and some pearls are artificial, intended to fool the gullible. ---------- Post added 16-11-2018 at 20:22 ---------- Give it to charity ?