WiseOwl182

Agreed. Men shouldn't be allowed to abort their 8 month old babies either.

He's a troll.

I think in this case though, the outrage is about the hypocrisy and double standards of those usual suspects who express the faux outrage, suddenly being accepting of a 'joke' about throwing acid on people.

Do you agree or disagree with the scenario in the OP? Should a woman be able to choose to abort a healthy baby at near enough full term?

Very desperate. Desperate to avoid answering any question. A woman carries a baby for 8 months and 30 days and then decides she doesn't want it any more. Should she be able to abort it? Yes or no will suffice.

If they choose to have the baby and not abort it at full term, that implies there could be a choice to abort it. Should there be a choice at that stage? There isn't currently. Do you want the law changed so that women have that choice?

Why? Are you saying there are no bad women in the world? Some women have been convicted for murdering their own children. Some women may make bad decisions due to mental health issues or drug problems. Are you saying it's impossible that any woman would ever abort a baby at near full term? Which doesn't exist. You said this at post #145. Why not answer the question instead of referring to non-existent posts? A woman carries a baby for 8 months and 30 days and then decides she doesn't want it any more. Should she be able to abort it? Yes or no will suffice.

I don't know your views. Why don't you answer the question? A woman carries a baby for 8 months and 30 days and then decides she doesn't want it any more. Should she be able to abort it? Yes or no will suffice.

I think you're dodging the question again as usual. A woman carries a baby for 8 months and 30 days and then decides she doesn't want it any more. Should she be able to abort it? Yes or no will suffice.

It's possible. Why wouldn't it be? The discussion isn't about what women would do, it's about what they legally or morally should be able to do.

Too little, too late.

Here's one possible nuance: a woman carries a baby for 8 months and 30 days and then decides she doesn't want it any more. Should she be able to abort it? Yes or no will suffice.

Because it's illegal. Should it be an option for them?

The BBC should be distancing themselves from Brand and not employing her services again. Instead they're defending her comedy. Hypocrisy.

Because it's illegal. Should it be an option for them?

It's not about whether or not you think it will happen. It's also not about having c sections. It's about whether or not a woman should be able to have their 8 month and 30 day old unborn baby killed. You admitted you think they should.

The same BBC who, only weeks earlier, sacked someone else for posting a picture of a monkey in a suit. The take home lesson is that the BBC demonstrates hypocrisy of the highest order.

So you have confirmed that you believe a woman should have the right to choose to abort a baby at almost 9 months. Now, explain the difference between "aborting" the baby the day before it's birthdate, and murdering it the day after? Why do you think the former should be the woman's choice, but (presumably) the latter illegal by the state? What has changed so drastically in a day?

That's not the question. Stop deflecting. Should they be able to?

The BBC would've sacked him for that, if they employed him.

Should they be able to use it?

It's not my scenario, it's the OP's. I've made my thoughts about it quite clear. How about you do the same and answer the question? Should a woman be allowed to choose (ie. not for medical reasons) to abort the baby days before its due date?

Should a woman be allowed to choose (ie. not for medical reasons) to abort the baby days before its due date?

Should a woman be allowed to choose (ie. not for medical reasons) to abort the baby days before its due date?

Yes, it is. The BBC is politically biased to left leaning political agenda. Its double standards are a reflection of this.