TheWriter

Bet Fred have a coupon for the score in 30 mins... dunno about the other, I assume it Bet Fred though...

try the three or more goals and the score within 30 mins... i think is what's said.. I'm going to try one of them today lol

I have to say that in my opinion the vast majority of Muslims do support these acts. But they won't openly admit it. This is because they don't see it as outright terrorism. They see it as freedom fighting, which is fair enough. How many condemn any wrong doing by Palistinians? There's plenty of history over there so there will be atrocities from both sides. ---------- Post added 28-09-2013 at 08:51 ---------- I feel that some of the extreme left also sympathise with the terrorists. ---------- Post added 28-09-2013 at 08:54 ---------- The Tories called Nelson Mandella a terrorist, but he was a freedom fighter... well to anyone with half a brain....

Does it seem such a good bet? Had some extremely close shaves for good money £1200 last week. Had 12 matches, 24 teams and got 22 up. Had a few hundreds over last few months... For those that don't know its a Bet Fred bet where both teams have to score... Are you a Goal Galourer?... It can become an addiction...

I was thinking about this point the other day. I appreciate how Muslims stick together to help each other. We could learn from this in the West. So if there was a major war, say the balance of power changed and a Muslim nation became a dominant force and was marching this way. Would the Muslims who live here fight for England? Say if I lived in Pakistan and they were the dominant nation, but things changed and England was on the march, at the borders of Pakistan, who would I fight for? If I'm honest, I don't know. If I had a Pakistani family, then I'd probably fight for them, but if not and I hadn't been there long, probably England. I'd be interested to hear what Muslims think about this. There's no shame in wanting to defend your own, bloods thicker than water.

I think anyone who commits a heinous crime and uses the religion in some way should be refused to all religious privileges when found guilty. This could be Catholic Priests of Muslim Terrorists, or even some nutty anti abortion Christian. All reading material, prayer time, diets and visits by religious people like Imans etc should be banned. Anyone who dies while in the process of the crime should also have no religion in their funeral ceremony. I'm sure, because the people have used the religion to bring shame on the decent worshippers, this will have the backing of all the religious groups. ---------- Post added 27-09-2013 at 14:10 ---------- I think they may say they don't recognise the court.

I'm sure you support more convictions for sexual assault by ensuring more men are found guilty? even though some of these will be innocent. They must have felt he was a threat. They didn't just randomly pick a dark skinned individual and plan to kill him. Its silly to make a race issue out of it, it was just bad intelligence and stressed police officers making a wrong judgement call. In many ways there's a paradox here. In that some are usuing the issue, in effect using the victim, to score silly political points. That's you that is.

Erm, behind the fridge is looking a little scruffy. Less interwebing and more cleaning please..

Because the victims are the same religion as the terrorists doesn't make it any less vile. Its like saying we don't have sympathy for Catholic children because of what priests did. ---------- Post added 27-09-2013 at 13:46 ---------- Not the people. The religion is sub human though. Just read the book. ---------- Post added 27-09-2013 at 14:00 ---------- Another one.... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24296748

When I was watching his speech yesterday I kept getting the though, we can't have him as Prime Minister, the blokes an idiot.

Well for the first question. Yes. Its not just about searching young black men, its about searching those most likely to have a gun. This is young black men. In relation to the second point. He wasn't killed because he was a Brazillian but because there was a serious threat of terrorism, he was killed because they thought he was a terrorist. Terrorism was being comited by people with the same physical appearance as him ie none white, Muslim, Pakistani coloured. They got it very wrong and killed an innocent man. If he was a terrorist and they didn't act, they'd have been accused of being useless. Its a very difficult job. Its easy to be critical when you/I probably wouldn't last two minutes. ---------- Post added 25-09-2013 at 05:36 ---------- Black culture gloryfies gun crime. Its easy money. Guns are a status symbol with some young black men. More so than with other racial groups. No doubt the bleeding heart liberals will portray them as the victims though. ---------- Post added 25-09-2013 at 05:38 ---------- Because they are more likely to strive for success in employment / education.

The question now is when will all this end, and how? When will we reach the tipping point? News is that there's a British born person involved in the attack. Why is this? Islam has poluted her. That's what it does. For those who always offer the same platitudes of being sorry... How many more before you realise that your denial is helping kill more and more people, because it hinders any sort of tough action.

The stop and search practices are legitimate when gun crime is on the increase.

So it appears the rioters excuse for starting, ie the shooting of an innocent man, Mark Duggan, was a load of old rubbish... Mark Duggan was one of the most violent gangsters in the country and was linked to ten shootings and two murders, an inquest was told yesterday. The 29-year-old, whose death after being shot by a police marksman sparked the 2011 summer riots, opened fire in a nightclub in Christmas 2010, it was claimed. He was also a senior member of the notorious Tottenham ManDem (TMD) gang and was implicated in other firearms offences leading up to his death, it was alleged. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2430081/Mark-Duggan-Britains-violent-gangsters-Inquest-hears-linked-shootings.html#ixzz2fndS3oOZ Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Wouldn't it be better to tackle the issue though, before it arrives. It'll be a lot easier to introduce rules before someone with a grudge or point to make decides to wear one. I'd ban it for people driving as well. The strategy is wrong by those against the veil IMO. They should refuse to deal with anyone wearing one and ask for someone who isn't.