Jump to content

alchemist

Members
  • Content Count

    4,425
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About alchemist

  • Rank
    A typical Tyke
  • Birthday 18/02/1957

Personal Information

  • Location
    Gods Own County
  • Interests
    games, being free taxi to kids
  • Occupation
    IT support

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Shes american so therefore doesnt understand the difference between telling the truth and lying
  2. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14425980/meghan-markle-prince-harry-admit-did-not-marry-three-days-before-wedding/ Oh look, it turns out she LIED. What a surprise. What else were porkies?
  3. Anything to keep her in the public eye for the chatshow and "celebrity" reality show market. Im a celeb in December?? It HAS to be public to make the most money in guest appearances
  4. Oh yes, definitely. She has already got a string of BAME supporters and activists coming out in support saying shes the best thing since sliced bread. We dont know the context or the other side, or indeed, if its actually true at all Lets be right here, its to keep HER in the spotlight and ready to star in some inferior series and tout the talkshow circuit
  5. She was hoping that she could use the status given to her a royal to help promote her causes and when she found out that she couldnt she threw her toys out of the pram. Harry, being still in the first flushes of love/lust allowed her to do so without realising the consequences. Once these became obvious and that they were willing to call his bluff he found he had gone too far to back down and he was stuffed
  6. Couple who say they dont want media attention go to the media for attention No, I wont be watching it Personally I cant see the marriage lasting that long, shes too far up her own arse to avoid publicity for too long
  7. Sporting would be if the fox had an equal opportunity to chase down and rip apart the dogs, horses and humans. Does it have that by any chance?? Sporting would be both sides being equal Does the cowardly human run after the fox on his own??
  8. To determine the success of the project some form of measurement of increased use by cyclists must be in place?? Or are they just using increased travel times as a basis of success??
  9. I was going on your claim to be wheeling, still I will let that slide. Up 5% eh. can you give the link to that report?
  10. I know that I am starting to sound like a broken record now but as none of the pro-cycle lane posters can be bothered to answer. Just how many MORE cyclists have started to use this route?? Is the lack of answer simply because there has been NO increase, or even, god forbid, a DECREASE????
  11. Go on, I know this is a troll, but I'll bite. Increased number of people cycling? So exactly how many MORE people are cycling on Shalesmoor now?? Will they still be doing it come December??
  12. Well what a surprise!! So, no one but themselves to blame for the complete pigs ear they have produced
  13. There I was, sitting in the traffic jam that is now Shalesmoor Road, hoping one day to get to Hillsborough, and I saw a cyclist!!!!! Yes, really a CYCLIST!!! It was on the other side of the road, also heading out of town. Was it on the cycle lane (all be it heading the wrong way)? Nope, it was on the pavement, of course it was, it was a cyclist. So thats money well spent then isnt it, one cyclist, on the pavement, on the wrong side of the road, going the wrong way
  14. So, having asked this question many times with no answer I suppose its pointless asking again. But here goes. How many more cyclists are using this route now its "safe"? Hundreds, tens, a couple? Or has it actually gone down??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.