spooky3

Did I mention the word salary? Did you answer the question?

Oh yes it does

Look, even Lisa Simpson understands it! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity_plus_one EDIT: oops, wrong quote. Even though that last one states that afterwards it is infinity, but at the point of calculation it is theoretically larger.

No you are wrong in your assumptions! So are you really saying we are not being ransomed by the unions / workers for more money off us? Really!

Thankyou, I know. My rules apply to me just as others.

I try to at least show disdain when "my" side does wrong, rather than just totally avoid it and sort of defend the really bad ones.

There's a lot of places which would be surprised not to have snow in July, or all year round for that matter But no, the horrors of war have turned many!

I see Frank as being ironic at times just baiting whingers, but yes he usually has quite a valid point. So does Halibut, just wished he applied it equally.

Double infinity will always be twice the size of the original set of infinity.

No, i'd say Left, but he is selective in what issues he takes the leftist side on, and loves to call people out.

No, what the despicable Taliban do is no excuse to be used to cancel out what we do. But most sensible people will take it into consideration, especially in a case like this where nothing wrong has actually been done, it's only very very insensitive, and should quite rightly be frowned upon. But, maybe this case will change our laws and they won't be allowed to do it in the future without facing stated consequences within our law.

To cover dosxuks' example there is what is known as a a "proper subset", even though they contain the same elements, they are still different sets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_subset

Any which way, you will always fit in somewhere.

Sounds about right to me, but I don't have my trusty book on the subject... and I know they add infinite sets together in that... http://www.amazon.co.uk/Complexity-Cryptography-Introduction-John-Talbot/dp/0521617715/ref=sr_1_1? What dosxuk writes sounds right, but he's acting on the original sets and not the produced sets, almost like going back in time to recreate his sets before his sets were amended. Basically in reality he's using the feedback as a pre-qualifier, which you can't do.

The Americans didn't support them until later (well after they were formed)... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban#Emergence

Yes, certain equations look more confusing than others (and that is a good one), but if you are using it, say in a series, then you start at say 0 and keep incrementing until you reach infinity (never), but each increment is still a number.

But to use it you need to pick an actual number and that can always be bigger.

Not being an expert on the subject by any means, but that sounds pretty apt to me. Definitely left, but not sure where views on immigration plays in this? Hopefully someone better suited can be more precise!

Sorry, I believe you do fit into one category or another. But your argument is one I hear very often from those who call themselves Anarchists. Anarchism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism and further...

But if you are to test it you need to decide on a value of infinity, but you can always double it (or increase it anyhow). So terms such as double infinity are used, there was a very good BBC documentary on the subject a few years ago! Not that I think you need any help in understanding it, but: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_paradox_of_the_Grand_Hotel

I'll double that!

Infinity in most cases is pretty simple to understand. It's when you need to prove a theorem on an infinite set that it's annoying, simply just because you can never test all possibilities, so where do you call time out... but in those cases the fact of testing the infinite set will be declared so others can take heed!

I go to Charles Clifford, and each and every one always asks me if it's alright to treat me, even the teachers, so I think the rules are there too!

I believe they actually have to ask for permission and that needs to be granted.

So we are being held to ransom by the unions, Labour who have influence over them are doing nothing, yet the media still blames the government, when are they going to start asking the unions and Labour difficult questions. Labour are making us pay for their petty squabbles! They will then use this to attack the government, hypocrites!