Sheaf-Field

MI5 had over 5 years to get their story straight, and still failed to satisfy the families. Let alone those who have studied the subject with an open mind and are aware of the clear signs of complicity. It will not be the last word.

Excuse me, did you misread that passage from the "Inquest", please? We are talking about 56 bodies in total. And no full post-mortems carried out on any of them. Just seen Rob's post (thank-you Rob). He quotes context surrounding that passage, which makes it evident that a doctor expressed his surprise that an internal wasn't carried out on Ms. Wundowa's body (he had seen her body, after the explosion outside the BMA, prior to it being transferred to the HAC). So even in that single case, your guess about why there was no full post-mortem does not hold true. Very interesting how he was immediately told not to say anything else about it, and that it would be a "red herring". Just like a public inquiry would be a "ludicrous diversion" according to Phoney Bliar (Tony Blair), who had foreknowledge of the 7/7 attacks and who would be blamed for them. http://mtrial.org/ripple#download

OK. Again, I ask if anyone has a source that indicates a FULL (i.e. internal as well) post-mortem was performed anywhere. Below is a passage from the "Inquest" transcript:- If anyone has information to the contrary, perhaps the "Inquest" would like to hear from you. A FULL post-mortem is vital towards establishing the actual cause of death. I'm sure plenty of coroners would be very surprised, even if privately, to learn these were not carried out on any of the 7/7 victims.

It's internal post-mortem examinations in question, to be specific. And according to what's come out in the "Inquest", no such examinations were carried out anywhere. Do you have a source that indicates differently?

So, basically, the authorities have finally admitted they didn't perform any internal post-mortem examinations in the temporary morgue at the HAC's headquarters (Honourable Artillery Company) in Armoury Road that was set up by De Boers, who were only awarded the contract for such an eventuality the day before the mass murder took place, on the 6th July 2005? Did they offer any explanation as to why? Or are they not bothering with any explanation for that as well?

This is the equivalent of Barack Obama sending the White House spokesman to court, to defend Obama from serious accusations made against him. THIS, is how "seriously" MI5 treats the 7/7 "inquest". And this man Foulkes is one of the most pro-official conspiracy theory of 7/7 bereaved family members, and one of the few they allow on TV and whose statements are printed by newspapers. The answers to his questions, which MI5 refuse to provide him with, can be found in 7/7 Ripple Effect. And the maker of that film is in prison on ludicrous trumped-up charges, as the establishment does all it can to cover-up the truth and to scare others from speaking up by making an example of John Hill. http://mtrial.org

You all are aware, I hope, of a character named Martin McDaid? Converted to Islam my arse. And ex-anti-terror? I'm sure he worked for that crowd, but they are pro-terror. "War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength." He (McDaid) says he didn't preach violence but Martin Gilbertson contradicts him. Mr Gilbertson was ignored by the police and MI5:- And where is Martin McDaid now? Nobody appears to know. Other than MI5/6, who must know. If you are looking for who arranged the bathroom of the rented property in Leeds to look like a bomb-making factory, you need look no further than McDaid, who had the expertise and was allowed to use Khan's car, etc. The property itself belonged to an Egyptian, who McDaid claimed had nothing to do with all this and was a "sweet person". Obviously another agent and colleague of McDaid in the employ of the (IN-)Security (DIS-)Services. It all stinks to high heaven. As for Tanweer's alleged "girlfriend". What's her name? No-one's bothered to mention she's an ANONYMOUS witness. If you know enough of the murky context surrounding 7/7, involving MI5 and "ex"-special forces members and military-grade explosives and Ian Blair's, Tony Blair's and Mossad's foreknowledge, then you can't POSSIBLY take an anonymous "testimony" seriously. Especially so when delivered at a so-called "inquest" where the outcome was acknowledged by those overseeing it to be pre-determined from the very start - the four Muslims "did it", and not up for debate. Theatre. MI5 are very good at it.

I've been checking on this thread again, after having posts deleted with no explanation (even after politely requesting one, which only serves to confirm the suspicion there was no good reason for doing so) in the thread about John Hill which was locked. And I have some questions and an observation to share (if I'm please allowed to). Is there any proof that it is unLawful to send unsolicited material under the Amicus Curiae principle to a court? Any precedent of anyone having done this being prosecuted for "doing an act tending or intended to pervert the course of public justice"? Any precedent of anyone sending DVDs of a publicly available film to a court, being treated in the criminal, evil manner that John Hill is being treated? Also, it is most revealing to note how the childish, evil games the Prison (Dis)Service and the (Mis)judge are playing, in physically preventing John from attending his bail hearings and then in not granting him bail without him being present; go without comment by what are popularly known as "shills", who instead have both the ignorance and the gall to allege that John Hill is his own worst enemy... when somebody "high up" is so afraid of him that they have cowardly and criminally prevented him from attending court TWICE now. Actions speak louder than words. Don't they? It's like a football match (except far more serious) where one team prevents the other team from stepping onto the field to actually play the match. And then, the one team kicks off and starts shouting abuse at the team that is being prevented from playing: "you're rubbish, you're your own worst enemies", etc. What would sensible people think of that? Would they put any stock in the claims that the unsporting team was making? Or would they see that one team was afraid of the other but were desperately trying to deny this to themselves? These "shills", like all the policy enforcers and judges who have acted criminally towards John Hill (one of a very long list of innocent men to suffer at their hands); keep pretending to give a whit about justice. So why is it that the only "justice" they seem to be familiar with, and support, as they have continuously displayed here, is INjustice? What has happened to these people, to make them like this? Why don't they question this and seek to find out what is wrong with them? Surely it would be the logical thing to do, so they can then find the cure for it.

Agreed, Rob. Well-said. These obvious warnings can only be "threats" to Satan, who is the only one who knows he is going to burn for sure. No reprieve for him. Even so, he was warned prior to his decision to continue his rebellion, so he knew the consequences. So when others start calling the warnings "threats" too, without any good reason for doing so, it should tell them something (who is the one telling them they are "threats"?). Unfortunately (for them) his grip on them is strong and we know he doesn't let go easily, and that without Father's Help it's impossible. How they can obtain Father's help through calling His warnings "threats" beats me. The fact the warnings have reached them means that Father is striving to help them too, but sadly they are rejecting it and Him with their freewill. They don't know what manner of spirit they are, even as they demonstrate it to one and all. Near-total blindness.

Hear, hear. It's not their "jurisdiction" over him that is being challenged. It's their "jurisdiction", full stop. For they have none.

I'm with you on not arguing anymore. No point doing so with obvious swine that maintain there's nothing wrong with what is being done to him. John 3 12 If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? People can read Muad'Dib's works for themselves, in their proper context, and decide for themselves if it has the ring of truth or not. Chapter 12 of The Way home or face The Fire, is recommended. http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.net Over and out.

I could write it in plain English again, but it wouldn't change one bit.

Let's add some context to that:- Revelation 11:18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth. Matthew 24:22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. That is what comes before the Day of Judgment. As a result of forsaking His Law and Commandments for so long, and because of less and less Love for his neighbour, mankind will be on the verge of completely destroying itself and the planet. And without God's Intervention that is exactly what would happen. As humans, if Father did not intervene, the humans would all be dead anyway. As spirit-beings, they shall be Judged, and we are told that MANY shall be executed. Christ is here on a rescue Mission. He is the only Way out. Already, some of the Tokens (Signs) of the End Times are being fulfilled, and things are accelerating fast. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41062817/ns/business-consumer_news 2 Esdras 5:6 And even he shall rule, [Christ] whom they look not for that dwell upon the Earth, and the fowls shall take their flight away together: 2 Esdras 6:22 (ii) And suddenly shall the sown places appear unsown, the full storehouses shall suddenly be found empty (of food, including the seas from over-fishing): 2 Esdras 16:21 Behold, victuals shall be so good cheap upon earth, that they shall think themselves to be in good case, and even then shall evils grow upon earth, sword, famine, and great confusion. The time will come when many will regret the days they have lived to see. Men of literature will be neglected. Falsehood and deceit will prevail. Chapels and shrines will be plundered. Sacred things will become the prey of thieves. Learning will be oppressed and hence they will be brought low. The powerful will oppress the poor with false laws and perverted judgement (James 5:4), and the aged and infirm will regret the time they have lived to see. Strife and war will rage in every family. Good neighbourhood will disappear and many will be treated with disrespect. The trees shall not bear fruit. There will be cold and hunger, malice, hatred and bad weather, and only the leaves on the trees will show the difference between Summer and Winter. Men and women will fly in the air without wings, and will travel from one country to another under the ground (Channel Tunnel). Pounds will be filled with cattle and jails with men. Milk over the country will be churned in one churn. Diseases will abound and remedies will fail. Every race of mankind will become more wicked and all classes will be addicted to robbery. Such is the description of people who will live in the ages to come. Maidens will be unblushing and marriages without witnesses. Columcille (521-597 AD). http://jahtruth.net/signs.htm In 1988, in the City of Sheffield, Muad'Dib served a writ on Elizabeth Windsor/Mountbatten and the government. Instead of admitting the writ, the "authorities" arrested, imprisoned and prosecuted him, charging him with making "threats". After spending some time in prison, during which he wrote the following Handbook for Prisoners, Prison Officers and Governors:- http://jahtruth.net/prison.htm , the hearing came. The "judge" quickly pointed out to the prosecution, that the only threats, or warnings, in the writ, were when the defendant (Muad'Dib) was quoting Christ's warnings from the Bible. So the prosecution would have to claim and prove that Muad'Dib was Christ in order for the charges against him to have any substance. They decided not to do so. And the "judge" threw out the case against Muad'Dib. After he had spent months unLawfully imprisoned. So how about you, since you seem to be doing a bit of "prosecuting" here, do you believe that it is Christ quoting Christ on what is going to happen?

Thank-you. I know what he asked. It doesn't look like you understood the answer I gave so I'll phrase it differently. It is not my place to think anyone deserves to die. Neither is it my place to think anyone doesn't deserve to die. Both these things are The Judge's (God's) prerogative, for it is He Who gave us life in the first place. Okay. There's nothing random about it. For example, someone can say he is a "Christian". But what he calls himself, or what others call him, doesn't necessarily mean I believe he is such. Hence the use of quotation marks, to indicate that's what they call themselves, without implying my agreement with the label. In this world, the "Christians" don't follow Christ. The "Jews" aren't really Jews. "Israel" is not really Israel. "Laws" aren't really Lawful. "Father's" (some priests) aren't really Father (and moreover are disobeying Christ when He said call no man on earth your father). Etc. It would be nice to not have to use quotation marks so often. Does it make sense to me? Jedi stands for Jesus Disciple. The star war refers to the war in heaven, which Satan and his followers lost, and is mentioned by several Prophets and in ancient texts. One's own soul will also know that it is fallen. The Earth is bad and full of evil because the evil Satan and his evil followers were imprisoned on Earth and they are being allowed to run the show for the time being. The inmates are running (or ruining) the asylum. If The Force, Who is God, is real, and God talks telepathically to people; then it would be a marvel of marvels that a film that explains near-perfectly about The Force was made without The Force's involvement. Episodes 4-6 contain numerous scenes and dialogue that are practically straight out of the Bible, as well as the overall theme of the battle between Good and evil, and those who cherish their freedom and those who like the police-state (the Empire). Muad'Dib explains more about this in the following booklet:- http://jahtruth.net/starwar.htm God has inspired a lot of music, poetry, prose, inventions, etc. When we listen to a piece of music that touches our soul, and we think it's a little taste of heaven, chances are that's exactly what it is. I mean, the music just comes to people's minds, at least when it's truly inspired. They didn't "create" it, or consciously "think it" into existence, it simply comes to them as a gift. From Who? How different to that so-called "music" which is not inspired, and is instead seemingly artificially constructed to appeal to the more carnal senses, or is just someone's egotistic rant accompanied by noise masquerading as music. When one accepts that a) God is very real, and that b) He has inspired such works of art and messages etc all throughout history, then the notion that The Force made a film to explain some things about Himself is actually not far-fetched in the least. If one doesn't already accept a) and b), then obviously it makes no sense, and one will not be inclined to seek to understand what Muad'Dib thinks the message in Star Wars is. And the latter is more important than whether one agrees that The Force guided George Lucas or not. http://jahtruth.net/starwar.htm Because even though they might not be Sodomites, they still aren't "straight"? http://jahtruth.net/resure.htm Muad'Dib answers your question in his Book, Chapter 6. http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.net

I understand that many sodomites die from AIDS. So very little belief comes into it. But you asked what I personally believe. So I'll tell you some of what I believe. I have not written the Script for Life. I now seek to understand it, after years of vainly complaining about it and arrogantly believing that "if I were God I'd do things differently". These days, the more I understand, the more I'm aware of how little I knew/know, especially in this respect. I believe that God is Good. That He, His Voice, is Who/What many people refer to as "their Conscience" (that is ignored more often than not by selfish instincts or the false indoctrinated belief that man's "laws" and/or customs carry more weight than God's). That everything that happens is for a reason, and that when He says "this is wrong", He is right every single time, even if the reason/s for it do not become apparent till later. I believe, and can also see, that sin leads to death. I believe Muad'Dib should be thanked for helping to show people what is really happening, so they can do something about it, instead of accused for spoiling the "party" that will drag so many into The Fire (in which I also believe). I believe, and also know, that I'm here because I'm crazy, and that the craziest of all are the ones who don't know, or don't want to accept, that they are crazy; in spite of the many times in their short lives they have acted crazily, and have been selfish and hurt their fellow brothers and sisters either physically or emotionally or spiritually, which should have given them a clue. Some, if not all, have also hurt themselves not just others. Open your (spiritual) eyes and you will see that sadists and masochists (to greater or lesser degrees) populate this planet. However, there is a part in all of us that is not altogether crazy, that still survives and believes that Good MUST triumph over evil. The sleeper MUST awaken. Or as Jesus said, you must be born again, from above. http://jahtruth.net/godgovmt.htm I find it most ironic that some here have commented Muad'Dib should be locked up in a mental institution for "being crazy", when that, in fact, is what all of us are in, for the same reason. And Muad'Dib is the only person who doesn't belong here for that reason, having come to help. "None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. I understand that they fit what has been, and is, going on. Again, very little belief comes into that, because it can actually be seen. I don't see any means of knowing for sure who physically wrote the Protocols and to me this is not important. It was Eric Arthur Blair (presumably) who wrote 1984 but he wrote it under the name George Orwell. The name of the person who physically wrote that book is of little consequence. What's important is what the content reveals. What I do know is that the intelligence/source of these evil and sly methods (the Protocols) of subjugating people and nations is Satan, and that the wicked in high places, whether they call themselves "Jews" or "Protestants" or whatever, are implementing many of them. Everyone should read them for this reason, including "Jews", who have been warned by their own Prophets many times about the conspirators amongst them. "Be innocent as doves, yet wise as serpents." Show me a collective that does not sin, whether they be "Jews" or sodomites or anything else, and I will accept that they are a fine people, and not deluded in thinking they are a fine people. None of you have been 100% accurately transmitting Muad'Dib's views. There has been plenty of spin or outright untruth contained in the transmissions, some of which I've pointed out previously. All his views are good, from a certain (for sure) point of view. John 3 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Those who read his Book with an open mind, instead of setting out to find something to pick bones with, should see that the reason he condemns sinning is because he cares about us. Whereas those who condone sinning don't care much at all or haven't yet realized that sin = death. And that the reason he encourages people to read the Protocols as well is to gain a better understanding of the nature and character of the real enemy, and the methods being employed by those who serve him, whether consciously or unconsciously. "Know your enemy" - Sun Tzu.