Jump to content

Jag82

Banned
  • Content Count

    341
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Neutral

About Jag82

  • Rank
    Registered User
  1. She has a better understanding of it than you realise ! Infinity is not 'The biggest number' it is a concept. you can add 1, 2 or 3 to infinty the answer is infinity. There isn't 'one infinity' some infinities are bigger than others ! Google 'Hilbert's hotel' alternatively ask your daughter
  2. They mean 1,000,000,000 they use trilion to describe 1,000,000,000,000 Standard form billion 1x10^9 trillion 1x10^12
  3. The US and to a much lesser extent Aussie boys suffered due to their own Governments bad policy decisions. The UK thankfully managed to stay out of that one. Those that served their Nation over there received scant thanks for their sacrifice by their Governments. Note the criticism of Government Policy not the US Nation per se. The day the US Public remembers the reason for overthrowing the British Crown and selects themselves a decent President, Senate and Representatives is the day when the US will approximate paradise on earth.
  4. Did the Vietnam adventure succeed in any meaningful way
  5. The Communists are responsible for millions more deaths than the Nazis. I have no desire to make it all right again, time travels forward only (unless you have a time machine). The American Indians should have slaughtered the Whites in order to defend their lands, they failed therefore they were dispossessed. My fathers and brothers took the land and they should hold it. You see I acknowledge that atrocities are an historical fact of life, we are where we are. You on the other hand go on about Brit Atrocities and thereby condemn yourself for living where you do. Seeing the distinction yet?
  6. Should British uniforms be banned for having been worn by a Nation that conquered a large part of the globe? Should Communist uniforms be banned for murdering 10's of millions?
  7. I'm not anti-American, I have no love for the US Government but then again the same is true of the British Government. YOU seem to want to denounce what you see as British Atrocities and yet are content to benefit from them.
  8. I am well aware of the above. It seems a trifle hypocritical on your part to go on about 'British Atrocities' when you chose to take US Nationality thereby benefitting from the very atrocities that you seek to condemn (when it suits you). Think further than the immediate question in future you'll minimize embarrassment.
  9. Wearing a cop uniform to a party doesn't imply that you are going to fail to find a murdered child after 3 searches nor does it imply that you are going to kill a drunk walking down the road. Cop uniforms are ok at parties, Commie uniforms are ok (Millions died at their hands) so why not Nazi uniforms.
  10. The atrocities of men largely British or of British extraction committed atrocities against the Real Americans (The aboriginal natives). How do you stand as an ex-Brit and current-Yank on that one? Do you wish to hand the US back?
  11. Most murders in UK are not shootings. People with guns are better able to kill armed criminals.
  12. 1)They will always acquire weapons. 2)Easier to defend against copycats who will also always acquire weapons. 3) If they want to be martyred so be it, let's make it easier to martyr them. 4) One can only do ones best in the circumstances, being armed with a strawberry mivvi against guns/smoke bombs/night vision goggles is a somewhat greater disadvantage than being armed with a .38 or 9mm against guns/smoke bombs/night vision goggles. 5) Always a possibility perhaps the SAS should use strawberry mivvis and resort to stern language.
  13. Innocent people have died because a murderer went to the pictures armed. Had some decent people been armed the murderer may well have been killed before exacting the death toll he did. The logic of your post is that the evil will always carry arms and hurt people, those that are decent and humane shouldn't bear arms ergo the humane and decent must not only go in fear of their own lives but they must be prevented from aiding their fellow man in the event of something like this. There are none so blind as those that will not see.
  14. Why? The poster correctly points out that they would have been able to defend themselves, is she incorrect? is it wrong to defend oneself? please enlighten one and all as to the nature of the issues that you have in mind.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.