Sheffield Forum
Your message here

Ian Botham or Freddie Flintoff
Home > General Forums > General Sports Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20-04-2004, 09:02   #1
Bedhead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Total Posts: 1,133
just wondering what you guys thought about who you think was/is the better player?
Flintoff is at a relatively early stage of his career but shows all the signs of becoming a Botham - i think they're very much of the same mould - or not? Botham was always such an exciting batsman to watch although very often gave away a cheap wicket - flintoffs batting seems to be coming on these days and is becoming more 'solid'

i will never forget the ashes match in 1981 at the Oval !!!
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links - Register and/or Login to hide this ad.
Old 20-04-2004, 15:04   #2
Lickszz
Registered User
 
Lickszz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sheffield
Total Posts: 4,624
Botham was an excellent all rounder. I've not seen enough of Flintoff so I can't really comment. You mention about Botham giving his wicket away cheaply, I think the same can be said of Brian Lara who is an excellent batsman when all is going well but never seems to be able to bat through when the going is tough.
__________________
Little lost sometimes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04-2004, 20:55   #3
Bedhead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Total Posts: 1,133
reading my post again i haven't mentioned anything about their bowling ability but i mean to include that of course - i think here they're pretty evenly matched too with flintoff being slightly quicker but botham was able to swing the ball a lot more

and yes i probably agree with lara in that he can sometimes be a little inconsistent but he is none the less a great great batsmen - i think he probably averages above 50 - not the greatest captain though
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04-2004, 21:14   #4
Untouchable
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Total Posts: 34
Id have to say neither !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04-2004, 21:26   #5
Lickszz
Registered User
 
Lickszz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sheffield
Total Posts: 4,624
I think on the whole I would rather have Tendulkar in my team than Lara as I thik Tendulkar is the more reliable of the 2. Botham was also a great fielder on his day he could be the hero.
__________________
Little lost sometimes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04-2004, 22:21   #6
Untouchable
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Total Posts: 34
Nah not tendulkar
id stick with Lara, they guy performs when it really matters. Someone breaks his record and then he goes and retains his record by breaking it again. That shows class. May i say against England on both occasions on the very same ground.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04-2004, 22:31   #7
Lickszz
Registered User
 
Lickszz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sheffield
Total Posts: 4,624
More too cricket than breaking the occasional record though. Tendulkar is much better at protecting his wicket when needing that all important innings and is able to grind out a innings. I've seen Lara get out all too often with some silly unnecessary shots.
__________________
Little lost sometimes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-04-2004, 22:43   #8
Untouchable
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Total Posts: 34
ok but his performance has been mixed not been on the good side because unlike Tendulkar, Lara has the added responsibility of captaining his nation. Look at Stewart, he had better days wid the bat when a wicketkeeper than when he was capatin (on the odd occation).
Lara has scored more than 9,000 Test runs and 8,500 in one-day internationals and his is the wicket bowlers prize most when facing West Indies.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21-04-2004, 08:58   #9
GazB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sheffield
Total Posts: 2,745
Quote:
Ian Botham or Freddie Flintoff
I thought it was Andrew Flintoff

Or am I missing something?

Gaz
  Reply With Quote
Old 21-04-2004, 10:39   #10
Bedhead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Total Posts: 1,133
Quote:
Originally posted by GazB
I thought it was Andrew Flintoff

Or am I missing something?

Gaz
well yea but he's affectionatley known as 'freddie'
  Reply With Quote
Old 21-04-2004, 22:01   #11
Untouchable
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Total Posts: 34
errrrmmm yeh

but culdnt think of anything to talk bout freddie or erm botham !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2005, 18:08   #12
Freebird
Registered User
 
Freebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Somewhere In Time
Total Posts: 412
Send a message via MSN to Freebird
Just Dug This One Up From Over A Year Ago.Anyone Wish To Comment?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2005, 19:01   #13
rosie
Guest
 
Total Posts: n/a
They are both fantastic players but you cant compare one with the other as the opponents they play against are different.
We are looking at different generations and how more rules they play with, how faster they bowl, skill has changed and they now wear more protection.

You can therefore say Botham was the best English all round player of his time and Flintoff, is at the moment the best all rounder England have.

But thats a womans opinion
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2005, 17:22   #14
the_rudeboy
ruder than you
 
the_rudeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Total Posts: 9,311
Send a message via MSN to the_rudeboy
I can't really comment as i've not seen the Ian Botham cartoon.
__________________
TOP TIP: Recreate your very own version of the Hungry Hippo’s game by going along to a Weight Watchers meeting and emptying a box of Maltesers on the floor.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT. The time now is 14:48.
POSTS ON THIS FORUM ARE NOT ACTIVELY MONITORED
Click "Report Post" under any post which may breach our terms of use.
©2002-2012 SheffieldForum.co.uk | Powered by vBulletin ©2013