|
|
26-08-2011, 12:32
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham,UK
Total Posts: 10
|
Yes,we can see the prices is mostly increasing these days.I got some search and here's what i found.A diesel releases less carbon dioxide into the air because it is more fuel efficient.
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 12:37
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Totley
Total Posts: 8,864
|
No contest, diesel every time for me, I've has 4 1.9 tdi's in the past 16 years, and am just about to step up to a 2.2 tdi. They tend to be more reliable than petrol, due to fewer electrics I guess.
However if you expect to be stuck in traffic jams on a regular basis remember they rev at circa 1000, so you're burning far more fuel than a petrol with a low rev tick over.
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 12:47
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Total Posts: 11,021
Status: Online
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crookesey
No contest, diesel every time for me, I've has 4 1.9 tdi's in the past 16 years, and am just about to step up to a 2.2 tdi. They tend to be more reliable than petrol, due to fewer electrics I guess.
However if you expect to be stuck in traffic jams on a regular basis remember they rev at circa 1000, so you're burning far more fuel than a petrol with a low rev tick over.
|
My diesel mondeo idles at about 800 rpm... the fuel computer says it uses 0.1 gall/hr at idle..
__________________
Only the mediocre are at their best everyday
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 13:10
|
#24
|
|
Account Closed
Join Date: Aug 2009
Total Posts: 4,434
|
If I'm stuck in traffic I turn the engine off. You're getting 0mpg, same as if you left the engine running, but you're not using any fuel either.
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 13:58
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Total Posts: 192
|
????????????????????????????
Last edited by shand1; 17-03-2012 at 13:39.
Reason: If SF can delete my posts so can i ........
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 14:17
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Totley
Total Posts: 8,864
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number Six
If I'm stuck in traffic I turn the engine off. You're getting 0mpg, same as if you left the engine running, but you're not using any fuel either. 
|
You use quite a bit of fuel starting it, don't tell me that you push it.
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 14:41
|
#27
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Total Posts: 4,198
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shand1
That was the case a few years ago when diesel pumps were all mechanical, but it's a different story these days, most modern diesels have electronic involvement/control & common rail systems, not to mention potential turbo, egr & associated problems!
|
Diesel pumps are still mechanical - you need one to generate the high rail pressures. You also have to have mechanical injectors to open at the right time.
__________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. We contend that for a nation to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 14:42
|
#28
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Total Posts: 4,198
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crookesey
You use quite a bit of fuel starting it, don't tell me that you push it. 
|
Not really. A diesel starts with almost no fuel, same as a hot petrol engine will - they don't need richening on start like a petrol from cold would.
__________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. We contend that for a nation to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 14:51
|
#29
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Total Posts: 3,318
|
Diesel. Never touch a petrol again.
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 15:21
|
#30
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Total Posts: 218
|
From past experience petrol cars have been much more reliable than diesel cars maybe because in petrol cars there is less to go wrong?
|
|
|
|
26-08-2011, 15:29
|
#31
|
|
Account Closed
Join Date: Aug 2009
Total Posts: 4,434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamss
From past experience petrol cars have been much more reliable than diesel cars maybe because in petrol cars there is less to go wrong?
|
The engines are similar but different. An 'old' diesel is simpler than a modern petrol. A modern diesel is more complicated than an 'old' petrol.
Modern versions of both are quite complicated.
|
|
|
|
27-08-2011, 12:02
|
#32
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Total Posts: 218
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number Six
The engines are similar but different. An 'old' diesel is simpler than a modern petrol. A modern diesel is more complicated than an 'old' petrol.
Modern versions of both are quite complicated.
|
The new common rail diesels fitted to most cars are terribly unreliable or so ive heard?
|
|
|
|
27-08-2011, 12:18
|
#33
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mungo
Total Posts: 1,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamss
The new common rail diesels fitted to most cars are terribly unreliable or so ive heard?
|
Untrue, based on the volumes sold a few bad stories is not indicative of their reliability
Plenty of other stories of CR diesels with interstellar mileage, which have only had routine servicing (ask taxi drivers!)
In any case, petrol cars will soon all be common rail, with high pressure pumps using exactly the same technology
__________________
l like to play with things ...
before annihilation.
|
|
|
|
27-08-2011, 13:15
|
#34
|
|
Account Closed
Join Date: Aug 2009
Total Posts: 4,434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamss
The new common rail diesels fitted to most cars are terribly unreliable or so ive heard?
|
As emporer ming says, there are diesel cars doing tens of thousands of miles each and every day. look at the back of cars as you drive around - most new ones seem to be diesel - and you don't see many cars broken down.
Personally I've done 130k or so with two diesel engines in the last 8 years or so and I've not had any problems.
|
|
|
|
27-08-2011, 18:18
|
#35
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Total Posts: 218
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number Six
As emporer ming says, there are diesel cars doing tens of thousands of miles each and every day. look at the back of cars as you drive around - most new ones seem to be diesel - and you don't see many cars broken down.
Personally I've done 130k or so with two diesel engines in the last 8 years or so and I've not had any problems.
|
Which engine is it as ive heard the TDCI engines in fords are common rail?
|
|
|
|
27-08-2011, 19:29
|
#36
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Totley
Total Posts: 8,864
|
Committed petrol heads hate diesel, folk converted to diesel don't hate petrol, we just find in diesel vehicles something that suits us, we are not car fanatics, and have no issue with car fanatical petrol heads.
That is how I feel about matters, I don't love my car, I quite like it as long as it serves me well, I really go for an overall 45 mpg, and don't mind a 0 to 60 of 10 seconds.
How do you guys feel?
|
|
|
|
27-08-2011, 19:45
|
#37
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Total Posts: 40
|
For arsonists it has to be the 4 star, diesel's no good, it doesn't go up.
Last edited by Bigger tree; 27-08-2011 at 19:53.
Reason: Trust me to spell diesel wrong!!
|
|
|
|
27-08-2011, 21:07
|
#38
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Total Posts: 12
|
Diesel for me! I recently bought a 1 litre petrol corsa and it was the most fuel thirsty car I ever owned! Now got a diesel version. 48mpg knocking about and 64 on a run.
I dont think I would have a modern high mileage diesel though. The engines may be fine but the pumps will cost a fortune if they go wrong.
|
|
|
|
28-08-2011, 20:19
|
#39
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Total Posts: 218
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bogstandard
Diesel for me! I recently bought a 1 litre petrol corsa and it was the most fuel thirsty car I ever owned! Now got a diesel version. 48mpg knocking about and 64 on a run.
I dont think I would have a modern high mileage diesel though. The engines may be fine but the pumps will cost a fortune if they go wrong.
|
I think its because with a small petrol car its needs to be revved hard to get it going where as with a small diesel the turbo gives it that extra oomph so it drinks less diesel.
|
|
|
|
30-08-2011, 12:05
|
#40
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Total Posts: 11,021
Status: Online
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamss
The new common rail diesels fitted to most cars are terribly unreliable or so ive heard?
|
I've had 3 common rail diesels over the past 9 years and done a total of around 400,000 miles in them without a problem...
__________________
Only the mediocre are at their best everyday
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:27.
POSTS ON THIS FORUM ARE NOT ACTIVELY MONITORED Click "Report Post" under any post which may breach our terms of use.
|