[salmonbones]

Originally Posted by Malky

No its definitely still there.

Owned by Scarborough Holdings, a method of getting rid of some of the debts of Sheffield Utd Football Club owe.

Just like when McCabe converted some debt into shares.

Just like when McCabe will "sell" the ground to Scarborough holdings and rent it back to SUFC in return for nullifying around 30Million pound of the debt that SUFC currently owe (not the full amount!)

[TAT]

Originally Posted by salmonbones

No, Hirst's full interview said that "some people might be viewing it as the first stage of amalgamation" but he had been "assured" that this certainly was not the case, and he could see that this was a very good business deal, and good for the city of Sheffield as a whole.

I thought Hirsty was quite well spoken.

I HOPE YOU GET THE CHANCE TO SEE THE INTERVIEWS AGAIN! and able correct your post

He (Hirsty) said when he saw it, he feared it may be the first stage of an amalgamation, but had beed reassured this was not the case.

Currie however was much more realistic, humourous and passionate.

[Robbie Loving]

On topic guys..... which is the sponsorship deals of United and Wednesday

[Grandad.Malky]

Originally Posted by salmonbones

Owned by Scarborough Holdings, a method of getting rid of some of the debts of Sheffield Utd Football Club owe.

Just like when McCabe converted some debt into shares.

Just like when McCabe will "sell" the ground to Scarborough holdings and rent it back to SUFC in return for nullifying around 30Million pound of the debt that SUFC currently owe (not the full amount!)

What is wrong with shufflinmg the deck, dont have all your eggs in one basket and all that

If westfield are haviing their name on the shirts will they still sponsor the corner stand?

[Grappler]

Originally Posted by salmonbones

Well i'd imagine the arguments will go something like:-

One club has recently had more fans turn up through gates and was more recently a top flight side.

Opposed to Wednesday still being seen as the first name on many football fans lips when you talk about "Sheffield football" and the dislike for Utd by many football fans outside Sheffield over the Tevez and fairness in football stuff.I would imagine it's the same deal for both though as we are plying our trade in the exact same arena and no one knows how the crowds will play out next season - it could be even or one team could come out on top, we just don't know yet.

Can you back that up? doubt it, I work all over the world, never mind the UK and Wednesday is definitely not the first name always mentioned in connection with Sheffield football, and the only person who mentions the Tevez affair is a London lad I work with, who is born and bred West Ham, and even he hardly mentions it these days. The rest of the 6,000 people I work with never mention Tevez, it's history.

Still, if it makes you happy believing it.

[Earwiggo]

Originally Posted by salmonbones

Neither do Sheffield United.

Looking for a hotel?

Kevin McCabe's got a pokey one somewhere near Heeley I've heard.

Good news for both clubs, for Westfield, and for Gilders, all good publicity, and yeah, I agree, EVERY club should feature a charity on their shirts, and around the ground to help whenever the ground is shown on telly.

[Veritas]

Originally Posted by salmonbones

Just like when McCabe will "sell" the ground to Scarborough holdings and rent it back to SUFC in return for nullifying around 30Million pound of the debt that SUFC currently owe (not the full amount!)

Well you seem very sure of your figures can you tell us what the full amount of the debt is and when Mccabe will take Bramall lane in lieu of part of it ?