Sheffield Forum
Blackpool Tower sized windfarms
Home > Sheffield Forums > Sheffield Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2008, 21:51   #1
daisymom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Total Posts: 20
Please stop Barnsley Council allowing one of the biggest windfarms ever built in Britain and destroying Sheffield's beautiful countryside. This proposal is on Barnsley land but affects Stocksbridge and Deepcar hugely. Sheffield must wake up to what Barnsley MBC is up to.
In May 2008 a planning application was submitted to Barnsley MBC for the erection of five 410ft (125m) wind turbines across the hillside between the Stocksbridge valley and Penistone. They will be sited from the top of Underbank Lane across the hill to Cranberry Crossroads and beyond visible by everyone on the opposite side of the valley in Stocksbridge, Deepcar and Midhopestones.
The proposed wind turbines are HUGE, and will be some of the biggest in the country. To put it into perspective, each turbine will be nearly the height of Blackpool Tower! In a local context they are almost 2½ times bigger than those already sited at Royd Moor on the way to Huddersfield. This means digging out the earth to site them, destroying wildlife (badgers, bat, birds) and widening roads to get the structures in. They'll distract motorists on one of Britain's most dangerous roads and shouldn't be permitted. The action group which has been founded is not against green energy - just in the right place.
Anyone wanting more info should check out the Protect Sheephouse Heights website or PM me for links.
to find out how to object before its too late.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 21:54   #2
cgksheff
Registered User
 
cgksheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Total Posts: 16,490
Status: Online
http://www.protectsheephouseheights.co.uk/

http://www.sheephouseheightswindfarm...e-your-say.asp

http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Height...ant.4229478.jp

Last edited by cgksheff; 10-07-2008 at 21:56.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links - Register and/or Login to hide this ad.
Old 10-07-2008, 22:03   #3
Hook
Registered User
 
Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oughtibridge
Total Posts: 2,779
a) they're beautiful
b) it's better for the environment than building another coal-powered station.

I'm for it.
__________________
January Photography Competition - Everybody on the forum can enter! This month's subject is 'the chill'. HAVE A GO!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:06   #4
Fantomas
Registered User
 
Fantomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sheffield innit
Total Posts: 960
Me too - sorry people but I really don't see the problem.
__________________
\m/ (*_*) \m/
http://www.myspace.com/bramboline
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:09   #5
Hook
Registered User
 
Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oughtibridge
Total Posts: 2,779
I've registered my support with both the company planning to erect the windfarm and the council.
__________________
January Photography Competition - Everybody on the forum can enter! This month's subject is 'the chill'. HAVE A GO!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:15   #6
daisymom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Total Posts: 20
Get real. If you want our countryside to be destroyed then go ahead. These windfarms are ineffective and in other parts of Europe (which woke upto green power long before us) they're turning back to more traditional power methods. These things just don't do the job. It might ease your green conscience and it might meet eco quotas for hard-pressed councils but other than that it's a big, fat waste of time at a huge environmental expense.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:16   #7
Alastair
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Total Posts: 4,287
I'll be objecting, I hate those windfarms in areas of natural beauty.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:16   #8
Hook
Registered User
 
Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oughtibridge
Total Posts: 2,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by daisymom View Post
Get real. If you want our countryside to be destroyed then go ahead. These windfarms are ineffective and in other parts of Europe (which woke upto green power long before us) they're turning back to more traditional power methods. These things just don't do the job. It might ease your green conscience and it might meet eco quotas for hard-pressed councils but other than that it's a big, fat waste of time at a huge environmental expense.
Facts to back that up please. Would also appreciate if you kept the insults out of it. We're allowed to have different opinions I'm afraid, the world would be a very boring place if we didn't.
__________________
January Photography Competition - Everybody on the forum can enter! This month's subject is 'the chill'. HAVE A GO!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:18   #9
libuse
Registered User
 
libuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Total Posts: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by daisymom View Post
They'll distract motorists on one of Britain's most dangerous roads and shouldn't be permitted.
They possibly shouldn't be on the road if they can't drive past a few tall structures without losing control of their vehicles? Personally I'd rather have wind farms than most other forms of electricity generation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:27   #10
Longcol
Registered User
 
Longcol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nothing but the best and later for the garbage
Total Posts: 7,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alastair View Post
I'll be objecting, I hate those windfarms in areas of natural beauty.
Not wonderfully beautiful up there and very rarely (if ever) visited. Seems like a good idea to me. Not that visible from Deepcar and a fair bit of Stocksbridge.
__________________
Helping people escape from Rovvrum since 1991.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:31   #11
Kristian
Bincing Beast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Total Posts: 4,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alastair View Post
I'll be objecting, I hate those windfarms in areas of natural beauty.
Natural beauty? It's overlooking Stocksbridge, and therefore most probably the steel works; I wouldn't call that an area of natural beauty.

More power to their elbow I say. It's got to be a lot better than a nuclear power station in the area.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:35   #12
Longcol
Registered User
 
Longcol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nothing but the best and later for the garbage
Total Posts: 7,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by daisymom View Post
They will be sited from the top of Underbank Lane across the hill to Cranberry Crossroads and beyond visible by everyone on the opposite side of the valley in Stocksbridge, Deepcar and Midhopestones.
Locals call it Midhope (pronounced Mid-up) - Midhopestones is name used by the would be Hebden Bridge set.
__________________
Helping people escape from Rovvrum since 1991.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:43   #13
Grissom
Blood 'n' Bugs
 
Grissom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Photo Forum as a GL
Total Posts: 4,037
I'm all for the turbines. Have completed the survey

These rubber-necking drivers should be taken off the road if they're that dopey. It'd be better for the environment too
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:44   #14
probedb
.
 
Assistant Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Total Posts: 3,935
The wildlife will recover....nature is good like that. Distract motorists? How so?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:46   #15
ptigga
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Walkley
Total Posts: 895
If the windfarms proove to be as ineffective as you believe them to be then they will be dismantled leaving nothing more than the concrete plinths, which will be broken up by weeds in a few years.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:49   #16
cgksheff
Registered User
 
cgksheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Total Posts: 16,490
Status: Online
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptigga View Post
If the windfarms proove to be as ineffective as you believe them to be then they will be dismantled .....
...or, more likely, continue to be maintained at public expense to satisfy various political ambitions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:54   #17
Hook
Registered User
 
Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oughtibridge
Total Posts: 2,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgksheff View Post
...or, more likely, continue to be maintained at public expense to satisfy various political ambitions.
Yet nobody has provided any statistics to prove that they are ineffective and not worth their salt.
__________________
January Photography Competition - Everybody on the forum can enter! This month's subject is 'the chill'. HAVE A GO!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:55   #18
Hook
Registered User
 
Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oughtibridge
Total Posts: 2,779
Here's some info that supports wind farms and proves they're an effective form of sustainable technology:
http://www.withouthotair.com/
__________________
January Photography Competition - Everybody on the forum can enter! This month's subject is 'the chill'. HAVE A GO!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 22:55   #19
Longcol
Registered User
 
Longcol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nothing but the best and later for the garbage
Total Posts: 7,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgksheff View Post
...or, more likely, continue to be maintained at public expense to satisfy various political ambitions.
Are any currently being maintained at public expense?
__________________
Helping people escape from Rovvrum since 1991.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links - Register and/or Login to hide this ad.
Old 10-07-2008, 23:12   #20
I1L2T3
Registered User
 
I1L2T3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodseats
Total Posts: 1,213
Hopefully we'll have more of these in S Yorks. We live in one of the windiest areas in the country and have enough potential wind farm sits to supply a sizeable portion of off-peak demand. More please. But not in my back yard
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools



POSTS ON THIS FORUM ARE NOT ACTIVELY MONITORED
Click "Report Post" under any post which may breach our terms of use.

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29.


vBulletin Software from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. ©2000 - 2010
Copyright ©2002-2010 SheffieldForum.co.uk