PopT Â Â 10 #1 Posted March 31, 2009 I know there are several placenames in and the area that are thought to be of Viking origins. Â Does anyone know if there has ever been any evidence of Vikings living in this area apart from these place names? Â Have any artefacts or buildings been found and if so, where can you see them? Â PopT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
xenia   11 #2 Posted March 31, 2009 Michael Wood in both his book and TV series regarding the Dark Ages states that South Yorkshire was somewhat of a no mans land in those times with an ever changing overlordhip between the (largely) Viking north and the (largely) Saxon south.  Although one of, if not the, largest battle ever on English soil took place at, what is now, Tinsley marshalling yards there seems to be little evidence of serious military activity in those days compared to elsewhere in the country.  It may be therefore that the inhabitants were actually largely of celtic stock but with changing overlords either Viking or Anglo Saxon and they based some distance away.  Perhaps that is the reason there is little evidence of actual settlement by the invaders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Tradescanthia   10 #3 Posted March 31, 2009 I remember the Battle of Orgreave being quite fearsome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
grinder   10 #4 Posted April 1, 2009 (edited) Xenia. Sheffield seems to be an area that has no historical importance at all to Archaeologist or Historians.... They have only recently found out that Sheffield castle was much bigger than they thought, though I've heard the story that Queen Elizabeth was at Sheffield Castle when she received the news that the Spanish Armada had set sail so it must have been of some importance.. Manor castle is also of no importance to anyone other than local people... I mean did Mary queen of Scots ever actually stay here for any length of time ?. Once while in Scotland I spoke to a lady in charge of Marys section of the local museum and she didn't have the foggiest about her ever being in Sheffield. Plus we are only mentioned in passing if at all in any program about the lady... Edited April 1, 2009 by grinder Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
flyer   10 #5 Posted April 2, 2009 I think most of the Vikings are still there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Tradescanthia   10 #6 Posted April 2, 2009 I think most of the Vikings are still there  Raping and pillaging on the Manor no doubt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
carosio   186 #7 Posted April 2, 2009 I remember the Battle of Orgreave being quite fearsome. That was led by Ye old vi-King Arthur. Never knew that this area was influenced by the vikings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
grinder   10 #8 Posted April 2, 2009 Raping and pillaging on the Manor no doubt. Are you kidding!!!!!! The Vikings would be lucky to leave with a shirt on their backs.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Plain Talker   11 #9 Posted April 2, 2009 The names of Jordanthorpe and Hackenthorpe are of norse origin.  Thorpe is from the Norse "Torpa" meaning farmstead, Jordanthope meaning "Jorda's Thorpe" or Jorda's farmstead, Hackenthope being "Haakke's Thorpe" or Haakkes farmstead.  "Grim" or "Grime" as in Grimsby, or Grimes/ Grimethorpe (see? Grim's farmstead!!) and places ending in "by" (Saxilby, Whitby etc) again have Viking roots. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
angelwing   10 #10 Posted April 2, 2009 Most of us are descendants of the vikings Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
grinder   10 #11 Posted April 2, 2009 I believe names ending in ley, Heeley, Walkley.. also mean a clearing in the woods Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
grinder   10 #12 Posted April 2, 2009 (edited) From an Archaeological point of view you also have to remember that both the Saxons and the Vikings built mainly in wood, unlike the Romans and Normans which is why I should imagine most archaeological knowledge is of the Roman/ Norman times... Plus the fact that anything from that period was trashed by four hundred years of french occupation, even the English language almost died Edited April 3, 2009 by grinder Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...