Jump to content

Mobile phones in prison

Recommended Posts

Costs too much

 

You woul donly need to pay around £500 for a jammer to cover the prison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Isn't the thing about prison to take away your freedom?

 

 

Indeed it is, and that's why they are locked in. Everything else is trivial; the fact they can't get out is sufficient to prevent them being a threat to society.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
they are not prisons anymore they are holiday camps ---sex drugs phones who do u blame ---i blame the wardens

 

Do you really think that? Or are you attempting to provoke a reaction by airing ill informed views - How exactly are Officers to blame then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know why they don't just jam the signal in the prison area - problem sorted. :thumbsup:

You woul donly need to pay around £500 for a jammer to cover the prison.
Don't know how clued up about jammers you two are, but they're completely illegal to own/use unless authorised by the MoD (which happens extremely rarely, only at a given place, only for a given -short- duration).

 

I'd be you, I'd start watching out for the black helicopters ;):twisted:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't know how clued up about jammers you two are, but they're completely illegal to own/use unless authorised by the MoD (which happens extremely rarely, only at a given place, only for a given -short- duration).

 

I'd be you, I'd start watching out for the black helicopters ;):twisted:

 

 

I'm sure a prinson would be granted a license:

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/enforcement/jammers/ I'm also pretty sure its only illegal to operate not to own in the uk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sure a prinson would be granted a license.
Currently, it would not.

 

You may be right in relation to ownership, however I cannot for the life of me understand why a person would want to own a jammer, without ever being able to use it? (unless, of course, said person is a collector of jamming equipment :D)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Currently, it would not.

 

You may be right in relation to ownership, however I cannot for the life of me understand why a person would want to own a jammer, without ever being able to use it? (unless, of course, said person is a collector of jamming equipment :D)

 

 

I suppose they could always use this section instead:

Alternatives to jammers

It is understandable that the owners of theatres, cinemas, concert halls, restaurants, prisons etc may want to restrict the use of mobile phones within their premises but jamming is an inappropriate means of achieving this. The alternative, legal way to do this is by education and publicity in informing users to keep mobile phones switched off when requested to do so. This may be assisted by the use of cellphone detectors at entrances that, without transmitting any interfering signal, give visible and/or audible warnings if an active device is nearby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Indeed it is, and that's why they are locked in. Everything else is trivial; the fact they can't get out is sufficient to prevent them being a threat to society.

 

But surely for any "gang" leaders, being able to update Facebook and use their mobiles means they are still in contact with their "homies", therefore prison is less than useless?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is understandable that ... people ... may want to restrict the use of mobile phones within their premises but jamming is an inappropriate means of achieving this. The alternative, legal way to do this is by education and publicity in informing users to keep mobile phones switched off when requested to do so.

 

What this article fails to point out is that, while it's an alternative way to do it, and a legal way to do it, it isn't a successful one. It doesn't work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But surely for any "gang" leaders, being able to update Facebook and use their mobiles means they are still in contact with their "homies", therefore prison is less than useless?

 

:hihi: You do realise you sound like Alan Partridge :hihi:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's quite bad that not only are they able to get mobile phones in to the prison, but the charger to go with it.

 

I've heard of someone who uses Facebook on their phone in prison. Making status updates about their daily prison.

 

Something like;

 

HY M8Z HD BRKFST THS MORN THN EMPTD SHT BCKT. THN LY ON BD 4 10 OAZ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's quite bad that not only are they able to get mobile phones in to the prison, but the charger to go with it.

 

I've heard of someone who uses Facebook on their phone in prison. Making status updates about their daily prison.

 

Knuckels Mckenzie is slopping out. (3 people like this)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.