Evidence Bombs were planted beneath trains on 7/7

Sorry, you are completely untrustworthy.

 

Here is what Bridget actually said from the link that you provided:-

 

As the timings on the CCTV shown today hadn't been pixellated ,

 

28/6

 

08.10.07 Enter Luton

08.14.26 Go through barriers

08.15.07 Enter platform

 

7/7

 

07.21.54 Enter Luton

07.22.29 Ticket hall

07.22.43 Go through barriers

07.23.27 On platform

07.24.47 Train arrives

07.24.56 Board

07.25.36 Train leaves

 

Presumably you can move in less than half the time when carrying bomb-laden rucksacks!

 

So on the dry run when they'd been researching- barriers to platform 41 seconds.

7/7 - barriers to platform 44 seconds - rucksacks don't make that much difference when you're young and fit (unless they weigh about 60lbs).

Rest of the time easily accounted for by buying tickets on the dry run after entering the station but Aylesbury lad buying them before others arrived on 7/7.

"Barriers" are automatic and take seconds with a ticket.

http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/sjp/LUT/plan.html?rtnloc=LUT

The quotes from Bruce Lait are from the 25 July 2005 edition of the Cambridge Evening News:-

 

http://prisonplanet.com/Pages/Jul05/250705under.html

Yes - seen it before Rob - Bruce Lait does not say "we were nearest the bomb".

He wasn't nearest the bomb was he?

http://7julyinquests.independent.gov.uk/evidence/docs/INQ10280-8.pdf

Right Rob - off to bed now - one in the morning here in Sheffield - keep searching for Bruce Lait saying "we were nearest the bomb".

Clue - he didn't - made up by a "truther".

I'm saying exactly what I've been saying for the last few days.

 

CCTV isn't very good at identifying individuals.

 

It plays very little part in detecting crime.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ce-admits.html

 

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/a...me-unsolved.do

 

http://www.info4security.com/story.a...rycode=4115263

What are the links supposed to back up ?

Right Rob - off to bed now - one in the morning here in Sheffield - keep searching for Bruce Lait saying "we were nearest the bomb".

 

Clue - he didn't - made up by a "truther".

Hey Lang what ever happened to the second wave of bombers ?

Yes they were caught on tape some how !?

Hey Lang what ever happened to the second wave of bombers ?

 

Yes they were caught on tape some how !?

Why are you persisting in mis-spelling and mangling peoples usernames? It's very bad manners.

So on the dry run when they'd been researching- barriers to platform 41 seconds.

 

7/7 - barriers to platform 44 seconds - rucksacks don't make that much difference when you're young and fit (unless they weigh about 60lbs).

 

Rest of the time easily accounted for by buying tickets on the dry run after entering the station but Aylesbury lad buying them before others arrived on 7/7.

 

"Barriers" are automatic and take seconds with a ticket.

 

http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/sjp/LUT/plan.html?rtnloc=LUT

No evidence. Just your opinion. Business as usual.

Nobody believes you.

Yes - seen it before Rob - Bruce Lait does not say "we were nearest the bomb".

 

He wasn't nearest the bomb was he?

 

http://7julyinquests.independent.gov.uk/evidence/docs/INQ10280-8.pdf

from http://www.rense.com/general67/camb.htm, Bruce Lait is quoted as saying...

Reflecting on the ordeal, he said: ."Out of that whole carriage, I think Crystal and I were the only ones who were not seriously injured, and I think we were nearest the bomb

"It makes me thank Him up there. I'm not overly religious but I'm not a disbeliever. I pray now and again. Something like this has just made me think, 'thank you Lord'."

And more importantly Bruce Lait told us he didn't see any backpack/rucksack, Muslim or Muslim with/carrying a backpack/rucksack bomb on the carriage or near the blast location.

So what data exactly was the diagram you provided concocted from? Was there an SO15 agent on the carriage at the time of the explosion?

Bruce Lait, an actual witness who was on the carriage and received injuries from the blast says he didn't see any Muslims carrying backpack/rucksack, or any backpack/rucksack at the place where the explosion occurred, which left a hole in the floor of the carriage with metal pushed UPWARD. So what evidence is there that Tanweer was standing in the spot marked on the diagram you provided? NONE. What evidence is there that Tanweer was even on that carriage at all? Again the answer is: NONE.

Isn't it the least bit odd that his face was cut up by shattered window glass that should have been blown OUTWARD if the blast had really occurred from inside the carriage as we have been told?

So again you are trying to run your little smokescreen to cover up the truth and making up stories about what Bruce Lait actually said whilst accusing others of doing what you are ACTUALLY doing.

You have ZERO credibility.

No evidence. Just your opinion. Business as usual.

 

Nobody believes you.

Simple and irrefutable facts don't need evidence.

Simple and irrefutable facts don't need evidence.

Simple and irrefutable facts don't exist without evidence. It is the evidence that makes the facts irrefutable.

Simple and irrefutable facts don't need evidence.

Another classic one way sentence from the sf legend tony!

How can something be a fact without EVIDANCE ?

Please give me a example ,

The one good thing which did come out of these attacks was that the british were muted towards the sight of Iraqi steets flowing with blood!