Jump to content

MP service - like jury service only longer.

Should we have 650 random people for MPs rather than elected ones?  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we have 650 random people for MPs rather than elected ones?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      9


Recommended Posts

Trouble is with a jury type system, there'd be no consistency in the ideas department, 1 person would allow something then the next wouldn't like it

 

What you really need is the government working for the good of the country/citizens. What we actually have is people making up policies just to get into power even if they cannot be met, are actually not good for the populace as a whole, or are downright lies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As long as there is some pre-conditions. Don't want 650 stupid people running the country

 

Unlike now you mean? :hihi:

 

---------- Post added 22-05-2017 at 15:33 ----------

 

Trouble is with a jury type system, there'd be no consistency in the ideas department, 1 person would allow something then the next wouldn't like it

 

That's exactly the situation we have now, zig zagging between left and right. Labour get in and spend 4.5 years of their 5 dismantling the Tories policies, then spend 6 months campaigning just for the Tories to get in and spend 4.5 years putting it all back to where it was 5 years ago, and onwards we go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well it takes a lot longer than a year to get anything done.

 

A year is ample time for anyone appointed under this system to fulfil their manifesto promises.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unlike now you mean? :hihi:

 

---------- Post added 22-05-2017 at 15:33 ----------

 

 

That's exactly the situation we have now, zig zagging between left and right. Labour get in and spend 4.5 years of their 5 dismantling the Tories policies, then spend 6 months campaigning just for the Tories to get in and spend 4.5 years putting it all back to where it was 5 years ago, and onwards we go.

 

I think this will be most keenly felt in the area of the provision of long term care for the elderly where a measure of cross party cooperation would be useful.

I thought the Dilnot proposals were sensible, and ones which all parties could unite behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been touting this idea for a few years now. Put a few hundred thousand people in to the hat, who meet certain criteria and pull some out. Give them a year of training and let them get on with it. Rotate the crop and devolve as much as possible.

 

We currently have in the main, a bunch of self-serving millionaires, mostly from the legal profession, following an age-old tradition that needs putting out of its misery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's called Lottocracy if memory serves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.