Jerky   10 #205 Posted May 18, 2017 How are Sheffield fc getting on ? Or dont owls like them because Curtis Woodhouse is the gaffer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
rogets   141 #206 Posted May 18, 2017 Wednesday simply were not good enough, I saw the first leg and Huddersfield were the better team  If Huddersfield do go up, then I rekon it could be a record goals against, even higher than Rotherham Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ukdobby   224 #207 Posted May 18, 2017 How are Sheffield fc getting on ? Or dont owls like them because Curtis Woodhouse is the gaffer?  Isn't he a boxer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
stpetre   12 #208 Posted May 18, 2017 (edited) Wednesday simply were not good enough, I saw the first leg and Huddersfield were the better team If Huddersfield do go up, then I rekon it could be a record goals against, even higher than Rotherham  How do you work that out ? Rotherham had 98 goals against and Huddersfield 58.The Terriers bettered Reading tho', who let in 64. Edited May 18, 2017 by stpetre Add Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell   863 #209 Posted May 18, 2017 How are Sheffield fc getting on ? Or dont owls like them because Curtis Woodhouse is the gaffer?  this one?  oh no wait, thats walker Oo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
POUNDSWORTH Â Â 12 #210 Posted May 18, 2017 May i ask, Whats the general opinion on the multi million pound investment of Rhodes? do you want him to stay? Â Have the Owls , paid up for him yet or is there a possibility on avoiding payment? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell   863 #211 Posted May 18, 2017 May i ask, Whats the general opinion on the multi million pound investment of Rhodes? do you want him to stay? Have the Owls , paid up for him yet or is there a possibility on avoiding payment? i aint convinced, then i wasnt convinced with him at boro Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Hotmale 1954   201 #212 Posted May 18, 2017 (edited) I'll bet you're mightily relieved you lost aren't you ? Good result then  Not relieved, no. Obviously, I never like losing, especially against teams who I know we should wallop. If we went up, I'd have to get very used to losing. I'm not keen on being embarrassed. I'd rather win a few with good players on decent money, than get walloped with 'Prima Donnas' on Mega money 'playing' for my team. The Championship is a more competitive League, with more 'honest' endeavour and passion. I'm quite happy here, thanks. Edited May 18, 2017 by Hotmale 1954 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
NERVY-OWL   195 #213 Posted May 18, 2017 May i ask, Whats the general opinion on the multi million pound investment of Rhodes? do you want him to stay? Have the Owls , paid up for him yet or is there a possibility on avoiding payment?  I'm sure boro must have it in writing somewhere we have to sign him in the summer, abit foolish on their part if not. I still want him signed anyway, I said at the time Rhodes alone wasn't the answer, we needed creativity aswell. If we can get that right in the summer we have a 20 goal a season striker there then no one will question the price tag. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Vaati   11 #214 Posted May 19, 2017 As several of you still could not help yourselves after the warning that was left, closing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...