Titanic99   10 #1 Posted May 9, 2017 Whilst we are a few points and places better off I can't help thinking if everyone was fit none of our new signings would make the starting 11.  My play-off team would be  westwood Pudil Hunt Lees Loovens Bannan Hutchinson Wallace Lee Hooper forestieri  I find it odd that none of the new signings have done well enough to get into a first team (in my opinion) and I suspect we'd be playing the same team as last year.  Just wondering how many new signings get into your starting line up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell   862 #2 Posted May 9, 2017 Whilst we are a few points and places better off I can't help thinking if everyone was fit none of our new signings would make the starting 11. My play-off team would be  westwood Pudil Hunt Lees Loovens Bannan Hutchinson Wallace Lee Hooper forestieri  I find it odd that none of the new signings have done well enough to get into a first team (in my opinion) and I suspect we'd be playing the same team as last year.  Just wondering how many new signings get into your starting line up. no fletcher? hes been the one thats been on form more tbh, even if hoopers fit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
top4718   838 #3 Posted May 9, 2017 Whilst we are a few points and places better off I can't help thinking if everyone was fit none of our new signings would make the starting 11. My play-off team would be  westwood Pudil Hunt Lees Loovens Bannan Hutchinson Wallace Lee Hooper forestieri  I find it odd that none of the new signings have done well enough to get into a first team (in my opinion) and I suspect we'd be playing the same team as last year.  Just wondering how many new signings get into your starting line up.  It depends where your starting point is for a "new signing" FF is not fully fit, an in-form Rhodes would have to be in and Fletcher on current form. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Titanic99   10 #4 Posted May 9, 2017 no fletcher? hes been the one thats been on form more tbh, even if hoopers fit.  Personally I'd have Hooper out of the two if both fit to play with Fletcher on the bench!  ---------- Post added 09-05-2017 at 13:30 ----------  It depends where your starting point is for a "new signing" FF is not fully fit, an in-form Rhodes would have to be in and Fletcher on current form.  New singings would be this season and the likes of: Fox Jones Mcmannaman Rhodes Urby Winnall Fletcher Buckley Reach  There's also a few more from last season on the periphery and I'm surprised none of these have made the breakthrough to get a starting place (in my eyes others will disagree). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
top4718   838 #5 Posted May 9, 2017 Personally I'd have Hooper out of the two if both fit to play with Fletcher on the bench! ---------- Post added 09-05-2017 at 13:30 ----------   New singings would be this season and the likes of: Fox Jones Mcmannaman Rhodes Urby Winnall Fletcher Buckley Reach  There's also a few more from last season on the periphery and I'm surprised none of these have made the breakthrough to get a starting place (in my eyes others will disagree).  To be fair when we signed these players it was acknowleged that most were being bought as back (except Rhodes) to the core of the team that finished last season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
sheff66 Â Â 10 #6 Posted May 9, 2017 No Reach no Fletcher ? wow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
staninoodle   174 #7 Posted May 9, 2017 Same side that finished at Ipswich,they are playing well and have a winning habit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Titanic99   10 #8 Posted May 10, 2017 No Reach no Fletcher ? wow  Not sure who from last years team you'd drop for them.  FF is in my opinion far more effective than both and we've improved since Hooper came back so I wouldn't want him dropping. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Sheridan1-0   406 #9 Posted May 10, 2017 Not sure who from last years team you'd drop for them. FF is in my opinion far more effective than both and we've improved since Hooper came back so I wouldn't want him dropping.  Forestieri isn't fit enough to start games according to CC..  Fletcher is scoring goals and deserves a place....  Rhodes up against his old club...due a goal to compliment his grafting for the team...  Hooper unlikely to play in either of the Huddersfield games..  Who'd be a manager..? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
rogets   136 #10 Posted May 10, 2017 I suspect we'd be playing the same team as last year. .   We won't be playing same team as last year, Hull have already been promoted Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell   862 #11 Posted May 10, 2017 i seen what you did there  We won't be playing same team as last year, Hull have already been promoted Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
John_S6 Â Â 10 #12 Posted May 15, 2017 Fletcher's done alright recently, the partnership that I'd prefer would be Hooper and Rhodes but we haven't seen much of them together, they looked alright at QPR. Â Even if we went with the same lineup as last year, what we do have now is a much stronger bench - in last season's final we brought on Jeremy Helan to try and rescue the game! Now it could be Reach, Winnall, Rhodes, etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...