Ched Evans released by UTD - Page 3

TAT · 30-05-2012, 23:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by sibon

Easier isn't always better. This has damaged the reputation of SUFC, in many people's opinion.

Many people or just Owls?, no ones happy about the crime ,Cheds an idiot. but in many peoples eyes this is old news, chip paper wraping that 99% of the country have no thought on what so ever.

United have got rid, at little expence and 4 weeks after the initial conviction.

southcoast · 31-05-2012, 00:21

Lets hope ched wins his appeal,he did very well for our club and we should not forget that.

F. Sidebottom · 31-05-2012, 07:20

Well I'm going to ask this question again.

Does anyone know if Evans was still being paid, from the time of his conviction up to the end of his contract?

When does his contract expire?

rossyrooney · 31-05-2012, 08:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by F. Sidebottom

Well I'm going to ask this question again.

Does anyone know if Evans was still being paid, from the time of his conviction up to the end of his contract?

When does his contract expire?

How would anyone know Surely it would only be conjecture.?

missymoo73 · 31-05-2012, 09:16

TBH I just thought they were waiting for his appeal before making a decision.

FRANKIE

Only the people at United will know the answer to your question hun.

Billy Casper · 31-05-2012, 09:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by southcoast

Lets hope ched wins his appeal,he did very well for our club and we should not forget that.

Woh...Two very different things you've written here.

Yes, he did do very well for your club, but should that deem that you hope he wins his case because of it???

He is no longer an employee of Sheffield United so that can't now influence your feelings on the matter.
So the only reason must be that you presume him to be innocent?

TAT · 31-05-2012, 09:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by missymoo73

TBH I just thought they were waiting for his appeal before making a decision.

FRANKIE

Only the people at United will know the answer to your question hun.

i am sure the PFA would have had a say, its guess work i know, but it would be fair to say a fine of at least 2 weeks wages followed the judgement, leaving only a small possible balance. Would the PFA pay that to protect one of its members?

missymoo73 · 31-05-2012, 09:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by LADYBIRDS

i am sure the PFA would have had a say, its guess work i know, but it would be fair to say a fine of at least 2 weeks wages followed the judgement, leaving only a small possible balance. Would the PFA pay that to protect one of its members?

Your right its all guess work LB.....who knows. But he's gone and its time for us (United) to move on now (hope others can too) from the whole sorry business.

rossyrooney · 31-05-2012, 09:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Casper

Woh...Two very different things you've written here.

Yes, he did do very well for your club, but should that deem that you hope he wins his case because of it???

He is no longer an employee of Sheffield United so that can't now influence your feelings on the matter.
So the only reason must be that you presume him to be innocent?

Too true Billy.perhaps people are forgetting tho other person involved and the trauma she has suffered,it makes football pale into insignificance

rossyrooney · 31-05-2012, 09:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by missymoo73

Your right its all guess work LB.....who knows. But he's gone and its time for us (United) to move on now (hope others can too) from the whole sorry business.

It wont move on so long as people persist in trying to score childish points by regurgatating old news.

F. Sidebottom · 31-05-2012, 10:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by rossyrooney

How would anyone know Surely it would only be conjecture.?

Quote:

Originally Posted by missymoo73

TBH I just thought they were waiting for his appeal before making a decision.

FRANKIE

Only the people at United will know the answer to your question hun.

Wasn't sure if United had said one way or the other.

Personally I don't think united have done anything wrong in not sacking him if it was cheaper for the club to let his contract expire without paying for him.

But it would be bad form if he was still taking £x,000 a week out of your club while incapable of delivering the services defined in his contract.

missymoo73 · 31-05-2012, 11:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by F. Sidebottom

Wasn't sure if United had said one way or the other.

Personally I don't think united have done anything wrong in not sacking him if it was cheaper for the club to let his contract expire without paying for him.

But it would be bad form if he was still taking £x,000 a week out of your club while incapable of delivering the services defined in his contract.

I dont think they have either.

If he had any decency left about him then he wouldn't be drawing a wage but legally I think he would be entitled to ??

Bypassblade · 31-05-2012, 11:53

A lot of people are going under the assumption that United have been idiots in this sorry saga, trust me, they won't have been. They have well paid lawyers that advise them & will surely now acted on that advice, I don't, & you certainly don't know why they've not gone public.

There is nothing in our constitution that says they have to, other players have gone to chucky & the clubs have just finished them without condemnation.

In this stupid day & age it could probably leave them, open to hurting someone's feelings & getting sued for compensation. He's done the crime (heinous one IMO), he's doing the time, all links with Sheffield United SEVERED, hopefully that will register.

missymoo73 · 31-05-2012, 11:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bypassblade

A lot of people are going under the assumption that United have been idiots in this sorry saga, trust me, they won't have been. They have well paid lawyers that advise them & will surely now acted on that advice, I don't, & you certainly don't know why they've not gone public.

There is nothing in our constitution that says they have to, other players have gone to chucky & the clubs have just finished them without condemnation.

In this stupid day & age it could probably leave them, open to hurting someone's feelings & getting sued for compensation. He's done the crime (heinous one IMO), he's doing the time, all links with Sheffield United SEVERED, hopefully that will register.

Excellent post Bypass

Grappler · 31-05-2012, 13:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bypassblade

A lot of people are going under the assumption that United have been idiots in this sorry saga, trust me, they won't have been. They have well paid lawyers that advise them & will surely now acted on that advice, I don't, & you certainly don't know why they've not gone public.

There is nothing in our constitution that says they have to, other players have gone to chucky & the clubs have just finished them without condemnation.

In this stupid day & age it could probably leave them, open to hurting someone's feelings & getting sued for compensation. He's done the crime (heinous one IMO), he's doing the time, all links with Sheffield United SEVERED, hopefully that will register.

Agreed mate, in this namby pamby age of Human Rights, you never know what can happen, I am sure, as you say, that SUFC's lawyers have advised on what is the right thing to do under the circumstances.

DerbyTup · 31-05-2012, 14:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigTeeOwls

He was released fella, it was broadcast on Look North that Evans was sacked, but his contract was to expire this week anyway... Bad wording from Luk Leeds, and for that reason i will give you the benefit of the thread......

"Sacked" means his contract was terminated before its expiry date by his employers.

He may well have been "sacked" resulting in his "release".

It depends when the expiry date was and whether the club terminated the contract in advance of that date.

web1 · 01-06-2012, 00:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bypassblade

A lot of people are going under the assumption that United have been idiots in this sorry saga, trust me, they won't have been. They have well paid lawyers that advise them & will surely now acted on that advice, I don't, & you certainly don't know why they've not gone public.

There is nothing in our constitution that says they have to, other players have gone to chucky & the clubs have just finished them without condemnation.

In this stupid day & age it could probably leave them, open to hurting someone's feelings & getting sued for compensation. He's done the crime (heinous one IMO), he's doing the time, all links with Sheffield United SEVERED, hopefully that will register.

Fantastic post...
Well said that man.