Jump to content


Jobless total hits 7 year low as Tories announce 2 million new jobs.

Recommended Posts

Unemployment hits a 7 year low as Tories announce 2 million new jobs created since 2010.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-32348353

 

UK unemployment has fallen to its lowest rate since July 2008, official figures have shown.

 

The number of jobless people dropped by 76,000 to 1.84 million in the three months to February, the Office for National Statistics said on Friday.

 

That means the unemployment rate has fallen to 5.6%, in line with forecasts.

 

Average weekly earnings in the three months to February, excluding bonuses, rose by 1.8% compared with the same period a year earlier.

 

I also note the IMF has praised the handling of the UK economy as it continues to out perform the rest of the EU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fine, providing you can live on two hours a week zero hour contracts which if offered by the job centre, you are forced to take otherwise you lose your benefits. What a stitch-up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Make fracking a go go and unemployment would be zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fine, providing you can live on two hours a week zero hour contracts which if offered by the job centre, you are forced to take otherwise you lose your benefits. What a stitch-up.

 

Proof please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Proof please.

 

Provide proof to the contrary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Provide proof to the contrary

 

I'm not claiming the contrary - I'm only asking the person making the claim to prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fine, providing you can live on two hours a week zero hour contracts which if offered by the job centre, you are forced to take otherwise you lose your benefits. What a stitch-up.

 

Im sorry but you are wrong. You are only taken off your benefits if you work more than 16 hours a week, but don't let the facts get in the way of a ignorant rant.

 

---------- Post added 17-04-2015 at 16:23 ----------

 

Provide proof to the contrary

 

Don't get sucked into poppet2's lack of knowledge.

 

Have a read: https://www.gov.uk/jobseekers-allowance/eligibility

 

3. Eligibility

To get Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) you must:

 

be 18 or over but below State Pension age - there are some exceptions if you’re 16 or 17

not be in full-time education

be in England, Scotland or Wales

be available for work

be actively seeking work

work on average less than 16 hours per week

Edited by Berberis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the news is so great, and you cant deny the headline figures tell a good story, then why aren't the Tory party soaring in the polls by now?

 

They should really be up past 40% and heading for a decent majority by now. Maybe they are and its 1992 all over again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Im sorry but you are wrong. You are only taken off your benefits if you work more than 16 hours a week.

 

And only 1 job in 45 in the UK is on a zero hour contract anyhow. So those working short hours is virtually zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fine, providing you can live on two hours a week zero hour contracts which if offered by the job centre, you are forced to take otherwise you lose your benefits. What a stitch-up.

 

There are 700,000 people on zero hours contracts about 350,000 prefer to be on such contracts, a further 17% of the total are students working in catering, stewarding type jobs, there are about 250,000 on these contracts that would prefer an alternative.

 

Out of a total workforce of 30 million this is a tiny proportion.

 

(Figures from Daily Politics)

 

---------- Post added 17-04-2015 at 16:31 ----------

 

If the news is so great, and you cant deny the headline figures tell a good story, then why aren't the Tory party soaring in the polls by now?

 

They should really be up past 40% and heading for a decent majority by now. Maybe they are and its 1992 all over again.

 

Its a very good question,I feel that there is still some hangover from the Thatcher era,with many thinking that Cameron is similar.

 

In fact Cameron has more in common with Macmillan and the "one nation" Tory than the divisive Thatcher.

 

It could well be a 1992 moment, I hope it is because I do not relish a Labour SNP coalition which will not feature the SNP leader but will feature Alex Salmon. A nightmare scenario if ever there was one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Add the 700k on ZHC and those on suspended benefits to 1.8m and things are no better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Add the 700k on ZHC and those on suspended benefits to 1.8m and things are no better

 

"The poor are always with us" as the philosopher said.

 

Things are much better, think back to 2010, think whats been achieved since in only 5 years.

 

Dont lets exchange lists, its better, period. And if the country keeps its nerve, votes Cameron back in, those who you are so concerned about can prosper, but only if we have an economy strong enough to afford to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.