Sheffield Forum
Your message here

Does anyone know anything about UK Park control Ltd (UKPC)
Home > General Forums > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25-04-2012, 18:36   #21
suzyoo
Registered User
 
suzyoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: S35
Total Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by sorbster0 View Post
Suzyoo, tell me who can park in the retail park then......is it Mcdonalds car park or was I just outside Mcdonalds restaurant in the retail park

I don't think you are making sense......the pay and display is for visitors using other attractrions.

I WAS using facilities in the retail park and paying for them
you obviously overstayed your welcome
__________________
Take what you want, and pay for it.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links - Register and/or Login to hide this ad.
Old 25-04-2012, 18:38   #22
linda-lisa
Registered User
 
linda-lisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: sheffield
Total Posts: 12
Im sure this was on watch dog recently.........i wouldnt pay it....thats me being me lol........i think its discusting and dam rite cheeky
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2012, 19:01   #23
Walkley Dave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Walkley
Total Posts: 500
Your £75.00 is made up of £50.00 for a speculative invoice - disguised as a fine, and a charge for paying for that made by the car hire company that they have paid on your behalf - and shouldn't have done.

When you hired the car you will have used a credit card and the money will have been taken from that card. Therefore should you choose to listen to the people telling you to ignore you will be £75.00 short!

Start with taking a look at the the terms and conditions of hire that you signed. This will have a clause in it about passing on any fines and penalties you are charged. This is neither, but simply a speculative invoice disguised as a fine for £50.00.

The way to deal with it therefore is to write to the car hire company and ask them for it back. Of course include the £25.00 admin cost.

Of course they will not dream of sending it and offer all sorts of excuses.

This person got his money back in exactly the same circumstances and I suggest you use their letter to SIXT as a template to do the same. (The final letter that produced a result that is!) Note he got his money back and there is no reason why you should not do the same. Show them that they were wrong to accept the speculative invoice as a fine (and wrong to pay it). What they should have done is send it to you and tell UKPC that they had done so.

They are NOT entitled to pass on your name and address, which they have done - against the provisions of the Data Protection Act.


http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=62531
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2012, 19:15   #24
Walkley Dave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Walkley
Total Posts: 500
Incidentally UKPC have never been known to go to court.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2012, 20:37   #25
sorbster0
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Total Posts: 59
Thanks Walkley Dave for your advice.

Very good of you to help as I'm worried sick....but I suppose that is what they want!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2012, 22:55   #26
Walkley Dave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Walkley
Total Posts: 500
No worries. All I ask is you keep us up to date. Send me a Private message with a draft of your letter if you like. But base it on the link I sent you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 12:46   #27
alchresearch
Registered User
 
alchresearch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wirral (was Woodhouse)
Total Posts: 22,201
Send a message via Yahoo to alchresearch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nimrod View Post
There is something wrong with a legal system which allows the attempted scamming of law abiding people.
Law abiding people who can't see signs or read them. Most drivers get through the day without falling foul or getting harassed this way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 13:00   #28
sedith
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anchorage
Total Posts: 2,499
Just say you weren't driving the vehicle ... you have no legal responsibility to divulge who was driving. The invoice is to the driver of the vehicle not the registered keeper!
Or you could just 'return to sender' not at this address.
Or better still, bin it!
__________________
The Devil made me do it!
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2012, 22:21   #29
Walkley Dave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Walkley
Total Posts: 500
Quote:
Just say you weren't driving the vehicle ... you have no legal responsibility to divulge who was driving. The invoice is to the driver of the vehicle not the registered keeper!
Or you could just 'return to sender' not at this address.
Or better still, bin it!
Very, very respectfully this is not good advice.

Lying in court = not good advice.
Return to sender = not good advice.
Bin it = not good advice.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42.
POSTS ON THIS FORUM ARE NOT ACTIVELY MONITORED
Click "Report Post" under any post which may breach our terms of use.
©2002-2012 SheffieldForum.co.uk | Powered by vBulletin ©2013