Jump to content

pem123

Closed
  • Content Count

    3,346
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Neutral

About pem123

  • Rank
    Account Closed
  1. I think it's a bit of a combination of the two. I don't think it's serious
  2. In fairness, the dog's probably never been stupid enough to bang on about the evil of a usually benign, yet very profitable offence, then get busted doing it worse than most of those she's nailed for it.
  3. Then you'd be a bloody idiot for leaving young kids and dogs together. I don't know if you're simply playing devil's advocate, but that's the circumstance that usually transpires when dog attacks have occured. A bit more evidence for the deed versus breed arguement methinks. Dogs don't simply turn, except due to very rare mental issues. Attacks occur because somone or something has provoked or frightened them.
  4. People generally hate paedos because they see them as a threat to kids. It's hardly a reason that can be applied to how we view the actions of consenting adults.
  5. By 'dangerous dogs' do you mean individual dogs with a history of unprovoked aggression or breeds that pop up in the tabloids from time to time as 'devil dogs'? Really? You wouldn't consider the circumstances carefully? Ask why she bit? Frightened, stung by a wasp perhaps? Ask the vet to check her for brain tumours etc?
  6. Changing the subject a bit, this poor guy David Calvert, who had been 'outed' as Venables turns out to be nothing to do with him. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1256533/Jon-Venables-Terror-young-father-accused-Bulger-killer-Facebook.html Evidence of the terrifying stupidity of Facebook vigilante mentality if ever it was needed....
  7. I favour the model of more emphasis on punishing those who let it happen. You can't really stop dogs from being territorial 100% although you can do a lot to lessen the risks. Again it depends. If 10000 adults and dogs crossed each other's paths and there were 5000 attacks, i'd back you 100% If the figure were in the hundreds of millions (as it is), i'd suggest some perspective. You said the majority were adults entering the dogs' homes Exactly. It's all about (wrong) perception of the risk
  8. Well they aren't in public then are they? And by entering the dog's home, they've 'provoked' the dog, in the dog's mind. That's the fault of an irresponsible dog owner perhaps, that the dog was able to get at postie, but pretty understandable that a dog will protect it's territory. I suppose it depends on how you define 'many'. I think it's a miniscule number of human/dog interactions. We only see the ones where it could have been one of a few breeds. We never seem to hear any follow up stories, inquest/enquiry reports etc. Why? Oh yes. Dangerous Collies and Spaniels shouldn't be treated any differently to dangerous Bull breeds etc
  9. 1) IMO, Puegeots and Citroens are ok-ish (mostly the same bits). Renaults are cack 2) No. They were about 20 years ago 3) Fiesta or Polo
  10. No it couldn't. The DD act is flawed. It only prohibits 4 breeds which were judged to be dangerous back in 1991. There are many more ways to skin a cat should people wish.
  11. See my last sentance. The public perception of the danger of dog attacks is hugely disproportionate to the reality. It's an easy vote-winner
  12. Good idea. But whether it's worth the money it would cost, is what would need to be debated next. The risk to humans from dogs is miniscule. The money would be far better spent on improving road safety or obesity. But when's that general election again?....
  13. No, I'll think you find most happen within the family unit Dogs approaching people, uninvited, in public and attacking for what seems like no reason, happens very rarely. And even so, there are plenty that fulfil my analogy, the two deaths fron hybrid Bull Terriers in Liverpool, the baby and the Rottweiler in Wakefield.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.