Jump to content

Axel

Members
  • Content Count

    113
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

22 Neutral

About Axel

  • Rank
    Registered User

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You were right, it's all political, "not a shred of science.".. "A political decision from external forces"...
  2. So do I Jim. But I fear big pharma has form. Didnt AstraZeneca change the name of their vaccine because of blood clots, also apparently there's a case going through court at the moment: AstraZeneca in £80m Covid jab compensation claim set to be one of biggest battles of its kind https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/20/covid-compensation-high-court-claims-millions-of-pounds/
  3. I see what you did there. Great deflection tactics... The post was about the freedom to choose and the right to hear both sides of the story, and not the mass control of perception and manipulation of thought by using programmes like The Trusted News Initiative.... the people have a right to hear both sides so that we can form our own opinions, whether we agree with the GBD or not. Its as simple as that...
  4. These people are Scientists and Doctors, not politicians and have nothing to hide. If you read the information on their website....."How did the Great Barrington Declaration Come About?" It clearly states in their info section The Declaration was written and signed at the American Institute for Economic Research, located in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. The Institute kindly offered to help with the video recording, providing a location, equipment and a camera man pro bono. Jay Bhattacharya later learned that private correspondence between Fauci and Collins had maligned the three authors as "fringe epidemiologists" and had committed to orchestrating a devastating published takedown of their views.... Who initiated the Declaration? Dr Kulldorff invited Dr Bhattacharya and Dr Gupta to Massachusetts to record a video outlining an alternative to the current COVID-19 strategy. While meeting, the three spontaneously decided to also write a short Declaration to summarize the thinking. Why was the Declaration signed in Great Barrington? The Declaration was written and signed at the American Institute for Economic Research, located in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. The Institute kindly offered to help with the video recording, providing a location, equipment and a camera man pro bono. How were the co-signers selected? After finishing the Declaration, the three authors emailed a few colleagues asking them if they would co-sign. Most agreed. These original 30+ co-signers are listed on the front page, together with others that were added later. Can anyone sign the Declaration? Yes. Through the online form. Are all the online signatures real? No. Some pranksters added fake signatures such as Dr. Johnny Bananas, Prof. Spon’Ge’Bob SQ.UarePants, Dr. Neal Ferguson, Prof. Ware Thamask, and Dr. Person Fakename. In a strange twist, one journalist bragged on Twitter about adding fake names, after which other journalists criticized the Declaration for having fake signatures. Anyhow, the fake signatures are less than 1% of the total, and most have been removed from the count tracker.
  5. Your missing the point Pretty...... Its all about the censorship of three scientists... Scientists and Doctors were censored and silenced denying millions who wanted to hear the other perspective. The TNI guaranteed that ...no pesky minions to ask questions about lockdowns, suicides, damage to childrens education, damage to small businesses, etc. .... As Jay Battacharya (professor of medicine, economics, and health research policy at Stanford University) and one of the Great Barrington Declaration authors said at the beginning..." It was the working class that primarily suffered" "Embattled Stanford Professor of Medicine Jay Bhattacharya: ‘Academic freedom is dead’ " “When you take a position that is at odds with the scientific clerisy, your life becomes a living hell,” Bhattacharya said Saturday at an Academic Freedom Conference hosted at the Stanford Graduate School of Business. “You face a deeply hostile work environment.”
  6. Unfortunately we live in a time when our government deems it necessary to silence or censor certain people. Why is that? Check out the Trusted News Initiative, most media, or maybe all, signed up to this because the government wanted them all singing from the same hymn sheet. Why is that? Trusted News Initiative, explained, short 3 min video.... It became clear during the pandemic that certain scientists were censored and silenced, check out the Great Barrington Declaration, it was signed by Doctors, Scientists and members of the public because they wanted to hear an alternative voice, not one spouted continuously by the media.
  7. Watched a good debate last night about convicted pedophile Epstein on Piers Morgan uncensored. Epstein's former lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, and physicist and podcaster, Eric Weinstein along with Vicky Ward, investigative journalist.
  8. I really feel for the civilians in all this on both sides, how does the saying go..." The first casualty of war is the truth"
  9. It really was a stupid thing to say. Just showing her smirking face would have been enough.... I watched the piece. It was about male suicide, "The smirking face of disdain."
  10. Ok... I see that it's a different nanotech.. apparently a lipid nano particle, cell delivery system.
  11. Hi Padders, Apparently it does still exist, I was hoping that someone could give me a quick lesson on how it's involved in the Covid Vaccine and what it does, I found some info here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997390/ The Role of Nanotechnology behind the success of the mRNA vaccines for Covid 19...but Im afraid its all very technical.. Is it the same nanotech?
  12. Yes.........Unfortunately, it's a lose lose situation, I wonder if the young person can afford to go to the Priory ? The mental health issues of the presenter were known by the bbc, if he's so fragile, why is he fronting BBC News ?
  13. I believe the mother feels sick because she saw the pic of Huw Edwards bare backside.....
  14. This is true. All it achieves is that the Two Party Illusion continues as Im sure both parties accept that an ever increasing state helps them achieve their goals and the wishes of the voters mean nothing. The winners in all this are the funders of both parties.. banks, business, etc. who get to determine much of what becomes policy. As someone once said " Voting is deciding which criminal gets to steal everything you have"
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.