redruby

Maybe that would help. Some have a strong taste of doner kebab which is probably recycled fat.

Imran’s on the Wicker is recommended for diner kebabs https://www.thestar.co.uk/lifestyle/food-and-drink/9-of-the-best-places-to-grab-a-kebab-in-sheffield-including-envers-and-zeugma-4093104 Imran's on The Wicker serves fast food, kebabs and other lunchtime and dinner meals. Rated 4 out of 5 on Tripadvisor, one review said: "We stayed in Sheffield for 3 days and we had our dinner there everyday . Food is amazing and freshly made . Much better than any fast food restaurant. Imran’s has food freshly made every morning

Well I have heard that a lot of takeaways re-use their oil several times to save costs so that could be it.

Don’t some of these takeaways use the fat from the doner meat for frying the fish and chips? So it all tastes like doner kebab.

‘No great mind has ever existed without a touch of madness’. Aristotle.

It is worth reading more of Dr Coleman’s observations to gain a deeper understanding of his insights before making assumptions. This is an insightful read: A Doctor’s Challenge to the BMA By Dr Vernon Coleman ‘I recently received a copy of a statement made by Mr Philip Banfield, an obstetrician, who is the BMA UK Council Chair and who spoke at the official covid inquiry. Banfield said: `Speaking in my capacity as BMA chair of council, I was acutely aware of the responsibility I held not only of speaking on behalf of its association and all its members, but for every single doctor working in our health service and the millions of patients they care for.’ I didn’t know whether to cry, scream or punch the wall when I read that. The arrogance! Banfield was not speaking for all doctors. And he certainly was not speaking for patients. The BMA has been the patients’ enemy for years, and never more than it is now. BMA strikes are causing untold damage to endless numbers of patients. Not surprisingly, hospital and GP patients are increasingly dissatisfied with the care they receive. For Banfield to claim that he was speaking for patients is simply extraordinary and shows a level of disconnect that is deeply worrying. If BMA members had the guts to strike for better health care, for an end to working practices which have led to the longest waiting times in history or for the end of the General Medical Council’s absurd disciplinary process which punishes doctors who dare to ask questions or share truths, then I would not approve of their methods (doctors are never entitled to withdraw their labour by going on strike) but I would approve of their motives. But BMA members are striking for more money. Consultants on an average salary of £128,000 (plus pension) are striking for a 35% pay rise. That’s an extra £45,000 a year. They must know they cannot possible receive such a pay rise. If they did they would destroy what is left of the National Health Service and they would help push inflation still higher. The doctors’ strikes are official BMA strikes. Far from caring for patients the BMA appears be using them as a weapon, boasting recently that one in six people will soon be on waiting lists if doctors don’t receive the 35% pay rise they are demanding. It is the BMA which has, in my view, helped destroy health care in the UK. It was the decision of GPs not to work nights or weekends which destroyed hospitals and the ambulance service. And today the average GP works around three days a week. Librarians and accountants work longer hours than GPs. Does the BMA want to destroy health care in Britain? Or does it want to destroy Britain? I’m pretty sure it’s the latter. It seems to me that the BMA is helping to take us into a world of 15 minute cities, digitalisation, mass vaccination programmes and the Great Reset. It was, I remember, the BMA which said that climate change should be a new priority for doctors. It seems to concern them not at all that climate change is just a myth – and a myth, like covid and vaccination which must never, ever be debated. Banfield of the BMA went on to discuss covid-19 as though it were a real pandemic. Does he really not know that the evidence proves that covid-19 was no more than the rebranded flu? Does he really not know that doctors and hospitals and bureaucrats and politicians killed more people than covid-19? Does he not know that all scientific debate was crushed by the medical establishment? Does he not know that the covid-19 `vaccine’ does not do what it is supposed to do and is so toxic that it should not have been given to one patient – let alone billions? If he doesn’t know these things it may be because the medical establishment of which he is a part has crushed all debate and helped silence those telling the truth. Once again I issue my now well-worn challenge. I challenge Mr Banfield to debate his so-called pandemic, live on national television. I will prove to him that everything the medical establishment did made things worse. Those BMA members who followed the official party line and who wore masks and gave covid jabs were behaving like ignorant fools. They were the problem – not the solution. They should be ashamed. But Mr Banfield won’t accept my challenge, of course. Even if he wanted to he wouldn’t be allowed to risk it. The establishment dare not risk allowing the truth to be broadcast on mainstream media. And they know that I’d chew up Mr Banfield and spit him out in bits because I have the truth on my side. I can prove very quickly that if one of us is speaking on behalf of patients it isn’t him. Note: Vernon Coleman’s small book `The NHS: What’s Wrong and How to put it Right’ is available on Amazon.’

Dr Vernon Coleman has made many interesting observations on COVID-19. He had written a book called ‘Exposing Lies’ which contains transcripts of all Dr Coleman's videos made between January 2021 and May 2021, together with articles from The Light paper. Dr. Coleman demonstrates that the COVID-19 jabs are extremely deadly, lockdowns killed 91,000 people in the UK in 2020, and he exposes the horrors of a social credit system that Klaus Schwab and the cabal are busy rolling out. Additionally, Dr. Coleman offers startling facts about COVID-19, the flu, and he proves that the PCR test is useless.

Alcohol hasn’t been banned, it’s only smoking being banned for young people born after a certain date. This thread ought to be re-titled really. Some people are comparing alcohol to tobacco but the usage of these products is very different as mentioned in previous posts.

It has been really useful. It’s not a section that people will post on constantly of course but it has a lot of valuable information. So I’m pleased it’s still there as I believe there were plans to remove it. I don’t think hiding it away was a good move though. Until I saw this thread, I thought it had been removed.

They tend not to have do much problem end in Mediterranean countries don’t they? I believe that’s at least partly due to culture and having a more relaxed attitude to drinking. Banning and restricting drinking doesn’t tend to end well. I’m sorry if I offended you regarding the smoking comments. They were not directed at you personally or indeed all smokers. Unfortunately though, there ARE still a lot of anti social smokers (and increasingly vapers) around. Those of us who don’t smoke and vape often have to breathe these fumes in on a daily basis whether we like it or not. Excess drinking is a problem but it tends to be at night and around bars and clubs. Unlike smoking. A lot of smokers and vapers still think it’s perfectly fine to stand at bus stop and blow their fumes around other people. Or lurk in a doorway to a building smoking so other people have no choice but to walk past. Of course I know traffic fumes and other pollution are also a problem but that doesn’t make smoking and vaping around people OK. I also know that excess drinking is harmful but that doesn’t make smoking OK either. Alcoholics may drink at a bus at 7am but the vast majority of normal drinkers do not. Smokers positively enjoy that morning cigarette though and some just don’t care about others passive smoking as a result.

The world would certainly be a better place if all people put the welfare of animals (and other humans of course) above worshipping divine entities and following the rules they apparently want us humans to obey.

Thank you for clarifying this. In that case I think people that don’t believe in divine entities should be clearly informed if meat is Halal or Shechita so they can choose not to eat it if they wish to put the welfare of real, living animals over divine entities.

I don’t believe I did say I’d want to eat it myself and my personal view is that the ritual is based on nonsense. But why is it worse to Halal slaughter an animal? I’ve heard differing views on this regarding animal welfare. I would say if anyone is that concerned about animal slaughter they might do better to become vegetarian.

They are very different. Where they can get away with it smokers lurk in doorways, bus stops etc and puff their fumes at passers by. Some still walk around in busy areas blowing their fumes around for passers by to breathe in. In days gone by a large percentage of people smoked. Even if you didn’t smoke you couldn’t avoid it. It was on public transport and in workplaces . Drinking certainly can have negative consequences for passers by if someone is completely drunk and aggressive but most of us are capable of drinking socially without getting into a complete state.

Yes and can I dictate to the school exactly what I want for my child and never mind everyone else etc