scoobydotcom
05-08-2009, 21:44
Something I have read on a site I read very often and is as reliable as any out there
|
View Full Version : Spurs In for Beevers scoobydotcom 05-08-2009, 21:44 Something I have read on a site I read very often and is as reliable as any out there scoobydotcom 05-08-2009, 21:48 This is the link to the story http://www.sheffwed.vitalfootball.co.uk/article.asp?a=164612 ... £2m has to be rejected and will be IF there is a bid made, we rejected an offer of roughly the same for Tuggy and he had 1yr left so no way we're going to accept this! as of now tho it's all if's and but's Panthera 05-08-2009, 21:54 harry redknapp can f**k right off, the plastic faced mofo, i dont think wednesday would fight to kreep tudders then let beevers go(hopefully) Panthera 05-08-2009, 21:56 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1204597/Spurs-boss-Harry-Redknapp-gets-teenage-kicks-2m-bid-Sheffield-Wednesday-defender-Mark-Beevers.html?ITO=1490 MR BENN 05-08-2009, 21:56 they need to at least double that ,then some before we should even entertain a bid . Although on talksport tonight ,the leading football agent Phil Smith was on the Danny Kelly show and he said Redknapp was working on a couple of deals and something may happen soon scoobydotcom 05-08-2009, 21:57 his contract is until 2012, i dont think we're in danger of selling him unless we get an offer similair to one of the kyle's (estimate about £4.5-£5m?) and i doubt they'll offer that Higgs Boson 05-08-2009, 21:58 Christ, if that was our player, Fat Turry would be steaming past Watford Gap services with him at this very minute to make sure he was in Harry's office, pen in hand for 9am... scoobydotcom 05-08-2009, 21:59 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1204597/Spurs-boss-Harry-Redknapp-gets-teenage-kicks-2m-bid-Sheffield-Wednesday-defender-Mark-Beevers.html?ITO=1490 "Brian Laws is demanding £3m for 19-year-old Beevers" i'd love to know where they got that from! scoobydotcom 05-08-2009, 22:00 Fat Turry whom?!?!?! Higgs Boson 05-08-2009, 22:05 whom?!?!?! Terry Robinson - Head Cocker-Upper at the Lane. He's known as 'Turry' cos of his Lancashire accent scoobydotcom 05-08-2009, 22:09 Terry Robinson - Head Cocker-Upper at the Lane. He's known as 'Turry' cos of his Lancashire accent ahh, didnt he go to your Turkish team a while back? scoobydotcom 05-08-2009, 22:13 Im sure we'll see/hear something tomorrow if this is true Dimitri 11 05-08-2009, 22:15 harry redknapp can f**k right off, the plastic faced mofo, i dont think wednesday would fight to kreep tudders then let beevers go(hopefully) I always thought that Redknapp was an ugly mofo too but it turns out it was due to a major accident. Anyway i'd rather stare at his face than listen to the garbage his son spouts while attempting to impersonate a football pundit. £2 million for Beevers.......United would have snatched Redknapp's hand off... and his arm...... and one side of his mashed up face. If Wednesday have any sense they will hold off for a bigger fee, a MUCH bigger fee as they are dealing with Spurs who I wouldn't particularly describe as transfer savvy, unless of course they deal with Sheff Utd:) Leeds have just sold Delph, who has spent nearly all his professional career in League 1, to Villa for £8 million. Anyone who wasn't questioning United's decision to sell their 2 star players for £8 million (rising to £10 million) should be now. MrMuscle 05-08-2009, 22:58 It is correct. I think we should get rid of him asap! and get a striker!!! this is what we needed this will let wood play in the back 4. Up the owls! MrMuscle 05-08-2009, 23:05 yes it is true as i said in my previous comment but it is said that laws won't accept anything less than 3 mill. lomaxkinesis 05-08-2009, 23:37 According to Lee Strafford its a load of rubbish. sheff71 06-08-2009, 00:26 £3m would seem a good price for him, and is what Laws is reported to want for him - as Spurs are getting desperate for centre backs, i'm sure they'll be willing to go that far for him. Having said that, if they're willing to splash out at least £8m on two kids that haven't managed a full Championship season between them (and one less than 10 games), then who knows...! This sale would add fresh money to the club coffers (after probably pushing them to the limit by the Tudgay affair), and with Wood and Purse, Beevers wouldn't be that badly missed - he may have peaked already (as with the Kyles) - so £3m would not be bad business at all. Panthera 06-08-2009, 00:27 just hope he doesnt have to eat these words later in the week. Chris Johnson beevers off 2 spurs??? 2 hours ago · Comment · LikeUnlike · View Feedback (3)Hide feedback (3) You like this. Lee Strafford nope 2 hours ago sheff71 06-08-2009, 00:30 just hope he doesnt have to eat these words later in the week. Chris Johnson beevers off 2 spurs??? 2 hours ago · Comment · LikeUnlike · View Feedback (3)Hide feedback (3) You like this. Lee Strafford nope 2 hours ago If the Spurs bids are genuine and they go higher, and the owls board refuse, then the owls fans should really show their support in big numbers in the opening games of the season - it'd be a brave/foolish path to go down for Strafford, to keep turning down good offers from better placed clubs. Panthera 06-08-2009, 00:33 the way spurs are throwing money around, like you say beevers has more experience than some of his latest buys, i would hold out for £6 mill at least and with a sell on clause. AltyOwl 06-08-2009, 00:35 yes it is true as i said in my previous comment but it is said that laws won't accept anything less than 3 mill. Please expand as Lee Strafford has said its rubbish, as previously stated. sheff71 06-08-2009, 01:30 Please expand as Lee Strafford has said its rubbish, as previously stated. But what's he said is rubbish? The £2m offer? that you might sell him at the right price? that Spurs have even enquired? Strafford just saying "it's rubbish" isn't very helpful! :) scoobydotcom 06-08-2009, 09:52 But what's he said is rubbish? The £2m offer? that you might sell him at the right price? that Spurs have even enquired? Strafford just saying "it's rubbish" isn't very helpful! :) it'll do for me! hopefully another sign from the club that we are past the days of selling our best players, brunt whelan bougherra etc MR BENN 06-08-2009, 09:58 if this offer has been made it shows we dont have to sell our best young talent ,unlike other clubs ,who have to watch their best players sold. it must be heartbreaking for the fans, to see the lack of ambition from their club selling its best players . Bladesman 06-08-2009, 10:04 I always thought that Redknapp was an ugly mofo too but it turns out it was due to a major accident. Anyway i'd rather stare at his face than listen to the garbage his son spouts while attempting to impersonate a football pundit. £2 million for Beevers.......United would have snatched Redknapp's hand off... and his arm...... and one side of his mashed up face. If Wednesday have any sense they will hold off for a bigger fee, a MUCH bigger fee as they are dealing with Spurs who I wouldn't particularly describe as transfer savvy, unless of course they deal with Sheff Utd:) Leeds have just sold Delph, who has spent nearly all his professional career in League 1, to Villa for £8 million. Anyone who wasn't questioning United's decision to sell their 2 star players for £8 million (rising to £10 million) should be now. Exactly. Be interesting to see if Wednesday can hold out for a really good price. hurstyowl 06-08-2009, 10:36 if we were offered £6,000,000+ for beevers i would give him a piggy back ride down there! we've got wood, purse, spurr and simek who will be a big boost for the team as he was quality before he got injured. it wouldnt be the best move of his life though, turning down a first team spot in return for a place on the bench when spurs injured players return. id rather get a very good championship striker so if that offer comes in take it. Billy B 06-08-2009, 11:12 Mr Benn You really do my head in, that last post is a load of crap where does selling 2 youngsters who may not make the step up to the premier league mean a lack of ambition. We were offered 10million plus for two players that have played less than 40 games between them, we have spent £3million on a player that Wednesday can only dream of signing. I'll tell you now you will have to sell your best players if not in this transfer window then in the next because there will be no investment coming your way soon, and the books will have to be balanced, if you get off to a crap start and are hovering around the relegation zone and the crowds are dwindling trust me you will be selling you prize (singular) asset As for heart breaking losing a loved one is heart breaking seeing a player transferred is all part and parcel of football, if you get heartbroken over that you need to get a life and grow up scoobydotcom 06-08-2009, 11:35 Mr Benn You really do my head in, that last post is a load of crap where does selling 2 youngsters who may not make the step up to the premier league mean a lack of ambition. We were offered 10million plus for two players that have played less than 40 games between them, we have spent £3million on a player that Wednesday can only dream of signing. I'll tell you now you will have to sell your best players if not in this transfer window then in the next because there will be no investment coming your way soon, and the books will have to be balanced, if you get off to a crap start and are hovering around the relegation zone and the crowds are dwindling trust me you will be selling you prize (singular) asset As for heart breaking losing a loved one is heart breaking seeing a player transferred is all part and parcel of football, if you get heartbroken over that you need to get a life and grow up What part of SWFC making a profit do you not understand Billy B? we do not have to sell if Lee Strafford & Brian Laws deem it more beneficial to our club to keep them ... i suggest you learn the facts before having a pop in future canadablade 06-08-2009, 11:38 Mr Benn You really do my head in, :hihi::hihi::hihi::hihi: Join the growing list Billy As for Beevers, Is this the same lad who was a world beater at the start of last season then couldn't get a game near the end ? Scored a cracking goal though against Watford, too bad it was in his own net :hihi::hihi: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5WB7L-vROM scottf 06-08-2009, 11:38 2 mil- not a bad price for a young uncapped centre-half that- id hold out for 3 though if i were you. To be honest you wouldn't sell him anyway- you would be left with woods and purse as your only recognised centrebacks- thats too risky in the championship. MR BENN 06-08-2009, 11:55 Mr Benn You really do my head in, that last post is a load of crap where does selling 2 youngsters who may not make the step up to the premier league mean a lack of ambition. We were offered 10million plus for two players that have played less than 40 games between them, we have spent £3million on a player that Wednesday can only dream of signing. I'll tell you now you will have to sell your best players if not in this transfer window then in the next because there will be no investment coming your way soon, and the books will have to be balanced, if you get off to a crap start and are hovering around the relegation zone and the crowds are dwindling trust me you will be selling you prize (singular) asset As for heart breaking losing a loved one is heart breaking seeing a player transferred is all part and parcel of football, if you get heartbroken over that you need to get a life and grow up That was a big bite Billy ;) Jazzybmzoo 06-08-2009, 12:00 Under no circumstances should we sell Beevers. Of all the players in our squad, he would be the most likely to do well in the Premier League and as such, should not be sold until we get their ourselves. If Spurs did come in with a stupud bid of say 4-5m+ the yes, poss look to sell and get a quality striker in but very much against this in priciple, as I firmly believe that he & Purse at the back, with Woody as reserve is as good as gets for CBs in this league. MR BENN 06-08-2009, 12:03 Under no circumstances should we sell Beevers. Of all the players in our squad, he would be the most likely to do well in the Premier League and as such, should not be sold until we get their ourselves. If Spurs did come in with a stupud bid of say 4-5m+ the yes, poss look to sell and get a quality striker in but very much against this in priciple, as I firmly believe that he & Purse at the back, with Woody as reserve is as good as gets for CBs in this league. i dont think you will find a better pairing in the championship ,and Beevers can learn a lot from playing along side Purse AltyOwl 06-08-2009, 12:03 2 mil- not a bad price for a young uncapped centre-half that- id hold out for 3 though if i were you. To be honest you wouldn't sell him anyway- you would be left with woods and purse as your only recognised centrebacks- thats too risky in the championship. Don't forget Richard Hinds. He was by far our most reliable defender last season in my opinion. scottf 06-08-2009, 12:55 i dont think you will find a better pairing in the championship ,and Beevers can learn a lot from playing along side Purse I think bassong and taylor at birmingham might have something to say about that. Plus in my opinion kilgallon and morgan are better than beevers and purse. AltyOwl 06-08-2009, 12:58 I think bassong and taylor at birmingham might have something to say about that. Plus in my opinion kilgallon and morgan are better than beevers and purse. Brum are a prem side. Gi over about Morgan. Kilgallon I'll give you, though when he's played Wednesday he's been off the boil. Beevers potentially could be a good Premiership player, but as I say potentially. scottf 06-08-2009, 13:02 Brum are a prem side. Gi over about Morgan. Kilgallon I'll give you, though when he's played Wednesday he's been off the boil. Beevers potentially could be a good Premiership player, but as I say potentially. sorry- i ment to say newcastle!!!! I think purse is = to morgan and Beevers is = to killa so i think were about the same. Same mix of expierence and youth, skill and . . . .erm . . directness ;) scottf 06-08-2009, 13:03 Kilgallon I'll give you, though when he's played Wednesday he's been off the boil. Never mind- off the boil- he's been off the bloody pitch!!!!! ;) alex3659 06-08-2009, 13:41 Under no circumstances should we sell Beevers. Of all the players in our squad, he would be the most likely to do well in the Premier League and as such, should not be sold until we get their ourselves. If Spurs did come in with a stupud bid of say 4-5m+ the yes, poss look to sell and get a quality striker in but very much against this in priciple, as I firmly believe that he & Purse at the back, with Woody as reserve is as good as gets for CBs in this league. The problem is Jazzy,most championship players have clauses in their contracts allowing them to talk to premier clubs. canadablade 06-08-2009, 14:08 If i had the choice between Purse and Beevers and Morgs and Killa It would be Morgs and Killa EVERYTIME. Very hard to score against us last season and these 2 were the reason why. Very easy to score against you lot last season (apart from united..LOL ) granted you didn't have Purse but, you go on about having the best goalie in the league. AltyOwl 06-08-2009, 14:12 If i had the choice between Purse and Beevers and Morgs and Killa It would be Morgs and Killa EVERYTIME. Very hard to score against us last season and these 2 were the reason why. Very easy to score against you lot last season (apart from united..LOL ) granted you didn't have Purse but, you go on about having the best goalie in the league. We had one of the best defensive HOME records last year. It was the away form where we suffered and I believe that was due to the inexperience from our younger players - Wood, Spurr, Beevers. Hopefully Purse will bring that much needed experience and that will improve our defence even further. Panthera 06-08-2009, 14:14 laws has been on HallamFM news stating there has been no offers from any club concerning mark beevers, no one has phoned about him or enquired about him moving to a premier league club Panthera 06-08-2009, 14:16 We had one of the best defensive HOME records last year. It was the away form where we suffered and I believe that was due to the inexperience from our younger players - Wood, Spurr, Beevers. Hopefully Purse will bring that much needed experience and that will improve our defence even further. It was the best, laws said it in an interview the other week, but like you say it was the away record that let us down and laws believes that a 10% improvement in the away results would see us in the play offs this season. alex3659 06-08-2009, 14:20 It was the best, laws said it in an interview the other week, but like you say it was the away record that let us down and laws believes that a 10% improvement in the away results would see us in the play offs this season. Probably right there mate,same for blades but at home,beat doncaster and wednesday and we would have been in the promissed land. However I blame it on delaying in the loan market to guarantee the loanees were eligable for the play offs,it left us very short staffed for about half a dozen games. lomaxkinesis 06-08-2009, 14:34 Strafford got interviewed on Sky Sports news saying the whole story was a load of tosh. canadablade 06-08-2009, 14:37 It was the best, laws said it in an interview the other week, but like you say it was the away record that let us down and laws believes that a 10% improvement in the away results would see us in the play offs this season. Whereas the Blades had by far the best defensive record away from home and the 2nd best total goals against in the division only to promoted Birmingham http://soccernet.espn.go.com/tables?league=eng.2&season=2008&seasonType=1&cc=3888 Like i said Killa and Morgs anyday :love: Panthera 06-08-2009, 15:38 spurs have signed defender Bassong from newcastle for £8mill hurstyowl 06-08-2009, 15:39 spurs have signed defender Bassong from newcastle for £8mill thats not good, got him in my championship fantasy team, wont let me do any transfers! MR BENN 06-08-2009, 15:47 thats not good, got him in my championship fantasy team, wont let me do any transfers! it should do -i had Martins at newcastle and i got rid of him yesterday for a reading striker Billy B 06-08-2009, 16:22 Mr Benn should walk that fantasy league thing after all he lives in a fantasy world Dimitri 11 06-08-2009, 16:40 Exactly. Be interesting to see if Wednesday can hold out for a really good price. They have taken the 1st logical step to doing this in by completely dismissing the link and not showing their hand. They have so far kept hold of Tudgay by taking a similar no-nonsense approach and you've got to credit them for it, as although it won't always work and some star players will end up leaving (not necessarily this year but at some stage it's going to happen - look at Ronaldo!), Wednesday are not going to seen as a soft touch. McCabe has overall done a good job at the Lane and Strafford could pick up a lot of tips from him, however negotiating fees for outgoing players won't be one of them.....Weds fans better hope not anyway:) AltyOwl 06-08-2009, 16:54 http://www.swfc.co.uk/page/News/0,,10304~1745576,00.html alex3659 06-08-2009, 17:03 How many defenders do Spurs need anyway? Panthera 06-08-2009, 17:05 they're trying to buy all the best young british talent for when the new premier rules come in concerning non uk players crookesey 06-08-2009, 17:19 Mr Benn should walk that fantasy league thing after all he lives in a fantasy world He's probably having a far better time in his world than a lot of folk are having in theirs. He never retaliates to the massive amounts of insults that are hurled at him, and he never insults anyone. He's just addicted to posting, nowt wrong with that. :thumbsup: MrMuscle 06-08-2009, 21:46 I fit was me I would sell him get a striker asap. But laws says that he has not received a offer for beevers. MR BENN 06-08-2009, 21:50 they're trying to buy all the best young british talent for when the new premier rules come in concerning non uk players i think its long overdue the rule on non uk players . as it stands its barmy kayie 06-08-2009, 22:00 i all love mr benn dont we come on owls bigrbuk 07-08-2009, 10:21 No need to get rid of beevers. Def keep him and we've got the money for a loan striker anyway apparently. canadablade 07-08-2009, 11:54 i all love mr benn dont we come on owls Does this sentence also come in English ? |