Is it just me or are other men really attracted to girls bottoms?

Perhaps I am a sex maniac:hihi: :hihi:

Questions by females that a male can never answer:

"Does my bum look big in this?"

And the winner of the most amusing post of the day goes to......

Doubt this post will be on here for long... I tried to start a similar topic and I believe it was pulled.

Am in agreement with you though. I have a healthy appreciation for good examples of both male and female derrieres.

Not so much of a fan when they've lost their shape due to too many MacDonalds though!:heyhey:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
Perhaps I am a sex maniac:hihi: :hihi:

I think that would involve actually having sex.

im just happy that slimsid didnt use the american word for bottom as im sure the sex police would have arrested him by now:loopy: :loopy: :loopy:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
Is it just me or are other men really attracted to girls bottoms?

Perhaps I am a sex maniac:hihi: :hihi:

How old are you Slimsid? My guess is approx 16/17 - am I close? I'm basing this on the countless threads that you start in reference to girls. Perhaps you should find another outlet for your testosterone charged cravings!

Your question is so dumb. Of course men like women's bottoms. Apart from some men that is who like um... other men's bottoms.

I still can't work out if slimsid is a very funny person, sitting at home laughing... or just a rather sad person who needs to get out a lot more.

Come to think of it, I think that about a lot of people on here.

Originally posted by JonJParr
How old are you Slimsid? My guess is approx 16/17 - am I close? I'm basing this on the countless threads that you start in reference to girls. Perhaps you should find another outlet for your testosterone charged cravings!

Your question is so dumb. Of course men like women's bottoms. Apart from some men that is who like um... other men's bottoms.

double that age.

Originally posted by robbie
double that age.

You've got to be kidding.

All guys like womens bums, no matter there age

Its about time we all clubbed too and sent Slimsid off to be
"Sorted out"...at a venue of his own choice.
Then we might get threads of a different nature started as the novelty will have worn off.:)

Originally posted by JonJParr
How old are you Slimsid? My guess is approx 16/17 - am I close? I'm basing this on the countless threads that you start in reference to girls. Perhaps you should find another outlet for your testosterone charged cravings!



I'm almost 35. is that relevent. Not only 17 year olds have a healthy interest in the oposite sex. What do you expect me to do - take up crown green bowling?

What you have is not a healthy interest

i love bottoms and arses love me :D

Originally posted by cruella
Its about time we all clubbed too and sent Slimsid off to be
"Sorted out"...at a venue of his own choice.
Then we might get threads of a different nature started as the novelty will have worn off.:)

Do you mean laid or castrated?

Originally posted by nick2
I think that would involve actually having sex.

I disagree. I think most people who have sex probably don't think about it as much as those who can't get any.

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I'm almost 35. is that relevent. Not only 17 year olds have a healthy interest in the oposite sex. What do you expect me to do - take up crown green bowling?

Perhaps you don't feel it was relevant, it's just that given the nature of your recent postings (Find me a girlfriend / Will someone go out with me / Do all men like girls bottoms) I thought that you were about 16 or 17.

There's a healthy interest and there's an unhealthy 'I've got RSI' interest..... which are you? Perhaps you should take up a sport!

So have we all arrived at the basic conclusion that Slimsid is old, lonely, and not getting any? :hihi:

Slimsid,

Do you . . . . . . . .

Love big butts and you cannot lie! All you other brothers can't deny!! :D

Originally posted by Lestat
Slimsid,

Do you . . . . . . . .

Love big butts and you cannot lie! All you other brothers can't deny!! :D

my baby got back - sir mixalot

do i get a gold star

:) :) :)

When a girl walks in with an itty bitty waist, and a round thing in your face you get sprung?

when a girl walks in with an itty bitty waist...

ah. bottoms. As a girl, I can tell you owning one isn't as much fun as you make looking at them sound!

EDIT: Snook and I seem to think alike! lol

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I disagree. I think most people who have sex probably don't think about it as much as those who can't get any.

I get plenty and I'm still always thinking about it, thats just what men do.

Do you have a Humiliation fetish slim sid? the reason i ask is, the way in which you word your posts always leaves you open to ridicule,
And the fact that you don't seem to take any advice given.
The answer to your question i would have thought is fairly obvious, and i'm guessing you already know.
So do you enjoy being the BUTT of joke or are you just teasing us, for the CRACK like.
Anyway best of luck with finding a lass, i look forward to your I'VE PULLED thread in the future.

Originally posted by nick2
I get plenty and I'm still always thinking about it, thats just what men do.

me too! :) nice womans bottom, just right for bending over and......................

Leave the poor man alone you miserable bunch of arses (arf). I think a forum thread on women's bottoms is a fine example of the wide ranging discussions on the forum these days (I mean, there are hundreds, if not thousands now, posts in the Big Brother 6 megathread you sad, lonely, need-to-get-out-more people).

Slimsid I salute you. Keep going fella :)

Personally I think women's bottoms are ace.

I am amused at the mockery [especially that unleashed by my pal, Jon J Parr] the author of this thread has attracted. When I launched a similar thread, 'Who has the best arse in entertainment' earlier this year, fellow posters engaged in respectful debate with me as to the delights of the female buttocks. Perhaps I possess a gravitas, and a scholarly credibility on the subject, which the callow young author of this thread has yet to develop?

At any rate, I shall answer his, quite reasonable question with candour. Yes, I like female bottoms. In my case, I prefer the fuller figure [though not the rotund, football-like shapes that tend to ignite Abu Dhabi]. The singer and musical entertainer known as Beyonce certainly has magnificent, pneumatic buttocks of a most spankable kind. As does Kate Winslet. As do a great many women, in fact. Shorts can enhance the female bottom quite fetchingly, and tight jeans. Yes, female bottoms contribute greatly to the sum of male happiness. Life would be a vale of tears without them. Pass the bromide.

Originally posted by Kerry_Lou
All guys like womens bums, no matter there age

I suggest you get your sexy ass down to The Forum bar tonight for some funky latin beats!

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by timo


At any rate, I shall answer his, quite reasonable question with candour. Yes, I like female bottoms. In my case, I prefer the fuller figure [though not the rotund, football-like shapes that tend to ignite Abu Dhabi]. The singer and musical entertainer known as Beyonce certainly has magnificent, pneumatic buttocks of a most spankable kind. As does Kate Winslet. As do a great many women, in fact. Shorts can enhance the female bottom quite fetchingly, and tight jeans. Yes, female bottoms contribute greatly to the sum of male happiness. Life would be a vale of tears without them.

Poetry sheer poetry.

28 and cant get enough of them ... especially this time of year.

Its only natural as the female form is designed to catch the males eye.

I say lets see more :heyhey: :heyhey: :heyhey:

I must take this opportunity to commend all the lovely ladies here in Sheffield. I have almost crashed my car many times already this summer! Do all the pretty women only have summer wardrobes so don’t come out in the winter, or are you all just covered up a 15 layers so we can’t tell what you look like?

Originally posted by slimsid2000
What do you expect me to do - take up crown green bowling?

Why not give it a go, Sid? You are bound to see plenty of women bending over.

yeah i like a nice butt too :)

*refrains from singing any two live crew songs that might get him into trouble*

Oh for the aesthetic, heart lifting sight of a tulip shaped botty nestled & carressed in hugging white cotton cladding... :rolleyes: :thumbsup:

Count me in.....i'm a bum fan.

wooohooo, bottom on!

Ah, so, not just me then :-D

Nothing better than a perfectly heart shaped backside dripped into a tight pair of jeans, they have to be the kind with the lines though, not the muscled buns of a workout enthusiast, natural, curvy, cute buns, yummy.......

It's all based in our deepest natural urges with the apes, and how the female ape would expose their buttocks to the male when in heat, similar thing, but, not as blatant, I ain't aware of many females with bright red buttocks, well, not unspanked ones, lol.

Bottoms???
I like to look a little higher.... at the front..:P








at their face:heyhey:

What the f....?

Everyone likes bottoms. What a weird thread. The slimsid guy is scary.

40 Summat- thankyou for your kind words, dear heart. There is something sublime about Beyonce's bottom, in my view. As what is known as an 'assman', in common parlance, the sudden acceptance of women with bigger bottoms, such as the former chanteuse, Davina McCall, Jennifer Lopez etc caused me great pleasure. Let us celebrate women with curvaceous, downright womanly figures, not the dreadful 'little boy' look of so many fashion house models. Frankly, this cove wants 'booty' not bones.

Just off to make love to a beautiful woman [don't tell my wife]...

I too love girls (and womens) bottoms. Presentation is the key, however. In the 'seventies, jeans seemed to be cut with the aim of accentuating the natural peachy fulsomeness of a ladies rear end. This was achieved primarily by having the waist set at the waist, rather than half-way down the hips, as is the current trend on a high street near you. The contemporary 'nearly off' look does little for me, and looks particularly awful on thin young ladies. Add a thong and.......on second thoughts, don't.

My first girlfriend, due to some miraculous cosmic error in my favour, had the most magnificent backside I have ever seen (she was extremely bright and funny into the bargain). She once turned up having cycled to my house wearing a low cut t-shirt and almost pornographically skimpy blue short-shorts sans underwear. 'Copping an eyeful' hardly begins to cover it, as it were. I remember her remarking how many drivers had pipped her on her way over. It's a wonder there were any lampposts left standing en route.

Thank God I had the foresight to take a selection of commemorative photographs, signed copies of which are available for a mere fifty quid each...

didnt spinal tap do a song about bottoms at some point >?

wish i could remember the what it was called:(

Originally posted by Don_Kiddick
Oh for the aesthetic, heart lifting sight of a tulip shaped botty nestled & carressed in hugging white cotton cladding... :rolleyes: :thumbsup: :confused: :confused: Hee, hee, hee. Before anyone says anything - I GET IT- I know he WASN'T talking about me:thumbsup:

Originally posted by panda79
didnt spinal tap do a song about bottoms at some point >?

wish i could remember the what it was called:(

Think it was called 'Big Bottom' :o

Dont forget queen.... did it go somthing like 'fat bottom girls you make the rocking world go round'? although cant really see this bearing any relevance to freddie

Originally posted by Splodge_CRB
Think it was called 'Big Bottom' :o

Yeah, with the immortal lyric "Big bottom/ Big bottom/ Talk about mudflaps/ My girl's got 'em!"

Nice thread. I love girls with big arses, me. :D

Amen to the female rear !!!

Originally posted by honeyplanet
Dont forget queen.... did it go somthing like 'fat bottom girls you make the rocking world go round'? although cant really see this bearing any relevance to freddie

It's my theme tune!

"Are you going to take me home tonight
Ah down beside that red firelight
Are you gonna let it all hang out
Fat bottomed girls, you make the rockin world go round

Hey I was just a skinny lad
Never knew no good from bad
But I knew life before I left my nursery
Left alone with big fat Fanny
She was such a naughty nanny
Heap big woman you made a bad boy out of me, Hey hey!


I've been singing with my band
Across the wire, across the land
I seen every blue eyed floozy on the way
But their beauty and their style
Went kind of smooth after a while
Take me to them dirty ladies everytime, come on

Oh won't you take me home tonight
Oh down beside your red firelight
Oh and you give it all you got
Fat bottomed girls, you make the rocking world go round
Fat bottomed girls, you make the rocking world go round

Hey listen here
Now your mortgages and homes
I've got stiffness in your bones
Ain't no beauty queens in this locality (I tell you)
Oh but I still get my pleasure
Still get my greatest treasure
Heap big woman you gonna make a big man out of me

Oh you gonna take me home tonight (please)
Oh down beside that red firelight
Oh you gonna let it all hang out
Fat bottomed girls you make the rocking world go round
Fat bottomed girls you make the rocking world go round
Get on your bikes and ride

Oooo- yeah
Fat bottomed girls (Yeaah, yeah,)
Fat bottomed girls (Yes, yes)

P "big girl and proud of it" T

I must be an ass man, because everywhere I go, people shout "You're an ass, man..." :D

I sincerely hope that female forum users realise from the sentiments expressed in this thread- a shrine to bottom appreciation- that their bottoms are much admired by the great majority of heterosexual men. We like you just as you are, girls. You do not need to model yourselves upon the bony, elfin figures of the catwalk. Please don your buttock-enhancing 'batty rider' shorts now, and wiggle, jiggle and bounce your collective booty. It will add greatly to the gaiety of the nation [it might cause a few cardiac arrests too], and to the sum of human happiness!

Just filled out form! Getting it for a gag gift... Really... That video is a hoot!!!!!! The men in the video - too funny... If that were men doing the same thing, I think I'd die of a coronary laughing so hard...

Thanks for the post!!!!!!!!! :clap:

Everybody loves bottoms. Especially when they have to sit down.

How can you not love a gorgeous bottom - I'll get it fixed soon. :mad:

cccaaaaww im such an ass man- you can keep your big boobs but if she has a nice bum then im sold :D :D

I'just had a few days off the forum and this is the funniest thread I have returned to!

Timo :

Life would be a vale of tears without them.

Skny :
Everyone likes bottoms. What a weird thread. The slimsid guy is scary

Lestat this made me laugh out loud (I'm in the library!!):

Slimsid,

Do you . . . . . . . .

Love big butts and you cannot lie! All you other brothers can't deny!!


Today my bottom swings with pride :)

carrying on from Baby's Got Back and Fat-Bottomed Girls, there was a song a few years back called Big Panty Woman, got alot of airtime on R2 but can't for the life of me remember who it's by- highly entertaining song though if you can find it!

Originally posted by KookyKoo
carrying on from Baby's Got Back and Fat-Bottomed Girls, there was a song a few years back called Big Panty Woman, got alot of airtime on R2 but can't for the life of me remember who it's by- highly entertaining song though if you can find it! SCBD
The Chart of the Flops
Big Panty Woman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Hula hula-la, hula hula-la, hula hula-la-lay,
Hula hula-la, hula hula-la, hula hula-la-lay.)

The band they were getting the rhythm,
The drummer was beating in time.
They played a real real hot soukous:
I had to get off my behind.

I want to dance with a big panty woman,
I want to dance with a big panty girl,
I want to dance with a big panty mamma,
I want to give that big lady a whirl.

(How about extra large?) No, bigger than that.
(Double X?) Bigger than that.
(Triple X?) Ha! That will do.
(How about double D?) Bigger than that.
(Double E?) Bigger than that.
(Double G?) Size fifty-two.

I like plenty meat with potatoes,
I like plenty sugar with tea,
I like something that I can hold on to:
So come shake the dancefloor with me.

I want to dance with a big panty woman,
I want to dance with a big panty girl,
I want to dance with a big panty mamma,
I want to give that big lady a whirl.

(How about extra large?) No, bigger than that.
(Double X?) Bigger than that.
(Triple X?) Yes, that will do.
(How about double D?) Bigger than that.
(Double E?) Bigger than that.
(Double G?) Size fifty-two.

I don't want to dance with a toothpick,
I don't want to dance with pure bone;
I want to feel all of your spare tyres,
I want to feel all of your silicone.

I want to dance with a big panty woman.
I want to dance with a big panty girl.
I want to dance with a big panty mamma.
I want to give a big lady a whirl.

(How about extra large?) No, bigger than that.
(Double X?) Bigger than that.
(Triple X?) Ha! That will do.
(How about double D?) Bigger than that.
(Double E?) Bigger than that.
(Double G?) Size fifty-two.

(Hula hula-la, hula hula-la, hula hula-la-lay,
Hula hula-la, hula hula-la, hula hula-la-lay.)

(How about extra large?) No, bigger than that.
(Double X?) Bigger than that.
(Triple X?) Yes, that will do.
(How about double D?) Bigger than that.
(Double E?) Bigger than that.
(Double G?) Size fifty-two.

Appearances
Number in November 1998
Number in March 1999
Number 13 in April 1999
Number 16 in June 1999

Is that it?

Originally posted by Lestat
How can you not love a gorgeous bottom (http://http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v233/lestatt209/botty.jpg)

hm lestat

that link comes up as microsoft xp sp 2 not a gorgeous bottom :(

*phones the trading standards up*

Originally posted by melthebell
hm lestat

that link comes up as microsoft xp sp 2 not a gorgeous bottom :(

*phones the trading standards up* I think Lestat likes to play practical jokes!:P

Originally posted by melthebell
hm lestat

that link comes up as microsoft xp sp 2 not a gorgeous bottom :(

*phones the trading standards up*

I think there is a connection to an assh*le there though.

yeah Tulip that's the one LOL, must find a copy of it for some laughs :)

Originally posted by Kerry_Lou
All guys like womens bums, no matter there age

Er, excuse me? Do I feel a generalisation coming on???

Kenneth Tynan, the celebrated theatre critic and sado-masochist wrote a brilliant treatise on the history of the beautiful bum as depicted in Western art. The work is full of arcane references to the depiction of the delights of the derriere in Western literature and paintings. Its well worth reading.

He was also the originator of the famous musical Oh Calcutta!, which was first performed on Broadway in 1969 and which ran in the West End for several years. The performers were naked for much of the time. Oh Calcutta is an Anglicised version of the French phrase 'O quel cul t'as', meaning oh what a cute ass you have! Tynan was also the first person to use the f word on British TV.

More recently, on his album Encore, Eminem has quite a good ass song, with accompanying mock Eastern rhythms (a little reminiscent of Led Zeppelin's Kashmir). Part of it goes:

The way you shake it I'd never leave it
I aint never seen an ass like that
the way you move it
You make my pee pee go
d'doing doing doing

The way you shake it I'd never leave it
I don't believe it
Its almost too good to be true
You make my pee pee go d'doing doing doing.
I ain't never seen an ass like that

How does the spinal tap song go?

The looser the waistband the deeper the quicksand - or so I have read!

Big bottom, drive me out of my mind -
How could I leave this behind?

does my bum look big in this !!!!!!

Originally posted by louise170419
does my bum look big in this !!!!!!

no dear you look lovely ;)

well thanks alot robbie babe

Kathythebean,
Glad you liked my quip. I am so very, very pleased that your, no doubt magnificent, bottom will 'swing with pride'. That is how it should be, gorgeous creature. Please feel free to give myself and other male posters [I type, flushed of face, with trembling fingers...] a sight of your, gulp, delicious backside. By the way, I am available for private tuition, if you know what I mean...

Originally posted by slimsid2000
Is it just me or are other men really attracted to girls bottoms?

Perhaps I am a sex maniac:hihi: :hihi:

JOIN THE CLUB!!!

no pictures then!

why don't we start a sweepstake for when Slim Sid makes his first appearance on Crimewatch..... :heyhey:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I disagree. I think most people who have sex probably don't think about it as much as those who can't get any.

bit dissapointed that no ladies have confessed to having a really nice bottom!!! come on ladies, fess up, :thumbsup:

Its quite a lot of fun watchin u giys get all excited about them to be honest.

As for fessing up about having nice posteriors, we couldn't possibly do that!

Bertie,
Yes, I can envisage how the story might go.' Police would like to trace this man, known on the Sheffield Forum website as 'Slim Sid 2000'. He is responsible for the posting of some particularly unseemly material about 'girls bottoms'. This particular 'thread', as they are known, has become a magnet for perverts. Previous threads have included such plaintive titles as 'Would you go out with me?', and 'Is it true that girls sit down to pee?' Any information will be treated in the strictest confidence'. Only joshing, Sid!

Timo :o

How dare you. Private tuition. If your wife knew of your shennanigans. In this day and age as well. I have the right to walk down the street without being ogled. Women are not just objects you know.

:hihi:

(Today, I actually have a new skirt on my nice, if a little ample, bottom)

Beware though - not all bottoms are worth praising:

A horrible bottom (http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.uglypeople.co.uk/uglypeople/gallery/thumbnails/huge_horrible_bum.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.uglypeople.co.uk/uglypeople/gallery/%3Fstart%3D196&h=150&w=117&sz=3&tbnid=_cGoBjd7YCMJ:&tbnh=90&tbnw=70&hl=en&start=20&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhuge%2Bbum%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26l r%3D%26sa%3DN)

Originally posted by timo
Previous threads have included such plaintive titles as 'Would you go out with me?', and 'Is it true that girls sit down to pee?'

Don't forget his thread proposing that we should all be forced to carry alcohol ID cards that limited us to only drinking our daily recommended allowance of alcohol units and no more. (would this limit you to only buying mini bottles of wine Timo?)

His reasoning for this? He would finally be able to get into bars on a Friday night to see all the 'pretty girls' without being bullied by binge drinking men.

Or the thread where he was banging on about not wanting to be "attacked" by gay men when he's out drinking.

Or the Emma Bunton "fan" site, with galeries of pictures organised by "body part"

Thankyou Disco Cat and Nick 2 for providing us with a clearer, more up to date picture of SlimSid. So, this strange cove is bullied by binge-drinking men, favours alcohol id cards, lives in fear of attacks by predatory gays, keeps an Emma Bunton fansite organised by body parts, is obsessed with girls bottoms, and asks women via a public internet forum if they would 'go out' with him. It is not looking good, is it?

No it gets worse he's also a STUDENT!

Just so you all know...i have found my bum twin!

Slim sid, maybe you should stop staring at girl's bums and start talking to them! (erm not to their bums)

Originally posted by CherryNicole
Just so you all know...i have found my bum twin!



huh? :huh:

Originally posted by CherryNicole


Slim sid, maybe you should stop staring at girl's bums and start talking to them! (erm not to their bums)

good point. I do try talking to girls but am not very good at it. Girls never seem to warm to me the way they do other males. I usually try making eye contact and maybe a little smile to test the water as it were but don't tend to get very positive responses.

Originally posted by slimsid2000
good point. I do try talking to girls but am not very good at it. Girls never seem to warm to me the way they do other males. I usually try making eye contact and maybe a little smile to test the water as it were but don't tend to get very positive responses.

How do you mean you're not very good at it, what happens !?

Originally posted by Jamie
How do you mean you're not very good at it, what happens !?

If I look or smile at a girl (either in a bar or just in an everyday situation - at bus stop etc) they either make little or no response, laugh or look disgusted.

Originally posted by slimsid2000
If I look or smile at a girl (either in a bar or just in an everyday situation - at bus stop etc) they either make little or no response, laugh or look disgusted.

are they old enough to understand male antiques though

Originally posted by CherryNicole
maybe you should stop staring at girl's bums and start talking to them! (erm not to their bums)

Its chests I have a problem with :shakes:

Unless you say Oi me face is here... Not down there :suspect:

Originally posted by steelcitybab
are they old enough to understand male antiques though

You're a very rude girl. I shall have to put you over my knee and give you a good spanking:hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

Oh dear - I'd better go and have a cold shower.

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I shall have to put you over my knee and give you a good spanking.

She'd probably enjoy it tho mate :hihi:

I know I would.:hihi: :hihi:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
You're a very rude girl. I shall have to put you over my knee and give you a good spanking:hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

Oh dear - I'd better go and have a cold shower.

i was on about your preference to young girls actually... please don't make me barf my lunch :gag:

I haven't been giving them enough credit.... :hihi:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
If I look or smile at a girl (either in a bar or just in an everyday situation - at bus stop etc) they either make little or no response, laugh or look disgusted.

Sid dribbles.....:heyhey:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
You're a very rude girl. I shall have to put you over my knee and give you a good spanking:hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

Oh dear - I'd better go and have a cold shower.

SlimSid,

Have you ever experienced the unimaginable sensual delights of a living, breathing woman's body or do you go home every night to a pot noodle?

Originally posted by LordChaverly
SlimSid,

Have you ever experienced the unimaginable sensual delights of a living, breathing woman's body or do you go home every night to a pot noodle?

Have you never had the Pot Noodle Horn?? lol! :D

Originally posted by slimsid2000
good point. I do try talking to girls but am not very good at it. Girls never seem to warm to me the way they do other males. I usually try making eye contact and maybe a little smile to test the water as it were but don't tend to get very positive responses.

We really are going to have to meet you to find out why slim sid. After you've spoken to me for 10 minutes you'll wonder why you ever wanted to speak to a girl :D heehee come to a meet!

Oh, and in response to my bum twin comment....evil dr neil is my bum twin! don't let that put you off...we both have really nice bums...don't we Kristian??

Originally posted by CherryNicole
Oh, and in response to my bum twin comment....evil dr neil is my bum twin! don't let that put you off...we both have really nice bums...don't we Kristian?? I know you do have a rather nice bum Nicola ;)

SlimSid,
As an acknowledged 'expert lover' in four continents, I feel that I should offer you a bit of advice in good faith. You are making a mistake in sidling up to women in your callow and gauche way, with a shy smile/nervous grimace playing about your lips. Women appreciate an aura of sexual confidence in a man. Yours is a world of Emma Bunton 'body parts', and [as Lord C suggests] lonely pot noodle suppers. So, you are going to have to model yourself upon someone who knows he has sex appeal but yet retains an endearing, boyish clumsiness with the opposite sex. What about the handsome actor, Hugh Grant? You could practice his plummy accent and mannerisms in front of the mirror until perfected. Then, you could hit the town. Women of South Yorkshire beware! The 'new', reinvented Sid would then strut manfully through the sexual jungle of Sheffield.

I can see it now, Sid suited and booted, 'Um, er, you're a frightfully, er, attractive filly, er and I was just wondering if...' and the response; 'Oh my God! You're that weirdo off Crimewatch aren't you?!'...

Originally posted by slimsid2000
If I look or smile at a girl (either in a bar or just in an everyday situation - at bus stop etc) they either make little or no response, laugh or look disgusted.

Why do you think that might be, slimsid2000? Any ideas?

Originally posted by Captain_Scarlet
I know you do have a rather nice bum Nicola ;)

heehee thanks muffin!

Slimsid: Timo is right, but you have been given this advice on a numbr of other occasions and don't seem to have taken it.

I can only conclude that you don't actually want to get laid.

All the boy slim needs is a mullet, some man-tan and to get his ass down to t'gym. Easy.

Originally posted by skny
All the boy slim needs is a mullet, some man-tan and to get his ass down to t'gym. Easy.

A mullet?

I can only conclude that you don't want slimsid to get laid either!

:D

I have never see so many mullets in my life, as i have in sheffield. It's a mullet-a-rama down meadowhall way.

Originally posted by skny
I have never see so many mullets in my life, as i have in sheffield. It's a mullet-a-rama down meadowhall way.

I noticed this when I moved here! Its like the land where time stood still, except it managed to get stuck in the 80's and isnt full of dinosaurs! :help:

Originally posted by skny
I have never see so many mullets in my life, as i have in sheffield. It's a mullet-a-rama down meadowhall way.

don't tell them but they think that they are being cool :hihi:

Originally posted by Jamie
Why do you think that might be, slimsid2000? Any ideas?

they have taste!

Originally posted by skny
I have never see so many mullets in my life, as i have in sheffield. It's a mullet-a-rama down meadowhall way. Oh, you should visit Idaho! Mullets and cowboy hats, even the women have them - AND much bigger bums!

Originally posted by tulip
Oh, you should visit Idaho! Mullets and cowboy hats, even the women have them - AND much bigger bums!

I don't think the concept of mullets being a taboo ever reached middle America, did it?http://www.mulletjunky.com/states/id.htm

[QUOTE]Originally posted by panda79
im just happy that slimsid didnt use the american word for bottom as im sure the sex police would have arrested him by now:loopy: :loopy: :loopy: [/QUOTE

hello Panda79 its all well about men loving womens bums! but lookin at your pic think im a brest person myself! all im sayin is nice set:thumbsup:

Ah, open with a flirt - Good stuff! Welcome to the forum! :thumbsup:

By the way, here's that ' ] ' you're looking for... :)

Originally posted by slimsid2000
Is it just me or are other men really attracted to girls bottoms?

Perhaps I am a sex maniac:hihi: :hihi:

But what about the chest?? its first thing most men look at, and then once they walk off which happens to often(hummm) then yu look at the ass just to see what yu missin :thumbsup:

Originally posted by R_kid
[QUOTE]Originally posted by panda79
im just happy that slimsid didnt use the american word for bottom as im sure the sex police would have arrested him by now:loopy: :loopy: :loopy: [/QUOTE

hello Panda79 its all well about men loving womens bums! but lookin at your pic think im a brest person myself! all im sayin is nice set:thumbsup:

American words for bottom, now lessee:

tush, tushy, heiny, fanny, butt, ass, booty...

I am sure there are others, as Americans are obsessed with their asses, but can't think of any more right now

Does anyone remember the Les Dawson character Cosmo Smallpeice? He was a man who became obsessed with sex because he could never get any. His catchphrase was "knickers, knackers, knockers".

I sometime feel I may end up like him. :hihi: :hihi:

(Only joking)

Or you might end up like the guy in the famous Monty Python sketch featuring Eric Idle and Terry Jones.

Idle tries to engage Jones in a discussion about sex, peppering his sentences with risque and suggestive phrases and erotic inuendo. Finally, Idle says to Jones:

You have haven't you

Jones: What?

Idle: Had sex with a woman

Jones, Well, yes

Idle: Er, What's it like???

Tell me Lordcahvely, what is it like?:hihi:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
Tell me Lordcahvely, what is it like?:hihi:


No Lord Chaverly - don't tell him.. He needs to find out for himself. He'll get lazy again and not try to find a Mrs Slimsid

Slim Sid,
If you can remember Les Dawson's Cosmo Smallpiece character ['Knickers, knackers, knockers' etc], you must be fairly advanced in years. I think we should be told.

Originally posted by timo
Slim Sid,
If you can remember Les Dawson's Cosmo Smallpiece character ['Knickers, knackers, knockers' etc], you must be fairly advanced in years. I think we should be told. He said he was 35, I just remember Cosmo & I'm almost 39:suspect: I was too young to realise Cosmo was a 'pervert' in a classic dirty mac though:D

Originally posted by LordChaverly
American words for bottom, now lessee:

tush, tushy, heiny, fanny, butt, ass, booty...

I am sure there are others, as Americans are obsessed with their asses, but can't think of any more right now

i know zz top did a song called legs and part of the lyrics where shes legs up to her fanny and samuel jackson said in the remake of shaft (ooer missis ) its my duty to look after that booty:o

Originally posted by slimsid2000
Tell me Lordcahvely, what is it like?:hihi:

Slimsid,

I presume that by 'it’ you are referring to the deed variously described as ‘making the beast with two backs’ (Shakespeare); poking the eye which weeps most when its best pleased; dropping anchor in pee bay; playing the game of hide the sausage; or lancing the bearded clam.

Well Slimsid, I am pleased to provide you with the information you require, based on a lifetime of diligent primary and secondary empirical research. Since the tenor of your posts tend to indicate that your only current nocturnal (and indeed diurnal) activity is the sin of Onan, or to use a contemporary colloquialism, ‘spanking the monkey’, we will use this as a comparative indicator and point of reference (the fact that you appear to have difficulty in spelling my name correctly tends to indicate that your eyesight is already being affected by zealous overindulgence in this activity). To cut to the chase, in some cases and situations ‘it’ can be no better (and in fact a good deal worse and certainly more costly in all sorts of ways) than administering condign punishment to the said lower primate. In other cases and situations however, ‘it’ can be considerably more pleasing than the latter activity, in particular if the other party involved is a lithe, lissome, young filly with a soft, silky smooth skin and a lissome, lubricious, silky smooth … er I hesitate to go any further, for fear of inducing in you a vicarious thrill leading inevitably to further damage to your eyesight. On the other hand, if the object of your affections is, to put it bluntly, a raddled old boiler who is as rough and leathery as an old horse collar, then I think you will be well advised to stick to your current activity. There is in fact, something to be said for the latter, much maligned practice. Kingsley Amis once recounted a story about his friend Philip Larkin which is worth retelling. When at Oxford, Larkin apparently secured a hot date, involving wining and dining, with high expectations that ‘it’ would occur at the end of the evening. Anyway, just before he set off to meet the object of his desire, she rang him to cancel the date. Amis saw Larkin the next day and expected him to be really disappointed. Not at all, said Larkin. I had a **** instead, saved myself forty quid and had the evening to myself. There is also something to be said for celibacy, although in this regard I think the Pope (or perhaps Cliff Richard) would be better guides to, and advocates of, this particular alternative to ‘it’ than I could ever be (or indeed would ever want to be).

Originally posted by LordChaverly
Slimsid,

I presume that by 'it’ you are referring to the deed variously described as ‘making the beast with two backs’ (Shakespeare); poking the eye which weeps most when its best pleased; dropping anchor in pee bay; playing the game of hide the sausage; or lancing the bearded clam.

Well Slimsid, I am pleased to provide you with the information you require, based on a lifetime of diligent primary and secondary empirical research. Since the tenor of your posts tend to indicate that your only current nocturnal (and indeed diurnal) activity is the sin of Onan, or to use a contemporary colloquialism, ‘spanking the monkey’, we will use this as a comparative indicator and point of reference (the fact that you appear to have difficulty in spelling my name correctly tends to indicate that your eyesight is already being affected by zealous overindulgence in this activity). To cut to the chase, in some cases and situations ‘it’ can be no better (and in fact a good deal worse and certainly more costly in all sorts of ways) than administering condign punishment to the said lower primate. In other cases and situations however, ‘it’ can be considerably more pleasing than the latter activity, in particular if the other party involved is a lithe, lissome, young filly with a soft, silky smooth skin and a lissome, lubricious, silky smooth … er I hesitate to go any further, for fear of inducing in you a vicarious thrill leading inevitably to further damage to your eyesight. On the other hand, if the object of your affections is, to put it bluntly, a raddled old boiler who is as rough and leathery as an old horse collar, then I think you will be well advised to stick to your current activity. There is in fact, something to be said for the latter, much maligned practice. Kingsley Amis once recounted a story about his friend Philip Larkin which is worth retelling. When at Oxford, Larkin apparently secured a hot date, involving wining and dining, with high expectations that ‘it’ would occur at the end of the evening. Anyway, just before he set off to meet the object of his desire, she rang him to cancel the date. Amis saw Larkin the next day and expected him to be really disappointed. Not at all, said Larkin. I had a **** instead, saved myself forty quid and had the evening to myself. There is also something to be said for celibacy, although in this regard I think the Pope (or perhaps Cliff Richard) would be better guides to, and advocates of, this particular alternative to ‘it’ than I could ever be (or indeed would ever want to be).

:D :thumbsup:

I was in Corp on Friday dancing and it wasn't 2 busy. Turned round and 2 young girls were dancing in my personal space and wouldn't shift. A quick squeeze of the old bottom soon shifted them :D

This thread is still going? Wow, you forum fellas sure like a bit of arse.

:thumbsup:

Indeed we do, Sugarnspice. Mind you, isn't it nice that we don't just go for the obvious- large breasts? Like most heterosexual men, I like breasts too. However, the American ideal epitomised by Playboy models- huge breasts but a flat, tiny bottom is certainly not my idea of sexy. I think what Sid's thread, and a recent thread on preferred female body shape show, is that most men prefer curvaceous women with well-developed breasts and bottoms. Oh God. I feel ill with lust.

Lol. Very well put and extrememly informative. It is pleasing to hear that curves are the way to go.

:clap:

Originally posted by robbie
:D :thumbsup:

I was in Corp on Friday dancing and it wasn't 2 busy. Turned round and 2 young girls were dancing in my personal space and wouldn't shift. A quick squeeze of the old bottom soon shifted them :D

How did they react. Were they very annoyed? Did they slap you for your trouble or just move away?:hihi:

Originally posted by timo
Indeed we do, Sugarnspice. Mind you, isn't it nice that we don't just go for the obvious- large breasts? Like most heterosexual men, I like breasts too. However, the American ideal epitomised by Playboy models- huge breasts but a flat, tiny bottom is certainly not my idea of sexy. I think what Sid's thread, and a recent thread on preferred female body shape show, is that most men prefer curvaceous women with well-developed breasts and bottoms. Oh God. I feel ill with lust.

Yep. Borne out by a TV programme that was on at the weekend:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/sexsecrets/programmes.shtml#2

If you didn't see it, the not very surprising conclusion was that women like tall rich men, and, yes, men like curvy women (as quantified by hip-to-waist ratio in particular).

I have a theory that the reason why there are quite a lot of thin supermodels etc. is that many of the men involved in fashion are gay, and like their women to look a bit like boys. [Lots of exceptions too of course e.g. Claudia Schiffer.]

Originally posted by CaptainSwing
Yep. Borne out by a TV programme that was on at the weekend:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/sexsecrets/programmes.shtml#2

If you didn't see it, the not very surprising conclusion was that women like tall rich men, and, yes, men like curvy women (as quantified by hip-to-waist ratio in particular).

I have a theory that the reason why there are quite a lot of thin supermodels etc. is that many of the men involved in fashion are gay, and like their women to look a bit like boys. [Lots of exceptions too of course e.g. Claudia Schiffer.]

Is David Beckham a little bit gay? Er, perhaps not. Rebecca Loos is quite curvaceous, if I remember rightly.

I think if you study ideal body types throughout history as represented in visual art, there is a remarkable similarity across a wide range of cultures. The V shape predominates in representations of men and the curvy shape for women (a little like an hour glass, but not too much so).

Originally posted by LordChaverly
Is David Beckham a little bit gay? Er, perhaps not. Rebecca Loos is quite curvaceous, if I remember rightly.

Rebecca Loos and Abi Titmuss were the only two reasons that I watched Celebrity Love Island, for anthropological reasons obviously.

does this mean you're thinking about doing it? :gag:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
How did they react. Were they very annoyed? Did they slap you for your trouble or just move away?:hihi:

I'd love to but don't have the courage to go through with it.

Lord Chaverly's cogent point about the historical representation of ideal bodily types in the medium of visual art, has echoes in actual global, cultural preferences today. The global trend is towards a preference for the fuller female figure.

I have heard the view, expressed by Capt Swing [how are the Luddites, by the way?] that homosexual fashion designers are responsible for the 'boyish' look of catwalk models ventured many a time before. I have been tempted to think so too. However, many gay men seem to have a fondness for the likes of Fern Brittan and Dawn French, whose ampleness might be considered a little too much by many heterosexual British men, though they would doubtless ignite Abu Dhabi and Marakesh.

At any rate, we have established that we like our women, generally speaking, the way they are. That includes their 'arses', dear Sugarnspice....xxx

I have 'goosed' many a fair maiden on the tube in London on my way to work.

Always prepared to turn round and blame a male just disembarking.

Many have received the finger, and much more on my behalf.

some girls like it so I wouldn't worry too much if I were you...they'll take it as a compliment! Bootilicious :heyhey:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I'd love to but don't have the courage to go through with it.

a finger of fudge presumably..... :gag:

Originally posted by BoppinBruce
I have 'goosed' many a fair maiden on the tube in London on my way to work.

Always prepared to turn round and blame a male just disembarking.

Many have received the finger, and much more on my behalf.

I'd like to hear from some female members on this one. Do you really like it from a man you have never met?

Sounds doubtful to me.:confused:

are we still talking about you groping their bums?

Many girls have fantasies, so that could well be part of one...If they don't like it they'll soon let you know...LIVE DANGEROUSLY!!

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I'd like to hear from some female members on this one. Do you really like it from a man you have never met?

Sounds doubtful to me.:confused:

Well, I have been goosed by ladies, front and rear, and every one was an enjoyable experience.

What does 'goosed' mean?

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I'd like to hear from some female members on this one. Do you really like it from a man you have never met?

Sounds doubtful to me.:confused:


Don't know about that. If it was some terrible scabby old man I would be livid but then again, if I turned around to see that the pincher-of-rear was a tall handsome fireman in uniform, I'd LOVE it.

:confused:

Originally posted by sugarnspice
Don't know about that. If it was some terrible scabby old man I would be livid but then again, if I turned around to see that the pincher-of-rear was a tall handsome fireman in uniform, I'd LOVE it.

:confused:

how about if the pincher was me?

Originally posted by sugarnspice
Don't know about that. If it was some terrible scabby old man I would be livid but then again, if I turned around to see that the pincher-of-rear was a tall handsome fireman in uniform, I'd LOVE it.

:confused:

Even if he was holding his hose at the time?

Oh yes, especially. But that's enough about that. I don't want to be feeling this giddy in the early afternoon.

Originally posted by Jamie
What does 'goosed' mean?

Oxford English Dictionary says:

goose, v. 5. slang. To poke, tickle, etc., (a person) in a sensitive part, esp. the genital or anal regions; sometimes, more specifically, = f*** ... 1967 PARTRIDGE Dict. Slang Suppl. 1152/2 Goose, the predominant post-World War II meaning is ‘to jab a finger in ano, in order to surprise or annoy’.

I'm shocked !!

People actually do that to each other on the tube !!???!?

:confused:

It's better than what's been happening on there lately. Would rather be "goosed" than blown to pieces.

But anyway .... back to lovely ladies bums, fellas.......

Originally posted by CaptainSwing
I have a theory that the reason why there are quite a lot of thin supermodels etc. is that many of the men involved in fashion are gay, and like their women to look a bit like boys. [Lots of exceptions too of course e.g. Claudia Schiffer.]

Sorry to scotch your theory but the reason most models look like they do is simply that the clothes look better on that type of figure. I have friends in the fashion trade who have remarked on this many times. Also you might find that a lot of gay man in fashion and indeed elsewhere much prefer a more masculine looking partner. They prefer men not a woman that looks like a boy.

I hate having my bottom pinched :mad:

Think about how you would like it, boys, if you felt your arse being pinched and you turned around and there was a guy stronger, bigger than you with a leery expectant smile.

I have been known to shout pretty loud about it. I don't believe in pouring drinks over people as it is a waste of good alcohol.

Originally posted by pete_jim
Sorry to scotch your theory but the reason most models look like they do is simply that the clothes look better on that type of figure. I have friends in the fashion trade who have remarked on this many times. Also you might find that a lot of gay man in fashion and indeed elsewhere much prefer a more masculine looking partner. They prefer men not a woman that looks like a boy.

Probably digging myself into a deeper hole, but aren't clothes supposed to make people look good, rather than the other way around? Or put another way, maybe there's some reason why fashion designers design clothes that look good on unusually thin women, as opposed to women that men on the whole find more attractive?

Or maybe this is something specific to fashion, rather than clothes in general - have to admit that my interest in fashion is precisely zip, so my knowledge of it is pretty limited. I haven't really got a concept of clothes looking good in themselves, as opposed to being wrapped round somebody.

[And yes I'm sure you're right that many gay men prefer masculine-looking partners - I guess I was just suggesting that they might not like feminine-looking women so much, aesthetically.]

Originally posted by sugarnspice
It's better than what's been happening on there lately. Would rather be "goosed" than blown to pieces.

But anyway .... back to lovely ladies bums, fellas.......

:D Thats a good point
I think ill use that as my defence if I ever "goose" someone. Thanks for that!!

Originally posted by Duffer
:D Thats a good point
I think ill use that as my defence if I ever "goose" someone. Thanks for that!!

Tee hee, you're welcome x

Originally posted by Jamie
I'm shocked !!

People actually do that to each other on the tube !!???!?

:confused:

In New York its called grabassing.

I remember when I was living there the NYPD had a blitz on grabassing on the subway, leading to the startling tabloid headline 'Grabassers Nabbed On Subway'.

You really shouldn't grab ladies bums. You could get yourself into a lot of trouble. She maybe totally offended and accuse you of sexual assault or have a 6' 4 boyfriend. Not a good idea at all. I would think most girls would be unhappy at the very least to have their bum grabbed by a complete stranger:)

Originally posted by tulip
You really shouldn't grab ladies bums. You could get yourself into a lot of trouble. She maybe totally offended and accuse you of sexual assault or have a 6' 4 boyfriend. Not a good idea at all. I would think most girls would be unhappy at the very least to have their bum grabbed by a complete stranger:)

I agree tulip. It's so disrespectful aswell, it does my head in. I think it is classed as sexual assult isn't it?? I can't think of anyone who would take it as a compliment. Fair doos, some of my mates do it to me, but if a stranger does it really makes me angry :rant:

As they say you can look but dont touch,still its always nice to have a sneaky look.:hihi:

Originally posted by royjames
As they say you can look but dont touch,still its always nice to have a sneaky look.:hihi:

I believe its also referred to as Window Shopping ;)

So I'm told :suspect:

I don't think there is anything wrong with looking as long as it's not leering and you aren't doing it blatantly to make a partner jealous, I hate it when men do that especially when the partner blames the person he's leering at!:o

I would advise men not to pinch womens' bottoms, however enticingly rounded and firm they may be. Nowadays, the police forces concentrate upon extremely serious crimes such as 'goosing', stealing birds eggs, smoking on buses etc, rather than the less important crimes such as murder, rape, kidnapping and burglary. One might find oneself arrested in a dawn raid upon suspected bottom pinchers, 'goosers', pinchers and tweakers by armed police in helicopters. Life in Blair's 'new', 'young' Britain is a vale of tears.

You might be put on the sex offenders register for life , just for one drunken pinch of a peachy bum. Shame, oh the shame!

I remember being in flares last year and on my way to the toilet my bum got pinched 5 times by differant women!!! i didn't know what to do (apart from smile of course!!)

Yes, if you want to pinch some booty SlimSid try Flares or maybe Yates, given the clientele I'm sure they'd be pleasantly surprised by anyone who grabbed their rump... :heyhey:

Originally posted by scottf
I remember being in flares last year and on my way to the toilet my bum got pinched 5 times by differant women!!! i didn't know what to do (apart from smile of course!!)

You would probably need 2 hands though!!!

Perhaps we should relabel it from 'goosing' to 'rumping'?

yes indeed!

Tho' it would be a risk free environment for SlimSid to experiment within...well it would be a start anyway. Expectation of Flares given those who go there is pretty much "set your standards low and be prepared to drop them"...... :hihi:

Originally posted by scottf
You would probably need 2 hands though!!!

I take offence to your comments about Flares - hehehe, a girlfriend and I usually end up in there and we are not bad at all. Not being big headed, just what we've been told!

Although much of the clientelle has been hit with the ugly stick!

I'll stop being rude about people now!

Originally posted by slimsid2000
How did they react. Were they very annoyed? Did they slap you for your trouble or just move away?:hihi:

mate I pinch the bottom of the one who wasn't interested in me. Neevr seen someone move so quickly. Certainly a way to shift girls. I wouldn';t recommend it as part of your chat up routine though

sorry if I offended, I was generalising, there are a few decent lookers, but only a few!

Many of the "ladies" in there are old, fat, ugly and just after some "young meat" tho'....don't u agree?

It's not bad for a cheesy nite (ok then half an hour, before going somewhere else) once in a while, but it's pretty much the same old same old every time... :gag:

Originally posted by BruciesBabe
I take offence to your comments about Flares - hehehe, a girlfriend and I usually end up in there and we are not bad at all. Not being big headed, just what we've been told!

Although much of the clientelle has been hit with the ugly stick!

I'll stop being rude about people now!

Originally posted by BoppinBruce
Well, I have been goosed by ladies, front and rear, and every one was an enjoyable experience.

I don't mind being goosed by females. They are either mucking around or take it as a compliment. Unless they are overly persistent and ressemble the back of a bus:D

Yes bertie u are right i have to admit - there are a few lovely ladies in there, but then we get the letchy ******** grabbing various biys of our anatomies, which can be fun if ure in the right frame of mind!

As for the same old tune etc - yes again u are right, but its always a wicked laugh too.

Originally posted by CherryNicole
I agree tulip. It's so disrespectful aswell, it does my head in. I think it is classed as sexual assult isn't it?? I can't think of anyone who would take it as a compliment. Fair doos, some of my mates do it to me, but if a stranger does it really makes me angry :rant:

totally agree. It's out of order how some lads go around grabbing girls. It is more groping than goosing. its is sexual harrasment.

Originally posted by BruciesBabe
[B]but then we get the letchy ******** grabbing various biys of our anatomies, which can be fun if ure in the right frame of mind![B]

I wouldn't describe myself as a letch.. just a refined drunk at the time ;)

*ps hope you were making reference to me there :suspect: I am fully of aware of a problem with my hands when I'm drunk!

No reference to u at all Deej, u know I love it!

any girls that wish to feel my buttocks are more than welcome any day. I don't understand why girls don't appreciate it the same? :)

*BTW I speak as someone who has never pinched a bottom.

and what does Brucie think to it...? PMSL :heyhey:

Originally posted by BruciesBabe
Yes bertie u are right i have to admit - there are a few lovely ladies in there, but then we get the letchy ******** grabbing various biys of our anatomies, which can be fun if ure in the right frame of mind!

As for the same old tune etc - yes again u are right, but its always a wicked laugh too.

I don't have issues with people pinching my bottom, I do however have issues with men grabbing my frontage! thats one step too far methinks.

There is no brucey, bertie, well that is, I wudn't have thought that Mr Springsteen wud have an opinion!

so as long as they take you from behind you don't mind....OK! :heyhey:

Originally posted by BruciesBabe
I don't have issues with people pinching my bottom, I do however have issues with men grabbing my frontage! thats one step too far methinks.

I cudn't possibly comment Bertie!

take that as an implied yes then....:heyhey:

Originally posted by BruciesBabe
I cudn't possibly comment Bertie!

sorry, had visions of Bruce Forsyth and Tess Daly for some reason.... :hihi:

Originally posted by BruciesBabe
There is no brucey, bertie, well that is, I wudn't have thought that Mr Springsteen wud have an opinion!

No, just the boss.

As for the implied yes.... no comment!

two "no comments" looks like a pattern to me... :wink:

Originally posted by BruciesBabe
No, just the boss.

As for the implied yes.... no comment!

Wudn't want to give anything away!

wouldn't ask u to... :wink:

Originally posted by BruciesBabe
I don't have issues with people pinching my bottom, I do however have issues with men grabbing my frontage! thats one step too far methinks.

I'd love to pinch your bottom.:hihi:

even tho' you presumably don't know what she looks like, or equally importantly in this case what Bruciebabe's bum is like.... :heyhey:

getting personal here!

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I'd love to pinch your bottom.:hihi:

I've heard she is very nice looking. Yes, I don't know what her bum is like but I like so many girl's bums that it is reasonable to assume I would like hers.

BTW, I do like girls generally not just their bums. I am not a complete sex maniac.:hihi:

Originally posted by slimsid2000
I've heard she is very nice looking. Yes, I don't know what her bum is like but I like so many girl's bums that it is reasonable to assume I would like hers.

BTW, I do like girls generally not just their bums. I am not a complete sex maniac.:hihi:
I think Brucie would have something to say about that

Originally posted by tulip
I don't think there is anything wrong with looking as long as it's not leering and you aren't doing it blatantly to make a partner jealous, I hate it when men do that especially when the partner blames the person he's leering at!:o

One of the first things a guy should learn when he is with his partner is not to exclaim 'God, look at the arse on that!' when a well-upholstered young lady walks by. Your partner is most unlikely to share your enthusiasm. Another thing a guy should avoid when with a partner is talking about his previous conquests. Again, the partner is unlikely to appreciate it. Ah well, most of us learn eventually.

Originally posted by slimsid2000
Yes, I don't know what her bum is like

I could comment but she'd probably slap me in the pub when I see her :hihi:

Originally posted by LordChaverly
One of the first things a guy should learn when he is with his partner is not to exclaim 'God, look at the arse on that!' when a well-upholstered young lady walks by. Your partner is most unlikely to share your enthusiasm.

Instead he should learn to think 'God, look at the arse on that!' an sneak a crafty peek, while his partner isn't looking.

Not that most men already do that or anything!

Originally posted by LordChaverly
One of the first things a guy should learn when he is with his partner is not to exclaim 'God, look at the arse on that!' when a well-upholstered young lady walks by. Your partner is most unlikely to share your enthusiasm. Another thing a guy should avoid when with a partner is talking about his previous conquests. Again, the partner is unlikely to appreciate it. Ah well, most of us learn eventually.

It is a fact that the number of pretty young fillies in one's vicinity increases dramatically when a partner is present. Quite a strange thing, really. To prevent spousal admonishment on a pleasant day out, I suggest the wearing of sunglasses; the eyes, as they say, are the gateway to the soul!

Of course, the Holy Grail of womankind is the partner who does indeed "share your enthusiasm" in the admiration of the female of the species. Alas, I'm no Indiana Jones :(

Originally posted by Greenback
To prevent spousal admonishment on a pleasant day out, I suggest the wearing of sunglasses

"Stealth glasses" as my mate used to call them.

Originally posted by Greenback
It is a fact that the number of pretty young fillies in one's vicinity increases dramatically when a partner is present. Quite a strange thing, really. To prevent spousal admonishment on a pleasant day out, I suggest the wearing of sunglasses; the eyes, as they say, are the gateway to the soul!

Of course, the Holy Grail of womankind is the partner who does indeed "share your enthusiasm" in the admiration of the female of the species. Alas, I'm no Indiana Jones :(

So the Holy Grail would be a bisexual nympho with the prospect of threesomes in the offing.

The grass always tends to be greener, not least because of the human males' polygamous tendencies. A short poem explains the differences (generally speaking) between men and women in this regard.

Hogamous, hygamous, men are polygamous
Hygamous, homagous, women are monogomous.

Put more crudely and coloqiually, in his heart of hearts, the only time a man really wants to **** the same woman twice is just before he's ****** her once. What a cynical old cove I am.

Originally posted by LordChaverly


Put more crudely and coloqiually, in his heart of hearts, the only time a man really wants to **** the same woman twice is just before he's ****** her once. What a cynical old cove I am.

That'd make a smashing message for inside a birthday card, for the wife ofcause.

For anyone thinking of sending such a card to the other half, an opened suitcase with some personal belongings might be a very good idea to have at the ready.

Originally posted by Ousetunes
That'd make a smashing message for inside a birthday card, for the wife ofcause.

For anyone thinking of sending such a card to the other half, an opened suitcase with some personal belongings might be a very good idea to have at the ready.

Yes, I agree. Keep this thought well away from your mouth when you are with your partner.

Originally posted by Ousetunes
That'd make a smashing message for inside a birthday card, for the wife ofcause.

Coffee/screen interface. That's made my day, that has :D

I am not really a bum man , but isnt it strange that men are attracted to a bum that they really cant see, ie covered by trousers or skirts etc.
It all comes down to fantasy and imagination.
The bum underneath may not be as you think if you had chance to see it bear,but something inside your mind is saying"corr! thats a nice un!".
Maybe the girl has just walked out of a toilet in a curryhouse with no paper left in the lavs.

Originally posted by LordChaverly

Put more crudely and coloqiually, in his heart of hearts, the only time a man really wants to **** the same woman twice is just before he's ****** her once. What a cynical old cove I am.

Do you think that's true :(

I get to work where there are loads of men and I have to say, i love to see what their bums look like. You can tell such a lot from the back, mostly matches the front when they turn round.

To be honest, I had had an attraction to big beautiful ladies and naturally love large heavy bottoms in a woman, hehe

So I do not see any inappropriateness in the author's personal preference. I am just wondering if there are some guys who are in favor of a large girl as much as I like. I am sorry for shifting the topic to another slightly different one but still very much looking forward to your opinions. cheers

Originally posted by kathythebean
Do you think that's true :(

Well kathy, like many similar statements it is an exaggeration, but it probably contains more than a grain of truth. I think it is well documented that generally speaking men tend to be polygamous by nature, as indeed are the males of many other species. There could be a socio-biological explanation for it, in that if a fundamental instinct is to procreate in order to pass on our genes, then men have infinitely greater capability than women in this regard. For example, it would be biologically possible for a man to impregnate by natural means several women a day, every day, for the duration of his potency (probably at least 50 years). Conversely, women can only procreate one every nine months, and for a much shorter period. Ths is perhaps why women generally speaking are much fussier about who they mate with than men (not least also because the socio-biological costs of giving birth and child rearing are so much higher. I suppose the nearest manifestations of the sentiment contained in the statement are all powerful rulers with hundreds of wives. For most men, such opportunities do not present themselves and their are other contraints which prevent them from proving or disproving this statement.

Not only are there sociobiological explanations for polygamy, there are also explanations [some feminists have called them excuses] for rape along the same lines. The general idea is that human males possess the instincts to procreate, and the urge towards genetic replication is so powerful as to outweigh any socially-constructed moral codes. Some theorists have extended the theory to mass rape in wartime. Not surprisingly, these theories are deeply unpopular with mainstream social scientists, who tend to dismiss the idea of biological causality and instincts. Feminists generally tend to dislike 'biological determinism' too, and have argued, as suggested before, that sociobioogical explication gives 'patriarchal agents' free licence to excuse rape as inevitable, 'natural' primate behaviour. Religious types tend to dislike such theories too, as they ultimately suggest that human beings are nothing more than evolved African apes, and our world consists of blind, physical forces and genetic replication.

Arguably, the sociobiological view neglects agency. Human males may inherit a predisposition towards procreation, and there is most definately something almost savage about male sexuality. Nevertheless, we have the agency, the ability to formulate and act upon decisions, and we can 'stop ourselves' from engaging in sexual assault and rape. That is, of course, unless our brains are subject to neuro-chemical imbalance, or we fall under the spectrum of sociopathy. The latter two cases tend to blur things a tad...

Originally posted by timo
Not only are there sociobiological explanations for polygamy, there are also explanations [some feminists have called them excuses] for rape along the same lines. The general idea is that human males possess the instincts to procreate, and the urge towards genetic replication is so powerful as to outweigh any socially-constructed moral codes. Some theorists have extended the theory to mass rape in wartime. Not surprisingly, these theories are deeply unpopular with mainstream social scientists, who tend to dismiss the idea of biological causality and instincts. Feminists generally tend to dislike 'biological determinism' too, and have argued, as suggested before, that sociobioogical explication gives 'patriarchal agents' free licence to excuse rape as inevitable, 'natural' primate behaviour. Religious types tend to dislike such theories too, as they ultimately suggest that human beings are nothing more than evolved African apes, and our world consists of blind, physical forces and genetic replication.

Arguably, the sociobiological view neglects agency. Human males may inherit a predisposition towards procreation, and there is most definately something almost savage about male sexuality. Nevertheless, we have the agency, the ability to formulate and act upon decisions, and we can 'stop ourselves' from engaging in sexual assault and rape. That is, of course, unless our brains are subject to neuro-chemical imbalance, or we fall under the spectrum of sociopathy. The latter two cases tend to blur things a tad...

Excellent post Timo. I agree with you about the importance of agency in human affairs. In its crudest forms, biological determinism is no more convincing as a complete explanation of human behaviour than economic determinism. Socio-biology though does in my view provide us with many useful insights, not least into the mainsprings of male and female sexuality.

Originally posted by kathythebean
Do you think that's true :( I know I can't answer for men but I personally don't think that lordc's generalization is true. I used to have a low opinion of men but I was told off by a bloke once for saying they were all the same and would go after women as conquests just to prove they could. He told me when blokes were in a group they thought they had to act in a certain way otherwise they'd be ridiculed by the rest of the group. He said it was a really bad position to be in because he would like to stand up and say 'we don't have to chase everything in a skirt' but couldn't bring himself to do it. I suppose it comes across as acting like sheep but if leering is expected by their mates then they go along with it. I'm not saying groups of women leer after men but personally I wouldn't feel I had to join in for fear of being told by my mates I was a lesbian.

I wonder if any other men on here would agree with this and say 'I love my partner and wouldn't do anything to jeopardize our relationship'?????

The days of 'having to get married' are long gone. It is usually the man who wants marriage. In most cases they would have slept together before the wedding so if what the loverly Lord.C says is true - why do they get hitched/live with a woman?

Also the woman is just as likely to cheat on their partner as the man. So I can't agree with this statement at all ;)

Sorry M'Lord, beggin ya pardin:P

Originally posted by rosie
I get to work where there are loads of men and I have to say, i love to see what their bums look like. You can tell such a lot from the back, mostly matches the front when they turn round.

what job have you got ?! a job looking at bums or did i mis-intepret that!

I find it really interesting how we still stereotype people to such a great degree. Not sure where the other posters acquired their information esp Lord C. It was my wife who wanted to get married, though I did suggest the engagement before that. I have nothing against marriage as long as it is done for the right reasons, and that when a couple get married they realise they are man and wife - two parts of a whole set to help each other and to work together through good times and bad.

The idea that men act in a pack mentality concerning women seems pretty lfar fetched though I can only comment from a personal perpective from what I see of those people around me. Yes - when there are a group of males they may utter comments that they would otherwise only think, but that does not imply they would act out those comments so - "I wouldn't mind spending a hour with her" does not equate to actually being willing to do so. It is more a weird way of commenting on the females attractiveness - albeit there are better ways to say it. Just another of those weird measuring stciks men use.

No single part of the anatomy can have preference over the others - realistically speaking. You may begin by loving someone cos they have a lovely bum, but after a short while you notice the major faults you did not previously pay attention to and this causes those breaks in relationships.

I have never ever 'dumped' a partner as I am a believer that if you are going to get involved, then you work at any problems that arise thereafter and pay the consequences without simply running away. Maybe I am just a weirdo?

The question was originally viewed by me as being tongue-in-cheek rather than a serious question, but it seems to have veered into more murky waters. We have to stop generalising and stop taking words that are spoken at their face value regardless of the circumstances in which they were uttered.

Be that as it may - I have no preference for any part of another persons anatomy, but view the person as a whole - both physically and, given the opportunity, the type of person they are inside. A job looking at bums would be pretty boring after a very short time, and I am not sure how a persons bum can match their front???

Dragon

Originally posted by kathythebean
Do you think that's true :(

not strictly no.

I think its probably closer to the truth to say that no matter how happy a man is in a relationship they will always look at other women and become turned on by them and fantasise about them.

Remember men also tend to lean towards the tendancy to be jealous and possesive.

I think 'turned on' and 'fantasize' are a bit strong. I have never fantasized or become turned on by someone other than my partner - hand on heart. Like I said before - maybe I am just a freak?

Guess it all depends as well on what you view as being 'turned on'?

Dragon

Originally posted by Bedhead
what job have you got ?! a job looking at bums or did i mis-intepret that! She is a professional interviewer for a high power powered company, didn't she make that clear? She recommends men for highly important jobs based purely on what their bums look like, all women do this - didn't you know?:P

Originally posted by Dragon
I find it really interesting how we still stereotype people to such a great degree. Not sure where the other posters acquired their information esp Lord C. It was my wife who wanted to get married, though I did suggest the engagement before that. I have nothing against marriage as long as it is done for the right reasons, and that when a couple get married they realise they are man and wife - two parts of a whole set to help each other and to work together through good times and bad.

The idea that men act in a pack mentality concerning women seems pretty lfar fetched though I can only comment from a personal perpective from what I see of those people around me. Yes - when there are a group of males they may utter comments that they would otherwise only think, but that does not imply they would act out those comments so - "I wouldn't mind spending a hour with her" does not equate to actually being willing to do so. It is more a weird way of commenting on the females attractiveness - albeit there are better ways to say it. Just another of those weird measuring stciks men use.

No single part of the anatomy can have preference over the others - realistically speaking. You may begin by loving someone cos they have a lovely bum, but after a short while you notice the major faults you did not previously pay attention to and this causes those breaks in relationships.

I have never ever 'dumped' a partner as I am a believer that if you are going to get involved, then you work at any problems that arise thereafter and pay the consequences without simply running away. Maybe I am just a weirdo?

The question was originally viewed by me as being tongue-in-cheek rather than a serious question, but it seems to have veered into more murky waters. We have to stop generalising and stop taking words that are spoken at their face value regardless of the circumstances in which they were uttered.

Be that as it may - I have no preference for any part of another persons anatomy, but view the person as a whole - both physically and, given the opportunity, the type of person they are inside. A job looking at bums would be pretty boring after a very short time, and I am not sure how a persons bum can match their front???

Dragon Good, that is more like it! I think it would be a horrible world if two people fall in love, get married and spend the rest of their lives drooling over complete strangers! Now I think your opinion is more of the norm!

Originally posted by timo
Not only are there sociobiological explanations for polygamy, there are also explanations [some feminists have called them excuses] for rape along the same lines. The general idea is that human males possess the instincts to procreate, and the urge towards genetic replication is so powerful as to outweigh any socially-constructed moral codes. Some theorists have extended the theory to mass rape in wartime. Not surprisingly, these theories are deeply unpopular with mainstream social scientists, who tend to dismiss the idea of biological causality and instincts. Feminists generally tend to dislike 'biological determinism' too, and have argued, as suggested before, that sociobioogical explication gives 'patriarchal agents' free licence to excuse rape as inevitable, 'natural' primate behaviour. Religious types tend to dislike such theories too, as they ultimately suggest that human beings are nothing more than evolved African apes, and our world consists of blind, physical forces and genetic replication.

Arguably, the sociobiological view neglects agency. Human males may inherit a predisposition towards procreation, and there is most definately something almost savage about male sexuality. Nevertheless, we have the agency, the ability to formulate and act upon decisions, and we can 'stop ourselves' from engaging in sexual assault and rape. That is, of course, unless our brains are subject to neuro-chemical imbalance, or we fall under the spectrum of sociopathy. The latter two cases tend to blur things a tad... Now, were did this nonsense come from, Patients in Broadmoor!

Women are supposedly predisposed to search out the ideal parner to have sex with to produce the perfect baby. I also think that is nonsense. Otherwise, why would women marry men like Woody Allen!!! No, sorry, it doesn't make sense.

All these 'studies by men/women in labrarorities' don't impress me at all - it is just personal opinion.

I don't believe men are any more predisposed to procreation than women. We are all individuals with different ideals.

Why are some people gay? That has nothing to do with producing the most babies, does it? Granted the 'majority' of people are heterosexual but that doesn't mean there are aren't millions of non-hetrosexual people in this world and just like hetrosexual couples, some gay people are monogamous and others are promiscuous.

I think it has more to do with selfishness than genetics and a disregard for your fellow woman/man. If all people wanted wanted to do was produce offspring then why would anyone use contraception? If your animal instincs take over then child support would not even enter your head and condoms would be thrown through the window:suspect:

Interesting replies!

The question I asked was very serious but proffered in a flush of vulnerability regarding the adequacy of my own bottom (with respect to the prospects of keeping the other half away from the rumps of all the other summer fillies) and would probably have been better left ignored :blush:

Originally posted by kathythebean
Interesting replies!

The question I asked was very serious but proffered in a flush of vulnerability regarding the adequacy of my own bottom (with respect to the prospects of keeping the other half away from the rumps of all the other summer fillies) and would probably have been better left ignored :blush: I don't agree Kathy. Your bottom is not inadequate! If he looks at other girls bums, slap him! Men are coming out of their macho dessing rooms now. They don't have to pretend on here that looking at other women is important. If I know men at all they are very unobservant, they are more likely to look at cars! My other half is always critcizing other drivers but 9 times out of ten he will say 'look how that other guy is driving, the maniac!' a lot of the time it's a woman driver!:thumbsup: That is not to say women drivers are bad, but women rule supreme in this State and probably don't allow their men to drive. I keep telling Mr. Tulip how lucky he is to have an English wife but apart from being unobservant he also has cotton wool in his ears:heyhey: x

Unfortunately this is true of us - being unobservant to a degree. Not many men actually notice you have had your hair done until you wave it in their faces. Its just the way we are. The important thing is how we feel about the person we are with, and that has little to do with the lass walking down the street in the short skirt with the big boobs.

Married men only seem to do that to get a response from other men - wahaaay he's still one of the lads.

Lots of men look, but most think how fortunate they are for the female by their side rather than the probably short relationship they could have with some marriage wrecker.

Hey ho!

Dragon

I've always liked shapely female bottoms:clap:

Originally posted by Trekker
I've always liked shapely female bottoms:clap:


Mine's shapely too!

Unfortunately it's no longer the right shape...:(

lol.. poor old you:hihi:

Tulip,
The 'nonsense' from 'patients in Broadmoor' you refer to, is by various sociobiologists. There is no need to pathologise people just because you disagree with them. I don't agree with the theories one hundred per cent either. Please have some manners when dealing with other posters. I find your vulgar tone offensive.

Originally posted by kathythebean
Interesting replies!

The question I asked was very serious but proffered in a flush of vulnerability regarding the adequacy of my own bottom (with respect to the prospects of keeping the other half away from the rumps of all the other summer fillies) and would probably have been better left ignored :blush: Surely, if your other half ‘truly’ loved you then the temptation of the tender, subtle rear of the ‘summer fillies,’ would have no attraction for someone with only ‘eyes for you.’ I’ve only loved one person once. And still, years after it is over, I can still see no one else but her……

Originally posted by sonofman
Surely, if your other half ‘truly’ loved you then the temptation of the tender, subtle rear of the ‘summer fillies,’ would have no attraction for someone with only ‘eyes for you.’ I’ve only loved one person once. And still, years after it is over, I can still see no one else but her……

Its more my paranoia than his behaviour. He is faithful and loving - yes I have never had it so good.

But I do despair sometimes as I am often told by male friends/forum members that even though I may think he only lusts for me, I'm definitely mistaken as all men fanatsize about other women etc.

Like I said though I posted that in a moment of doubt and vulnerability, and the vast majority of the time I walk around swinging my ass with pride :)

Originally posted by kathythebean
the vast majority of the time I walk around swinging my ass with pride :) Was that you?:wow:

Originally posted by sonofman
Was that you?:wow:

ack tried to say no and post a picture of a donkey saying 'this is my ass' but it didn't work. never mind.

Originally posted by timo
Tulip,
The 'nonsense' from 'patients in Broadmoor' you refer to, is by various sociobiologists. There is no need to pathologise people just because you disagree with them. I don't agree with the theories one hundred per cent either. Please have some manners when dealing with other posters. I find your vulgar tone offensive.

Quite so Timo. To indirectly describe someone of the calibre of Edward O. Wilson, who is one of the greatest biologists of this or any other age, and a truly original thinker, as 'suitable for Broadmoor', is indeed worthy of contempt.

Originally posted by Dragon
I think 'turned on' and 'fantasize' are a bit strong. I have never fantasized or become turned on by someone other than my partner - hand on heart. Like I said before - maybe I am just a freak?

Guess it all depends as well on what you view as being 'turned on'?

Dragon

Dragon,

If you are male i would suggest you are unusual in this regard. I remember Jimmy Carter, then president of the US, admitted that he had 'commited adultery in his heart'. He got a lot of stick for it at the time from the US press, but in my view he was just being honest, if unwisely so in the circumstances. I can't see its such a big deal. Humans fantasise about lots of things and always will.

Originally posted by tulip
Now, were did this nonsense come from, Patients in Broadmoor!

Women are supposedly predisposed to search out the ideal parner to have sex with to produce the perfect baby. I also think that is nonsense. Otherwise, why would women marry men like Woody Allen!!! No, sorry, it doesn't make sense.

All these 'studies by men/women in labrarorities' don't impress me at all - it is just personal opinion.

I don't believe men are any more predisposed to procreation than women. We are all individuals with different ideals.

Why are some people gay? That has nothing to do with producing the most babies, does it? Granted the 'majority' of people are heterosexual but that doesn't mean there are aren't millions of non-hetrosexual people in this world and just like hetrosexual couples, some gay people are monogamous and others are promiscuous.

I think it has more to do with selfishness than genetics and a disregard for your fellow woman/man. If all people wanted wanted to do was produce offspring then why would anyone use contraception? If your animal instincs take over then child support would not even enter your head and condoms would be thrown through the window:suspect: I am sorry If this sounded paronizing, it wasn't meant to, honestly! It's just my opinion not an attempt to have a go at you personally.

I apologize for any offence this caused.

Lord. C. I wasn't having a go at you either, I was just messing around. So sorry to you too. I am always saying the wrong thing and upsetting someone. I must be very tactless without realizing it:help:

Wahaaay I am a freak. But why would I need to look at other peoples bottoms if I truly believe the one that belongs to my partner is better than all the rest. It aint going to be perfect for everyone. Lots of people would see my partners rear as too large or too small, too soft or too firm. Like I really care? For me it is perfect and there is no need to admire another persons. Same goes for the rest of her.

It is an altogether different thing for me to comment on another females physique in that by doing so I am not thinking of any personal involvement but of how others may see her. I may see a bottom and think that is what I would consider too large or too small or too fat or too muscled. I can think that because my partner has the perfect one for me. The same applies to the rest of her anatomy.

If that makes me a freak then fine. I used to enjoy watching drew barrimore but not because I fancied her or even considered her figure any better than my partners. When I saw Shakira and thought she was attractive - it was not in comparison to the perfection of my partner.

So - there are men out there who do not look longingly at another forsaking their partner.

So ther you go. Nothing wrong with looking or admiring - unless you ahve a partner who should have your undivided attention. Outisde and in - you chose her or him cos they are the right person ffor you and not just some fly-by-night.

Dragon

Originally posted by Dragon
Wahaaay I am a freak. But why would I need to look at other peoples bottoms if I truly believe the one that belongs to my partner is better than all the rest. It aint going to be perfect for everyone. Lots of people would see my partners rear as too large or too small, too soft or too firm. Like I really care? For me it is perfect and there is no need to admire another persons. Same goes for the rest of her.

It is an altogether different thing for me to comment on another females physique in that by doing so I am not thinking of any personal involvement but of how others may see her. I may see a bottom and think that is what I would consider too large or too small or too fat or too muscled. I can think that because my partner has the perfect one for me. The same applies to the rest of her anatomy.

If that makes me a freak then fine. I used to enjoy watching drew barrimore but not because I fancied her or even considered her figure any better than my partners. When I saw Shakira and thought she was attractive - it was not in comparison to the perfection of my partner.

So - there are men out there who do not look longingly at another forsaking their partner.

So ther you go. Nothing wrong with looking or admiring - unless you ahve a partner who should have your undivided attention. Outisde and in - you chose her or him cos they are the right person ffor you and not just some fly-by-night.

Dragon Of course you are not a freak.That is exactly the point I was making earlier, a group of ten men have to make a comment about every woman that passes them and 8 of them do it just because the other 2 are doing it - that is freakish! Saying how you really feel is being honest:)

Tulip,
Thanks for your gracious apology. Sorry if I sounded rather sharp there.

Tulip,

Same here. I didn't take offence anyhow. I can thoroughly recommend Edward O. Wilson's works. They are a very good read - entertaining and informative, even if you don't necessarily agree with all of his arguments.

:thumbsup: I will keep an open mind about the works of Edward
O. Wilson. You don't have to agree with all the opinions to find something interesting;)
There wouldn't be so many people visiting SF if that were the case.

Better start talking about the gluteus maximus again before someone gets annoyed about straying from the topic:cool:

Cheers guys:)

Originally posted by Trekker
I've always liked shapely female bottoms:clap:
As

Me too....apple shaped are my favourites but as long as the lady thinks that she looks good, respect to all the ladies who have created an unspoken and sometimes covert passtime to millions of male drivers and walkers who politely nod thier heads in appreciation.

yeah, distracting but it's bliss.