nightrider
05-07-2005, 11:37
I was watching this last night and he didnt seemt to attack him hard enough. e.g. why wont you cut green house gases? A: because we are developing alternative technolgies
but he then failed to ask exactly how and when these would be implemented, which seems a rather crucial point. It may be he does have a plan for this but Macdonald should have pushed him to find out exactly how much he had thought about what will be done so we can see how sincere he is. Otherwise it is all hot air. All he did was list various technologies that might help, but not how and when they would use them, how much they would help etc
Paxman wouldnt have been so easy (and yes he is obnoxious, but he asks tough questions and you really get to see if the politician knows what they are on about), so does anyone else think Trevor Macdonald was too much of a push-over?
but he then failed to ask exactly how and when these would be implemented, which seems a rather crucial point. It may be he does have a plan for this but Macdonald should have pushed him to find out exactly how much he had thought about what will be done so we can see how sincere he is. Otherwise it is all hot air. All he did was list various technologies that might help, but not how and when they would use them, how much they would help etc
Paxman wouldnt have been so easy (and yes he is obnoxious, but he asks tough questions and you really get to see if the politician knows what they are on about), so does anyone else think Trevor Macdonald was too much of a push-over?