what do you think people best line ups for each teams with current squads

1/ Grant
2/Buxton
3/Spurr
4/Wood
5/Beevers
6/Johnson
7/O`Conner
8/Potter (on loan from Wolves)
9/Tudgay
10/Sodje
11/Esajas

1.Granty
2.Buxton
3.Tommy
4.Beevers
5.Woody
6.JJ
7.Gray (best player against Charlton)
8.Harry Potter
9.O Conner (looked a lot better with Harry at his side)
10.Tudders
11.Sodje

1.Granty
2.Buxton
3.Tommy
4.Beevers
5.Woody
6.JJ
7.Gray (best player against Charlton)
8.Harry Potter
9.O Conner (looked a lot better with Harry at his side)
10.Tudders
11.Sodje

Same here. I do like Esajas as well but Gray is much better. I might go for Watson instead of O'Connor.

1.Granty
2.Buxton
3.Tommy
4.Beevers
5.Woody
6.JJ
7.Gray (best player against Charlton)
8.Harry Potter
9.O Conner (looked a lot better with Harry at his side)
10.Tudders
11.Sodje

Tudders and JJ, you sounds like an American school girl ------ whooooohooooooooo, Tudders have you seen JJ.

Nearly as annoying as the 90's when you lot had a team made up of Woodys, Dezzy, Brighty, Hirsty, Vivy, Chrissy, Rolly, Worthy, Kingy, Shezzy and Nigel Pearsony (justy so he wasn't left out!!!)

sure plenty of utd fans are the same stockers, i hear blackwell say the same sort of thing and other managers all the time.
best team i would go with corkers, not seen gray play yet so having to go on it when he wasnt with us

Kenny
Naughton
killa
ugo
naysmith
webber
quinn
howard
halford
henderson
sharp

Same here. I do like Esajas as well but Gray is much better. I might go for Watson instead of O'Connor.

I thought O conner shone at the side of Potter, as ive said before Macallister and O conner didn't mix in the middle together, Harry and O conner compliment each others games.

In a 4-3-3 formation;

Kenny
Naughton
Naysmith
Killgallon
Ugo
Halford
Monty
Quinn
Webber
Henderson
Sharp

Tudders and JJ, you sounds like an American school girl ------ whooooohooooooooo, Tudders have you seen JJ.

Nearly as annoying as the 90's when you lot had a team made up of Woodys, Dezzy, Brighty, Hirsty, Vivy, Chrissy, Rolly, Worthy, Kingy, Shezzy and Nigel Pearsony (justy so he wasn't left out!!!)

Wat daa guin on abaat nah :cool:

I thought O conner shone at the side of Potter, as ive said before Macallister and O conner didn't mix in the middle together, Harry and O conner compliment each others games.

He had a decent match alongside Potter, yeah, but I still prefer Watson I think. I'm going to the Birmingham match so I'll see how they do this time.

He had a decent match alongside Potter, yeah, but I still prefer Watson I think. I'm going to the Birmingham match so I'll see how they do this time.

I never thought id say it but with Watson's age he has become an impact player, i can't remember who it was against but he came on as a sub and got hold of the game by the scruff of the neck it may well have been the Blades.

birmingham v swfc match is on TV (skysports1)

I never thought id say it but with Watson's age he has become an impact player, i can't remember who it was against but he came on as a sub and got hold of the game by the scruff of the neck it may well have been the Blades.

Yeah, he's great to bring on off the bench. He's scored a few important goals for us. If O'Connor could get a goal here or there it would help. His shooting seems a little wayward. Nearly as bad as Johnson's!

Tudders and JJ, you sounds like an American school girl ------ whooooohooooooooo, Tudders have you seen JJ.

Nearly as annoying as the 90's when you lot had a team made up of Woodys, Dezzy, Brighty, Hirsty, Vivy, Chrissy, Rolly, Worthy, Kingy, Shezzy and Nigel Pearsony (justy so he wasn't left out!!!)

Your desperation to talk about Wednesday when there's just no need strikes again! So you lot never talk about the likes of Morgs, BT, Quinny, Monty, Killa, Deano, etc etc? Not forgetting Blackie of course. It's human nature, people give people nicknames of this ilk, get over it.

What really amuses me is when grown men on here talk about "Wendy", or "the wendies". It doesn't bother or upset us in the slightest, it just makes you all sound like nursery kids and it's so funny to hear you all saying it without any hint of embarrassment.

That said, I hate the word "Tudders", but I suppose it's better than using the other part of his name and calling him "Gayers"...

i agree - i never call our rivals from the lane blunts , or piggies:hihi:

Nearly as annoying as the 90's when you lot had a team made up of Woodys, Dezzy, Brighty, Hirsty, Vivy, Chrissy, Rolly, Worthy, Kingy, Shezzy and Nigel Pearsony (justy so he wasn't left out!!!)

They're not proper footballers unless you can add 'y' to the end of their name. :hihi:

They're not proper footballers unless you can add 'y' to the end of their name. :hihi:

That's why Slusarski couldn't stay.

If everyone is fit.

1Grant
2.Simek
3.Spurr
4.Beevers
5.Wood
6.JJ
7.Esajas
8.Potter
9.O Conner
10.Tudgay
11.Sodje

Your desperation to talk about Wednesday when there's just no need strikes again! So you lot never talk about the likes of Morgs, BT, Quinny, Monty, Killa, Deano, etc etc? Not forgetting Blackie of course. It's human nature, people give people nicknames of this ilk, get over it.

What really amuses me is when grown men on here talk about "Wendy", or "the wendies". It doesn't bother or upset us in the slightest, it just makes you all sound like nursery kids and it's so funny to hear you all saying it without any hint of embarrassment.

That said, I hate the word "Tudders", but I suppose it's better than using the other part of his name and calling him "Gayers"...


you wendies are sooooooooooooo eaaaaaaaasssssssyyyyyy

you wendies are sooooooooooooo eaaaaaaaasssssssyyyyyy

yawnnnnnnnnnnnn
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:rolleye s:

yawnnnnnnnnnnnn
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz:rolleye s:

the most boring "man" on the forum is getting a taste of his own medicine.