HarryBustard
23-01-2009, 22:35
I've seen several threads over time on this subject but can't find one via a search so have had to start this new one - though if anyone can point me to one here or elsewhere then please do so. I did find some on the supplementary one about security (see later) but any pointers here - even if they are to recent threads - would be appreciated.
A "technically-challenged" family I know with one Windows XP system and two Vista ones (all "Home" editions) need them backing up with as little fuss as possible - ideally to a drive which is connected to each computer as and when a backup (or restore) is required - i.e. shared between them. (They have a wireless router with Ethernet ports for connection to NAS for that and file sharing if need be - my recommended method being with a LaCie 2big Network (2-disk RAID) drive (http://www.lacie.com/uk/products/product.htm?pid=10953) - and I know the initial system backups would take an age.) I'm familiar with Norton Ghost 9.0 and whilst that used to suit me when I used Windows XP Pro (days thankfully long behind me) it's a bit heavy-handed for the likes of them. I see the makers of that have a product called "...Save & Restore 2.0" but at £40 a license - i.e. £120 in all - it's quite a price to pay. Still, better a good application at a price than a bad one for nothing - and backups are the most important thing which most computer users should do.
I think they need their system security beefing up too (i.e. against malware threats et cetera) and so I might even get them to consider Norton 360 - despite the even bigger financial hit and the poor opinions I've seen about it on here. In fact maybe they'd be better off with a specific backup system or strategy and go with Norton Internet Security 2009 or Kaspersky Internet Security 2009 suites as recommended in this (http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=411617) thread. Again the financial hit may be high for three systems but I'm not the one who will be forking out and if it were my decision I'd pay for the safest and most hassle-free option - if only I could find out which it is.
I know it appears that I'm too lazy to look around the Internet (or dig deeper in the forum) but as is so often the case specific needs sometimes demand specific answers and, besides, having "gone Mac" (rather than "gone mad" with Windows) I'm out of touch with such these days and don't particularly want to catch up even if it's to help relatives. Still, at least I don't have to worry (much) about malware and I can let Time Machine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Machine_(Apple_software)) (with "belt & braces" help from SuperDuper (http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDuper/SuperDuperDescription.html) and Carbon Copy Cloner (http://bombich.com/ccc)) look after my backups.
Finally, if upgrading the XP box to Vista is worth doing as a first step then I'll recommend that - probably a good idea anyway since two of the three are so encumbered.
A "technically-challenged" family I know with one Windows XP system and two Vista ones (all "Home" editions) need them backing up with as little fuss as possible - ideally to a drive which is connected to each computer as and when a backup (or restore) is required - i.e. shared between them. (They have a wireless router with Ethernet ports for connection to NAS for that and file sharing if need be - my recommended method being with a LaCie 2big Network (2-disk RAID) drive (http://www.lacie.com/uk/products/product.htm?pid=10953) - and I know the initial system backups would take an age.) I'm familiar with Norton Ghost 9.0 and whilst that used to suit me when I used Windows XP Pro (days thankfully long behind me) it's a bit heavy-handed for the likes of them. I see the makers of that have a product called "...Save & Restore 2.0" but at £40 a license - i.e. £120 in all - it's quite a price to pay. Still, better a good application at a price than a bad one for nothing - and backups are the most important thing which most computer users should do.
I think they need their system security beefing up too (i.e. against malware threats et cetera) and so I might even get them to consider Norton 360 - despite the even bigger financial hit and the poor opinions I've seen about it on here. In fact maybe they'd be better off with a specific backup system or strategy and go with Norton Internet Security 2009 or Kaspersky Internet Security 2009 suites as recommended in this (http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=411617) thread. Again the financial hit may be high for three systems but I'm not the one who will be forking out and if it were my decision I'd pay for the safest and most hassle-free option - if only I could find out which it is.
I know it appears that I'm too lazy to look around the Internet (or dig deeper in the forum) but as is so often the case specific needs sometimes demand specific answers and, besides, having "gone Mac" (rather than "gone mad" with Windows) I'm out of touch with such these days and don't particularly want to catch up even if it's to help relatives. Still, at least I don't have to worry (much) about malware and I can let Time Machine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Machine_(Apple_software)) (with "belt & braces" help from SuperDuper (http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDuper/SuperDuperDescription.html) and Carbon Copy Cloner (http://bombich.com/ccc)) look after my backups.
Finally, if upgrading the XP box to Vista is worth doing as a first step then I'll recommend that - probably a good idea anyway since two of the three are so encumbered.